Abstract
Understanding effects of habitat and landscape features on genetic variation is a prerequisite for the development of habitat and landscape management strategies aimed at conserving genetic diversity. While there has been considerable research on the effects of landscape structure on the genetics of populations, a recent review identified key biases in this body of work. The majority of landscape genetic studies investigate the intervening matrix’s influence on differentiation and gene flow among populations. Although characteristics of local habitat patches may be important determinants of genetic diversity, fewer studies have examined these relationships. Here we use node- and neighbourhood-based approaches to analyze correlates of genetic diversity in the bog copper (Lycaena epixanthe), a specialist butterfly endemic to temperate Nearctic peatlands that is threatened in parts of its range. Based on 190 repeatable and polymorphic amplified fragment length polymorphism loci, we found that genetic diversity was higher in habitat patches that were smaller and surrounded by more open water. Our results indicate that valuing small peatlands and preserving the surrounding water table may be important for conservation of genetic diversity in this highly specialized species. Our study highlights the importance of variables affecting habitat quality for conservation genetics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addo-Bediako A, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2002) Metabolic cold adaptation in insects: a large-scale perspective. Funct Ecol 16:332–338
Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, London
Alda F, Garcia J, Garcia JT, Suarez-Seoane S (2013) Local genetic structure on breeding grounds of a long-distance migrant passerine: the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) in Spain. J Hered 104:36–46
Bensch S, Åkesson M (2005) Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals? Mol Ecol 14:2899–2914
Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273
Bossart JL, Antwi JB (2016) Limited erosion of genetic and species diversity from small forest patches: sacred forest groves in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot have high conservation value for butterflies. Biol Conserv 198:122–134
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Cassie D (2006) The thermal regime of rivers: a review. Freshw Biol 51:1389–1406
Cech R, Tudor G (2005) Butterflies of the East Coast. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Clarke A, Meudt H (2005) AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) for multilocus genomic fingerprinting. Alan Wilson Centre for Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, New Zealand. http://www.clarkeresearch.org. Accessed 23 June 2017
Crawford LA, Desjardins S, Keyghobadi N (2011) Fine-scale genetic structure of an endangered population of the Mormon metalmark butterfly (Apodemia mormo) revealed using AFLPs. Conserv Genet 12:991–1001
Crawford LA, Koscinski D, Keyghobadi N (2012) A call for more transparent reporting of error rates: the quality of AFLP data in ecological and evolutionary research. Mol Ecol 21:5911–5917
Crawford LA, Koscinski D, Watt KM, McNeil JN, Keyghobadi N (2013) Mating and oviposition success of a butterfly are not affected by non-lethal tissue sampling. J Insect Conserv 17:859–864
Curtis RJ, Brereton TM, Dennis RLH, Carbone C, Isaac NJB (2015) Butterfly abundance is determined by food availability and is mediated by species traits. J Appl Ecol 52:1676–1684
Deane DC, Fordham DA, He F, Bradshaw CJA (2017) Future extinction risk of wetland plants is higher from individual patch loss than total area reduction. Biol Conserv 209:27–33
Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1976) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J Insect Conserv 1:167–176
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966
DiLeo MF, Wagner HH (2016) A landscape ecologist’s agenda for landscape genetics. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 1:115–126
Drees C, Zumstein P, Thorsten B-D, Härdtle W, Martern A, Meyer H, von Oheimb G, Assmann T (2011) Genetic erosion in habitat specialist shows need to protect large peat bogs. Conserv Genet 12:1651–1656
Ellwood ER, Playfair SR, Polgar CA, Primack RB (2014) Cranberry flowering times and climate change in southern Massachusetts. Int J Biometeorol 58:1693–1697
Fahrig L (2015) Just a hypothesis: a reply to Hanski. J Biogeogr 42:993–994
Fahrig L (2017) Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu Rev Ecol Evol 48:1–23
Finger A, Schmitt T, Zachos FE, Meyer m, Assmann T, Habel JC (2009) The genetic status of the violet copper Lycaena helle – a relict of the cold past in times of global warming. Ecography 32:382–390
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2002) Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia. Biol Conserv 106:129–136
Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjögren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD (2002) Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv Biol 16:706–716
Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508
Gradish AE, Keyghobadi N, Otis GW (2015) Population genetic structure and genetic diversity of the threatened White Mountain arctic butterfly (Oeneis Melissa semidea). Conserv Genet 16:1253–1264
Grundel R, Pavlovic NB (2007) Response of bird species densities to habitat structure and fire history along a Midwestern open-forest gradient. Condor 109:734–749
Habel JC, Finger A, Schmitt T, Nève G (2010) Survival of the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented environment: genetic analyses over 15 years. J Zool Syst Evol Res 49:25–31
Hanski I (2015) Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J Biogeogr 42:989–993
Hanski I, Moilanen A, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M (1996) The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Cons Biol 10:578–590
Hanski I, Schulz T, Wong SC, Ahola V, Ruokolainen A, Ojanen SP (2017) Ecological and genetic basis of metapopulation persistence of the glanville fritillary butterfly in fragmented landscapes. Nat Commun 8:14504
Herrmann D, Poncet BN, Manel S, Rioux D, Gielly L, Taberlet P, Gugerli F (2010) Selection criteria for scoring amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLPs) positively affect the reliability of population genetic parameter estimates. Genome 53:302–310
Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2008) Landscape genetics. Bioscience 58:199–207
Johnson CW (1985) Bogs of the northeast. University Press of New England, Hanover
Keyghobadi N (2007) The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool 85:1049–1064
Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck C (2005) Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity. Mol Ecol 14:1897–1909
Keyghobadi N, Crawford L, Maxwell S (2009) Successful analysis of AFLPs from non-lethally sampled wing tissues in butterflies. Conserv Genet 10:2021–2024
Koscinski D, Crawford LA, Keller HA, Keyghobadi N (2011) Effects of different methods of non-lethal tissue sampling on butterflies. Ecol Entomol 36:301–308
Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Conserv 120:355–361
Layberry RA, Hall PW, Lafontaine JD (1998) The butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2010) Natural, not urban, barriers define population structure for a coastal endemic butterfly. Conserv Genet 11:2311–2320
Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3:91–99
McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 23 June 2017
McKee AM, Maerz JC, Smith LL, Glenn TC (2017) Habitat predictors of genetic diversity for two sympatric wetland-breeding amphibian species. Ecol Evol 7:6271–6283
Millette K, Keyghobadi N (2015) The relative influence of habitat amount and configuration on genetic structure across multiple spatial scales. Ecol Evol 5:73–86
Milot E, Weimerskirch H, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2007) Surviving with low genetic diversity: the case of albatrosses. Proc R Soc B 274:779–787
Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503–2515
Murphy MA, Dezzani R, Pilliod DS, Storfer A (2010) Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol Ecol 19:3634–3649
NatureServe (2017) NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. NatureServe. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. Accessed 23 June 2017
Nève G, Barascud B, Descimon H, Baguette M (2008) Gene flow rise with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). BMC Evol Biol 8:84
Opler PA, Malikul V (1992) Eastern butterflies. Peterson field guide. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290
Pitra C, Suárez-Seoane S, Martín CA, Streich W-J, Alonso JC (2011) Linking habitat quality with genetic diversity: a lesson from great bustards in Spain. Eur J Wildlife Res 57:411–419
Porlier M, Bélisle M, Garant D (2009) Non-random distribution of individual genetic diversity along an environmental gradient. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1543–1554
Ranius T, Nilsson SG, Franzén M (2011) How frequent is metapopulation structure among butterflies in grasslands? Occurrence patterns in a forest-dominated landscape in southern Sweden. Écoscience 18:138–144
Rasic G, Keyghobadi N (2012) From broadscale patterns to fine-scale processes: habitat structure influences genetic differentiation in the pitcher plant midge across multiple spatial scales. Mol Ecol 21:223–236
Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) The correlation between population fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237
Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494
Spitzer K, Danks HV (2006) Insect biodiversity of boreal peat bogs. Annu Rev Entomol 51:137–161
Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP (2007) Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128–142
Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP (2010) Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol Ecol 19:3496–3514
Struebig MJ, Kingston T, Petit EJ, Le Comber SC, Zubaid A, Mohd-Adnan A, Rossiter SJ (2011) Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments. Ecol Lett 14:582–590
Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2011) High and dry or sunk and dunked: lessons for tallgrass prairies from quaking bogs. J Insect Conserv 15:165–178
Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc B 268:1791–1796
Transeau EN (1903) On the geographic distribution and ecological relations of the bog plant societies of northern North America. Bot Gaz 36:401–420
Turlure C, Van Dyck H, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2009) Resource-based habitat definition, niche overlap and conservation of two sympatric glacial relict butterflies. Oikos 118:950–960
Turlure C, Choutt J, Baguette M, Van Dyck H (2010a) Microclimate buffering and resource-based habitat in a glacial relict butterfly: significance for conservation under climate change. Glob Change Biol 16:1883–1893
Turlure C, Choutt J, Van Dyck H, Baguette M, Schtickzelle N (2010b) Functional habitat area as a reliable proxy for population size: case study using two butterfly species of conservation concern. J Insect Conserv 14:379–388
van Sway CA, Warren MS, Loïs G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209
Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M (2004) Genetic population structure of the vulnerable bog fritillary butterfly. Hereditas 141:199–206
Vandewoestijne S, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2008) Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol 6:46
Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Rodán-Ruiz I (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11:139–151
Vergeer P, Rengelink R, Copal A, Ouborg NJ (2003) The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. J Ecol 91:18–26
Wagner HH, Fortin MJ (2013) A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of landscape genetic data. Conserv Gent 14:253–261
Warton DI, Hui FKC (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3–10
Whitlock R, Hipperson H, Mannarelli M, Butlin RK, Burke T (2008) An objective, rapid, and reproducible method for scoring AFLP peak-height data that minimizes genotyping error. Mol Ecol Res 8:725–735
Wilson PJ, Provan J (2003) Effect of habitat fragmentation on levels and patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of the peat moss Polytrichum commune. Proc R Soc B 270:881–886
Wright DM (1983) Life history and morphology of the immature stages of the Bog Copper butterfly Lycaena epixanthe (Bsd. & Le C.) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Res Lepidoptera 22:47–100
Zhang H, Hare MP (2012) Identifying and reducing AFLP genotyping error: an example of tradeoffs when comparing population structure in broadcast spawning versus brooding oysters. Heredity 108:616–625
Zhivotovsky L (1999) Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8:907–913
Acknowledgements
We thank W. Chick, J. Donald, C. Irvine, H. Keller, K. Schreiber and K. Weaver for their help with field and/or lab work. We also acknowledge J. Hillyer, and J. Dromboskie, J. Peters and R. Stronks (Algonquin Provincial Park) for providing GIS data and information on Lycaena epixanthe distribution, respectively. Permission to conduct research in Algonquin Provincial Park and logistical support was provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Harkness Laboratory for Fisheries Research. This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation and Western University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crawford, L.A., Keyghobadi, N. Analysis of genetic diversity in a peatland specialist butterfly suggests an important role for habitat quality and small habitat patches. Conserv Genet 19, 1109–1121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-018-1082-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-018-1082-7