The application of non-invasive genetic tagging reveals new insights into the clay lick use by macaws in the Peruvian Amazon
- 349 Downloads
Genetic tagging, the unique identification of individuals by their DNA profile, has proven to be an effective method for research on several animal species. In this study we apply non-invasive genetic tagging from feather samples to reveal the genetic structure and estimate local population size of red-and-green macaws (Ara chloropterus) without the need to capture these animals. The study was centered in the Tambopata region of the Peruvian Amazon. Here macaws frequently visit clay licks and their naturally molted feathers provide a unique source of non-invasively sampled DNA. We analyzed 249 feathers using nine microsatellite loci and identified 221 unique genotypes. The remainder revealed 21 individuals which were ‘recaptured’ one or more times. Using a capture-mark-recapture model the average number of different individuals visiting clay licks within one breeding season was estimated to fall between 84 and 316 individuals per clay lick. Analysis of population genetic structure revealed only small genetic differences among regions and clay licks, suggesting a single red-and-green macaw genetic population. Our study confirms the utility of non-invasive genetic tagging in harsh tropical environment to obtain crucial population parameters about an abundant parrot species that is very difficult to capture in the wild.
KeywordsParrot Ara chloropterus Clay lick Feather Genetic tagging Microsatellite CMR
This research was supported by funds from the Rufford Small Grants Foundation, Loro Parque Foundation, Idea Wild, and The Australian National University. Thanks to the Peruvian crew of this project for their enormous help with sample collection and field logistics: Braulio Poje Mishaja, Andres Veras, Jerico Solis, Crissel Vargas, Lizzie Ortiz, Gabriela Vigo, Nancy Carlos, Mabe Aguirre, Gustavo Martinez, the full staff and guides of Rainforest Expeditions, and the volunteers of the Tambopata Macaw Project. Thanks to George Powell and the WWF for providing some extra feather samples from Peru. Thanks for laboratory technical support to Christine Hayes and Cintia Garai. We thank for the laboratory space provided by the Unidad de Biotecnología Molecular, Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in Lima, Peru. Samples were collected under research permits from the Servicio Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (SERNANP) in Peru. Genetic access to the samples was granted by the Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre (SERFOR) in Peru. CITES permits were provided by the Peruvian and Australian authorities (No 15PE000448/SP, No PWS2015-AU-001508). We thank to the anonymous reviewers whose constructive suggestions and comments improved the quality of this paper.
- Brightsmith DJ, Aramburú Muñoz-Najar R (2004) Avian Geophagy and soil characteristics in Southeastern Peru. Biotropica 36:534–543Google Scholar
- Burger J, Gochfeld M (2003) Parrot behavior at a Rio Manu (Peru) clay lick: temporal patterns, associations and antipredator responses. Acta Ethol 6:23–34Google Scholar
- Conover T (2003) Perú’s long haul: highway to riches, or ruin? Natl Geogr 203:80–100Google Scholar
- Forshaw JM (2011) Parrots of the world. vol Accessed from http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn4839547. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood
- IUCN (2014) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
- Jacob G, Debrunner R, Gugerli F, Schmid B, Bollmann K (2009) Field surveys of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in the Swiss Alps underestimated local abundance of the species as revealed by genetic analyses of non-invasive samples. Conserv Genet 11:33–44. doi: 10.1007/s10592-008-9794-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marques ARdO (2010) Caracterização da estrutura genética populacional das araras vermelhas Ara chloropterus e Ara macao (Psittaciformes, Aves). University of São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
- May DL (2001) Grey parrots of the Congo basin forest. PsittaScene 13:8–10Google Scholar
- Mollet P, Kéry M, Gardner B, Pasinelli G, Royle JA (2015) Estimating population size for capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) with spatial capture-recapture models based on genotypes from one field sample. PLoS ONE 10:e0129020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129020 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Munn CA (1992) Macaw biology and ecotourism, or “When a bird in the bush is worth two in the hand”. In: Beissinger SR, Snyder NFR, Munn CA (eds) New world parrots in crisis: solutions from conservation biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 47–72Google Scholar
- Nycander E, Blanco DH, Holle KM, del Campo A, Munn CA, Moscoso JI, Ricalde DG (1995) Manu and Tambopata: nesting success and techniques for increasing reproduction in wild macaws in southeastern Peru. In: Abramson J, Spear BL, Thomsen JB (eds) The large macaws: their care, breeding and conservation. Raintree Publications, Fort Bragg, California, pp 423–443Google Scholar
- Rudnick JA, Katzner TE, Bragin EA, Rhodes OE, Dewoody JA (2005) Using naturally shed feathers for individual identification, genetic parentage analyses, and population monitoring in an endangered Eastern imperial eagle (Aquila heliaca) population from Kazakhstan. Mol Ecol 14:2959–2967. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02641.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruibal M, Peakall R, Claridge A, Murray A, Firestone K (2010) Advancement to hair-sampling surveys of a medium-sized mammal: DNA-based individual identification and population estimation of a rare Australian marsupial, the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus). Wildlife Research 37:27–38. doi: 10.1071/WR09087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt KL (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns of genetic variation in scarlet macaws (Ara macao): implications for population management in La Selva Maya, Central America. Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wunderle JM Jr (1999) Pre- and post-hurricane fruit availability: implications for Puerto Rican Parrots in the Luquillo Mountains. Carib J Sci 35:249–264Google Scholar