Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 349–363 | Cite as

Conservation genetics of an endemic and threatened amphibian (Capensibufo rosei): a leap towards establishing a genetic monitoring framework

  • Jessica M. da Silva
  • Krystal A. Tolley
Research Article

Abstract

Given the ever-increasing anthropogenic changes to natural ecosystems, it is imperative that temporal changes in genetic diversity be monitored to help safeguard the future viability of species. Capensibufo rosei is a small, range-restricted bufonid from South Africa, believed to have experienced an enigmatic decline likely due to the suppression of natural fires and the loss of grazing animals from some areas. Without these disturbances, their habitat becomes overgrown, which might affect the characteristics of their breeding pools. Since the 1980s, four breeding sites have been lost, presumably due to loss of breeding habitat through encroachment of vegetation. Currently, there are only two known populations [Cape of Good Hope (CGH) and Silvermine nature reserves] both within Table Mountain National Park. Consequently, this species may be vulnerable to stochastic events and genetic erosion through the loss of metapopulation connectivity. To assess the genetic status of this species, genetic diversity within both populations was quantified for two time periods using 11 microsatellite markers. Despite evidence of severe population bottlenecks, both populations possess levels of diversity similar to other anurans, and Silvermine has greater diversity than CGH. A close examination of the data revealed both populations to be genetically dynamic through time, with the loss and gain of rare alleles. Both populations also experienced a slight increase in overall diversity between sampling periods. While the latter was not statistically significant, the monitoring period was perhaps too short to understand changes in diversity over time. These results will form the baseline for future monitoring to better understand this threatened and declining species and to track genetic erosion or recovery.

Keywords

Africa Bufonidae Genetic monitoring Rose’s mountain toadlet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (NRF Incentive Funds IPRR: IFR2011040500035) and by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (National Monitoring Framework). We are grateful to South African National Parks (Table Mountain National Park), J. Measey and F. Becker for support during the collection of samples, J. Wang for his assistance with the program MLNE, as well as A. R. Hoezel for his input and feedback with our DIYABC analysis. Lastly, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments, who helped improve the manuscript. This work was carried out under South African National Biodiversity Institute Ethics Clearance (No. 003/2011), Research Agreement with South African National Parks, and Western Cape provincial permits (CapeNature: 0056-AA008-00021).

Supplementary material

10592_2017_1008_MOESM1_ESM.docx (766 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 766 KB)

References

  1. Allentoft ME, O’Brien J (2010) Global amphibian declines, loss of genetic diversity and fitness: a review. Diversity 2:47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altwegg R, Roulin A, Kestenholz M, Jenni L (2003) Variation and covariation in survival, dispersal, and population size in barn owls Tyto alba. J Anim Ecol 72:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont MA et al (2009) Adaptive approximate bayesian computation. Biometrika 96:983–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker F (2014) Searching for answers to the silent decline: first estimates of survival and recruitment for the critically endangered Rose’s mountain toadlet, Capensibufo rosei. Hons. Dissertation, University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker FS (2017) Estimating the global population size of animals that are hard to find: the case of Rose’s mountain toadlet. M.Sc. dissertation. University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker F, Tolley KA, Measey GM, Altwegg R (in press) Extreme climate-induced life-history plasticity in an amphibian. Am NatGoogle Scholar
  7. Bermond G, Ciosi M, Lombaert E, Blin A, Boriani M et al (2012) Secondary contact and admixture between independently invading populations of the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera in Europe. PLoS ONE 7:e50129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Björklund M (2005) A method for adjusting allele frequencies in the case of microsatellite allele drop-out. Mol Ecol Notes 5:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond WJ (1997) Functional types for predicting changes in bidoversity: a case stufy in Cape fynbos. In: Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (eds) Plant Functional Types: their relevance to ecosystm properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Canbridge, pp 174–194Google Scholar
  10. Brookfield JFY (1996) A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol Ecol 5:453–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Campagne P, Smouse PE, Varouchas G, Silvain JF, Leru B (2012) Comparing the van Oosterhout and Chybicki-Burczyk methods of estimating null allele frequencies for inbred populations. Mol Ecol Resour 12:975–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Channing A, Measey GJ, de Villiers AL, Turner AA, Tolley KA (2017) Taxonomy of the Capensibufo rosei group (Anura: Bufonidae) from South Africa. Zootaxa 4232:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapuis M-P, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (2010) Elements of evolutionary genetics. Roberts & Co., Greenwood VillageGoogle Scholar
  15. Chevolot M, Ellis JR, Rijnsdorp AD, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2008) Temporal changes in allele frequencies but stable genetic diversity over the past 40 years in the Irish Sea population of thornback ray, Raja clavata. Heredity 101:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J (2009) Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 100:106–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chybicki IJ, Oleksa A, Burczyk J (2011) Increased inbreeding and strong kinship structure in Taxus baccata estimated from both AFLP and SSR data. Heredity 107:589–600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1977) Digenic descent measures for finite populations. Genet Res 30:121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornuet J-M, Santos F, Beaumont MA et al (2008) Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly\rapproach to approximate bayesian computation. Bioinformatics 24:2713–2719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornuet J-M, Pudlo P, Veyssier J, Dehne-Garcia A, Gautier M, Leblois R, Marin J-M, Estoup A (2014) DIYABC v2.0: a software to make approximate bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence and microsatellite data. Bioinformatics 30:1187–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cressey ER, Measey GJ, Tolley KA (2015) Fading out of view: the enigmatic decline of Rose’s mountain toad Capensibufo rosei. Oryx 49:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. da Silva JM, Feldheim KA, Daniels RJ, Edwards S, Tolley KA (2016) Analysis of genetic diversity in Rose’s mountain toadlet (Capensibufo rosei) using novel microsatellite markers. Afr J Herpet 65:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. da Silva JM, Feldheim KA, Measey GJ, Doucette-Riise S, Daniels RJ, Chauke LF, Tolley KA (2017) Genetic diversity and differentiation of the Western Leopard Toad (Sclerophrys pantherina) based on mitochondrial and microsatellite markers. Afr J Herpet 66:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93:504–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Demandt MH (2010) Temporal changes in genetic diversity of isolated populations of perch and roach. Conserv Genet 11:249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) (2014) South Africa’s Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biodiversity, March 2014, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South African Government, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  27. Dornelas M, Magurran AE, Buckland ST, Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Curtis T, Gaston KJ, Gotelli NJ, Kosnik NJ, McGill B, McCune JL, Morlon H, Mumby PJ, Øvreås L, Studeny A, Vellend M (2013) Quantifying temporal change in biodiversity: challenges and opportunities. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:1–10Google Scholar
  28. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012)) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards S, Tolley KA, Measey GJ (2017) Habitat characteristics influence the breeding of Rose’s dwarf mountain toadlet Capensibufo rosei (Anura: Bufonidae). Herpet J 27:287–298Google Scholar
  30. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Excoffier L, Lischer H (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Forsyth GG, Kruger FJ, Le Maitre DC (2010) National Veldfire risk assessment: analysis of exposure of social, economic and environmental assets to Veldfire hazards in South Africa. CSIR Report No: CSIR/NRE/ECO/ER/2010/0023/C. CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  34. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert KJ, Whitlock MC (2015) Evaluating methods for estimating local effective population size with and without migration. Evol Int J Org Evol 69:2154–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grandison AGC (1980) A new genus of toad (Anura: Bufonidae) from the Republic of South Africa with remarks on its relationships. Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist (Zool) 39:293–298Google Scholar
  39. Green DM (2003) The ecology of extinction: population fluctuation and decline in amphibians. Biol Conserv 111:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guo S, Thompson E (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Habel JC, Schmitt T (2012) The burden of genetic diversity. Biol Conserv 147:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hawks J, Hunley K, Lee S-H, Wolpoff M (2000) Population bottlenecks and Pleistocene human evolution. Mol Biol Evol 17:2–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hieb EE, Nelson DH, Morris AB (2014) Genetic monitoring reveals loss of microsatellite diversity in a breeding population of the endangered Alabama red-bellied turtle. Endang Species Res 23:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoban S, Arntzen JA, Bruford MW, Godoy JA, Hoezel AR, Segelbacher G, Vilà C, Bertorelle G (2014) Comparative evaluation of potential indicators and temporal sampling protocols for monitoring genetic erosion. Evol Appl 7:984–999CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Holm S (1979) A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  46. Hughes AR, Stachowicz JJ (2004) Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:8998–9002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Husemann M, Zachos FE, Paxton RJ, Habel JC (2016) Effective population size in ecology and evolution. Heredity 117:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hutchinson WF, van Oosterhout C, Rogers SI, Carvalho GR (2003) Temporal analysis of archived samples indicates marked genetic changes in declining North Sea cod (Gadus morhua). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2125–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jakobssen M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jordan S, Giersch JJ, Muhlfeld CC, Hotaling S, Fanning L, Tappenbeck TH, Luikart G (2016) Loss of genetic diversity and increased subdivision in an endemic alpine stonefly threatened by climate change. PLoS ONE 11:e0157386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Kalinowski ST (2004) Counting alleles with rarefaction: private alleles and hierarchical sampling designs. Conserv Genet 5:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Laikre L (2010) Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conserv Genet 11:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Laikre L, Allendorf FW, Aroner LC, Baker CS, Gregovich DP, Hansen MM, Jackson JA, Kendall KC, Mckelvey K, Neel MC, Olivieri I, Ryman N, Schwartz MK, Bull RS, Stetz JB, Tallmon DA, Taylor BL, Vojta CD, Waller DM, Waples RS (2010) Neglect of genetic diversity in implementation of the convention on biological diversity. Conserv Biol 24:86–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Laikre L, Lundmark C, Jansson E, WennerstrÓ§m L, Edman M, SandstrÓ§m (2016) Lack of recognition of genetic biodiversity: international policy and its implementation in Baltic Sea marine protected areas. Ambio 45:661–680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Lannoo MJ (2005) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States Species. University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Le Clerc V, Bazante F, Baril C, Guiard J, Zhang D (2005) Assessing temporal changes in genetic diversity of maize varieties using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 110:294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. MacManes M (2008) MacManes salt extraction protocol. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Evolutionary Genetics Lab, Berkeley. http://mvz.berkeley.edu/egl/protocols/extraction/MacManesSaltExtraction.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2016
  59. McCaffery RM, Maxell BA (2010) Decreased winter severity increases viability of a montane frog population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8644–8649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Measey GJ (ed) (2011) Ensuring a future for South Africa’s frogs: a strategy for conservation research. SANBI Biodiversity Series 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  61. Minter LR, Burger M, Harrison JA, Braack HH, Bishop PJ, Kloepfer D (2004) Atlas and Red Data Book of the Frogs of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  63. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Newell DA, Goldingay RL, Brooks LO (2013) Population recovery following decline in an Endangered stream-breeding frog (Mixophyes fleayi) from subtropical Africa. PLoS ONE 8:e58559CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Nielsen JL, Carpanzano C, Fountain MC, Gan CA (1997) Mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite diversity in hatchery and wild Oncorhynchus mykiss from freshwater habitats in southern California. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Procter D, Eigenbrod F, Freckleton R, Hector A, Orme CDL, Petchey OL, Proença V, Raffaelli D, Suttle KB, Mace GM, Martín-López B, Woodcock BA, Bullock JM (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol Evol 30:673–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Paetkau D, Strobeck C (1995) The molecular basis and evolutionary history of a microsatellite null allele in bears. Mol Ecol 4:519–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Peery MZ, Kirby R, Reid BN, Stoelting R, Doucet-Bëer E, Robinson S, Vásquez-Carrillo C, Pauli JN, Palsbøll PJ (2012) Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol Ecol 21:3403–3418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Walters M, Geller GN, Jongman RHG, Scholes RJ, Bruford MW, Brummit N, Butchart SHM, Cardoso AC, Coops NC, Dulloo E, Faith DP, Freyhof J, Gregory RD, Heip C, HÓ§ft R, Hurtt G, Jetz W, Karp WS, McGeoch MA, Obura D, Onoda Y, Pettorelli N, Reyers B, Sayre R, Scharlemann JPW, Stuart SN, Turak E, Walpole M, Wegmann M (2013) Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339:277–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pertoldi C, Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2007) Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges. Biodivers Conserv 16:4147–4163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Potvin DA, Parris KM, Smith Date KL, Keely CC, Bray RD, Hale J, Hunjan S, Austin JJ, Melville J (2016) Genetic erosion and escalating extinction risk in frogs with increasing wildlife frequency. J App Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12809 Google Scholar
  72. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:2826–2831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evol Int J Org Evol 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodrigáñez J, Barragán C, Alves E, Gortázar C, Toro MA, Silió (2008) Genetic diversity and allelic richness in Spanish wild and domestic pig population estimated from microsatellite markers. Span J Agric Res 6:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roger F, Godhe A, Gamfeldt L (2012) Genetic diversity and ecosystem functioning in the face of multiple stressors. PLoS ONE 7:e45007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Roques S, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (1999) Potential of microsatellites for individual assignment: the North Atlantic redfish (genus Sebastes) species complex as a case study. Mol Ecol 8:1703–1717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenberg NA (2004) Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roth S, Jehle R (2016) High genetic diversity of common toad (Bufo bufo) populations under strong natural fragmentation on a Northern archipelago. Ecol Evol 6:1626–1636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS (2007) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol 22:25–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Shaffer ML (1981) Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience 31:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skead CJ (1980) Historical mammal incidence in the Cape Province, vol 1. Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  85. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernandez-M JF, Kuhn B (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11:1657–1668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. South African Frog Re-assessment Group (SA-FRoG), IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2010) Capensibufo rosei. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T3776A10070549. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T3776A10070549.en. Accessed 21 November 2016
  88. Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:15261–15264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL et al (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346:241–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walpole M, Almond REA, Besançon C, Butchart SHM, Campbell-Lendrum D, Carr GM, Collen B, Collette L, Davidson NC, Dulloo E, Fazel AM, Galloway JN, Gill M, Goverse T, Hockings M, Leaman DJ, Morgan DHW, Revenga C, Rickwood CJ, Schutyser F, Simons S, Stattersfield AJ, Tyrrell TD, Vié JC, Zimsky M (2009) Tracking progress toward the 2010 biodiversity target and beyond. Science 325:1503–1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang J, Whitlock MC, Anderson EC et al (2003) Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. Genetics 163:429–446PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang J, Santiago E, Caballero A (2016) Prediction and estimation of effective population size. Heredity 117:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evol Int J Org Evol 38:1358–1370Google Scholar
  96. Wilkinson JW, Beebee TJC, Giffiths RA (2007) Conservation genetics of an island toad: Bufo bufo in Jersey. Herpetol J 17:192–198Google Scholar
  97. Willoughby JR, Sundaram M, Wijayawardena BK, Kimble SJA, Ji Y, Fernandez NB, Antonides JD, Lamb MC, Marra NC, DeWoody JA (2015) The reduction of genetic diversity in threatened vertebrates and new recommendations regarding IUCN conservation rankings. Biol Conserv 191:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Wu X-B, Hu Y-L (2010) Genetic diversity and molecular differentiation of Chinese toad based on microsatellite markers. Mol Biol Rep 37:2379–2386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South African National Biodiversity InstituteKirstenbosch Research CentreCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Botany and ZoologyUniversity of StellenboschMatielandSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Zoology, Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife ConservationUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations