Biases induced by using geography and environment to guide ex situ conservation
- 61 Downloads
Ex situ germplasm collections seek to conserve maximum genetic diversity in a small number of samples. Geographic and environmental information have long been treated as surrogate measures of genetic diversity, proposed to be useful for increasing allelic diversity of collections. We examine the effect of maximizing geographic and environmental diversity on the retention of distinct haplotype blocks in germplasm subsets, using three species with extensive genomewide genotypic data. We show that maximizing diversity in the surrogate measures produces subsets with uneven representation of haplotypic diversity across the genome. Some regions are well-conserved, exhibiting high haplotypic diversity, while others are poorly-conserved and contain significantly less haplotypic diversity than would be obtained via random sampling. In two of three species, poorly-conserved genomic regions were enriched in regulatory genes which, as a class, contribute to phenotypic variation. The specific genes affected varied by species but, overall, haplotypic diversity was poorly-conserved at genes controlling ~ 10% of major molecular functions and biological processes. While this study was limited to three exemplar species, we find little evidence to support continued use of geographic or environmental surrogates for ex situ conservation activities attempting to capture maximum genomewide allelic diversity. Although geographic and environmental diversity have proven to be reliable predictors of allele frequency differences and ecotypic differentiation across species ranges, they appear to be poor predictors of allelic diversity per se, offering little opportunity to enrich collections for haplotypic diversity overall, and ample opportunity to bias the conservation of important functional genetic variation. We propose a bioinformatic bridge between haplotypic diversity and the potential phenotypic diversity residing in collections using the Gene Ontology.
KeywordsGene ontology Genetic diversity Genomewide SNP Haplotype block Phenotype
We thank Kelly Robbins for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research used resources provided by the SCINet project of the USDA Agricultural Research Service, ARS Project Number 0500-00093-001-00-D.
This study was supported through funds provided to the National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Plant Preservation Research Unit by USDA-ARS National Program 301.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25:25–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brown AHD (1995) The core collection at the crossroads. In: Hodgkin T, Brown AHD, van Hintum TJL, Morales EAV (eds) Core collections of plant genetic resources. Wiley, Chichester, pp 55–76Google Scholar
- Frankel OH, Brown AHD (1984) Current plant genetic resources—a critical appraisal. In: Genetics: new frontiers, volume IV applied genetics, Proceedings of the XV congress of genetics. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, pp 3–13Google Scholar
- Geraldes A, Farzaneh N, Grassa CJ, McKown AD, Guy RD, Mansfield SD, Douglas CJ, Cronk QCB (2014) Landscape genomics of Populus trichocarpa: the role of hybridization, limited gene flow, and natural selection in shaping patterns of population structure. Evolution 68:3260–3280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gross BL, Volk GM, Richards CM, Reeves PA, Henk AD, Forsline PL, Szewc-McFadden A, Fazio G, Chao CT (2013) Diversity captured in the USDA-ARS national plant germplasm system apple core collection. J Am Soc Hort Sci 138:375–381Google Scholar
- Lasky JR, Upadhyaya HD, Ramu P, Deshpande S, Hash CT, Bonnette J, Juenger TE, Hyma K, Acharya C, Mitchell SE, Buckler ES, Brenton Z, Kresovich S, Morris GP (2015) Genome–environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits. Sci Adv 1:e1400218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Zhu Z, Chern M, Yin J, Yang C, Ran L, Cheng M, He M, Wang K, Wang J, Zhou X, Zhu X, Chen Z, Wang J, Zhao W, Ma B, Qin P, Chen W, Wang Y, Liu J, Wang W, Wu X, Li P, Wang J, Zhu L, Li S, Chen X (2017) A natural allele of a transcription factor in rice confers broadspectrum blast resistance. Cell 170:114–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu S, Zhao X, Hu Y, Liu S, Nan H, Li X, Fang C, Cao D, Shi X, Kong L, Su T, Zhang F, Li S, Wang Z, Yuan X, Cober ER, Weller JL, Liu B, Hou X, Tian Z, Kong F (2017) Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nat Genet 49:773–779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoen DJ, Brown AHD (1995) Maximising genetic diversity in core collections of wild relatives of crop species. In: Hodgkin T, Brown AHD, van Hintum TJL, Morales EAV (eds) Core collections of plant genetic resources. Wiley, Chichester, pp 55–76Google Scholar
- Taketa S, Amano S, Tsujino Y, Sato T, Saisho D, Kakeda K, Nomura M, Suzuki T, Matsumoto T, Sato K, Kanamori H, Kawasaki S, Takeda K (2008) Barley grain with adhering hulls is controlled by an ERF family transcription factor gene regulating a lipid biosynthesis pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:4062–4067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the endangered species act. Am Fish Soc Symp 17:8–27Google Scholar