Abstract
Habitat fragmentation hinders the dispersal process, which, in turn, causes changes to the genetic variability of populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fragmentation on the genetic population features of the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius), a small rodent living in forest habitats, using seven microsatellite loci. We compared (i) the genetic variability and population structure, (ii) the scale of the spatial structuring, and (iii) the possible presence and effect of a sex-biased dispersal in two populations living, respectively, in a continuous and in a fragmented landscape in central Italy. Although all microsatellite loci were always polymorphic, in the fragmented population the observed heterozygosity was usually lower than expected, and 5 out of 7 loci were not at Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium. The fragmented population was found to be strongly structured. These results showed that there was a hindrance of the gene flow between subpopulations, and in some cases even a virtual ecological isolation, as confirmed by the absence of covariation between the pairwise genetic and Euclidean distances. Some clues of female-biased dispersal were found, but even the dispersing sex showed dispersal problems in several cases. The strong differences in the genetic features between the continuous and fragmented population, indicate that the hazel dormouse strongly suffers from habitat fragmentation. This happens even when several neighbouring habitats remnants persist and remain partially connected by verges along crop fields. Thus, the fragmented landscape needs urgent measures to restore ecological connectivity through a more effective management plan of the hedgerows network.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amori G, Cantini M, Rota V (1995) Distribution and conservation of Italian dormice. Proceedings of the II conference in dormice. Hystrix (n.s.), vol 6, pp 331–336
Amori G, Hutterer R, Kryštufek B, Yigit N, Mitsain G, Meinig H, Juškaitis R (2008) Muscardinus avellanarius. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2008: e.T13992A4379741. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T13992A4379741.en (Accessed 25 July 2016)
Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 11:155–165. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x
Banks SC, Peakall R (2012) Genetic spatial autocorrelation can readily detect sex-biased dispersal. Mol Ecol 21:2092–2105. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05485.x
Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2012) Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5:117–129. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x
Bright PW (1998) Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Anim Behav 56:1485–1490. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0921
Bright PW, Morris PA (1984) Animal translocation for conservation: performance of dormice in relation to release techniques, origin and season. J Appl Ecol 31:699–708
Bright PW, Morris PA (1990) Habitat requirements of dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in relation to woodland management in southwest England. Biol Conserv 54:307–326. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(90)90143-D
Bright PW, Morris PA (1991) Ranging and nesting behaviour of the dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, in diverse low-growing woodland. J Zool 224:177–190. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb04797.x
Bright PW, Morris PA (1996) Why are dormice rare—a case study in conservation biology. Mammal Rev 26:189–195. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00151.x
Büchner S (2008) Dispersal of common dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in a habitat mosaic. Acta Theriol 53:259–262. doi:10.1007/BF03193122
Chanin P, Gubert L (2011) Surveying Hazel Dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) with tubes and boxes: a comparison. The Mammal Society, London, Mammal Notes
Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature 337:70–72. doi:10.1038/337070a0
Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014
Crnokrack P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885530
Cuushman AS (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on Amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031
Dondina O, Kataoka L, Orioli V, Bani L (2016) How to manage hedgerows as effective ecological corridors for mammals: a two-species approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:283–290. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.005
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14(2611):2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Favre L, Balloux F, Goudet J, Perrin N (1997) Female-biased dispersal in the monogamous mammal Crocidura russula: evidence from field data and microsatellite patterns. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 264:127–132. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0019
Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2006) Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics 174:875–891. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.059451
Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gaublomme E, Maebe K, Van Doninck K, Dhuyvetter H, Li X, Desender K, Hendrickx F (2013) Loss of genetic diversity and increased genetic structuring in response to forest area reduction in a ground dwelling insect: a case study of the flightless carabid beetle Carabus problematicus (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Insect Conserv Divers 6:473–482. doi:10.1111/icad.12002
Gauffre B, Petit E, Brodier S, Bretagnolle V, Cosson JF (2009) Sex-biased dispersal patterns depend on the spatial scale in a social rodent. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:3487–3494. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0881
Gemayel R, Vinces MD, Legendre M, Verstrepen KJ (2010) Variable tandem repeats accelerate evolution of coding and regulatory sequences. Ann Rev Genet 44:445–477. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-072610-155046
Giplin ME, Soulé ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinctions. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 19–34
Goudet J, Jombart T (2015) hierfstat: estimation and tests of hierarchical F-Statistics. R package version 0.04–22. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hierfstat
Goudet J, De Meeüs T, Day AJ, Gliddon CJ (1994) The different levels of population structuring of the Dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus, along the South Devon Coast. In: Beaumont AR (ed) Genetic and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 81–95
Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Mol Ecol 11:1103–1114. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01496.x
Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5
Handley LJL, Perrin N (2007) Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal. Mol Ecol 16:1559–1578
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8278.2002.00305.x
Harmon LJ, Braude S (2010) Conservation of small populations: effective population sizes, inbreeding, and the 50/500 rule. In: Braude S, Low BS (eds) An introduction to methods and models in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 125–138
Harrison HB, Saenz-Agudelo P, Planes S, Jones GP, Berumen ML (2013) Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 22:1158–1170
Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Herdegen M, Radwan J, Sobczynska U, Dabert M, Konjević D, Schlichter J, Jurczyszyn M (2015) Population structure of edible dormouse in Poland: the role of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. J Zool 298:217–224. doi:10.1111/jzo.12304
Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70. doi:10.2307/4615733
Jombart T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
Jombart T (2014) A tutorial for discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) using adegenet 1.4-1. Available at: http://adegenet.r-forge.r-project.org/files/tutorial-dapc.pdf (Accessed on 21 January 2016)
Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521
Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:95. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/11/94
Juškaitis R (1997) Winter mortality of the common dormouse in Lithuania. Folia Zool 48:11–16
Juškaitis R (1999) Life tables for the common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius in Lithuania. Acta Theriol 44:465–470. doi:10.4098/AT.arch.99-44
Juškaitis R (2007) Habitat selection in the common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius in Lithuania. Baltic For 13:89–95
Juškaitis R (2008) The common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius: ecology, population structure and dynamics. Institute of Ecology of Vilnius University Publishers, Vilnius, Lituania
Kauer M, Dieringer D, Schlotterer C (2003) Nonneutral admixture of immigrant genotypes in African Drosophila melanogaster populations from Zimbabwe. Mol Biol Evol 20:1329–1337. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg148
Lancaster ML, Taylor AC, Cooper SJ, Carthew SM (2011) Limited ecological connectivity of an arboreal marsupial across a forest/plantation landscape despite apparent resilience to fragmentation. Mol Ecol 20:2258–2271. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05072.x
Lewontin RC (1964) The interaction of selection and Linkage. II. Optimum models. Genetics 50:757–782
Lowe WH, Allendorf FW (2010) What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol Ecol 19:3038–3051. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04688.x
Luikart G, Cornuet J-M, Allendorf FW (1999) Temporal changes in allele frequencies provide estimates of population bottleneck size. Conserv Biol 13:523–530. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98133.x
Mabry KE, Shelley EL, Davis KE, Blumstein DT, Van Vuren DH, Waterman JM (2013) Social mating system and sex-biased dispersal in mammals and birds: a phylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e57980
Mills CA (2012) Conservation and ecology of the hazel dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius. PhD thesis in Biological Sciences, University of Exeter
Morris P (2004) Dormice. Stowmarket, Whittet Books, Stansted, UK
Mortelliti A, Santulli Sanzo G, Boitani L (2009) Species’ surrogacy for conservation planning: caveats from comparing the response of three arboreal rodents to habitat loss and fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 18:1131–1145. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9477-2
Mortelliti A, Amori G, Capizzi D, Cervone C, Fagiani S, Pollini B, Boitani L (2011) Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents. J Appl Ecol 48:163–172. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01918.x
Mortelliti A, Santarelli L, Sozio G, Fagiani S, Boitani L (2013) Long distance field crossings by Hazel Dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in fragmented landscapes. Mamm Biol 78:309–312. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.006
Mortelliti A, Sozio G, Driscoll DA, Bani L, Boitani L, Lindenmayer DB (2014) Population and individual-scale responses to patch size, isolation and quality in the hazel dormouse. Ecosphere 5:107. doi:10.1890/ES14-00115.1
Naim DM, Kemp SJ, Telfer S, Watts PC (2009) Isolation and characterization of 10 microsatellite loci in the common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1010–1012. doi:10.1111/ens.12095
Naim DM, Telfer S, Tatman S, Bird S, Kemp SJ, Hughes R, Watts PC (2012) Patterns of genetic divergence among populations of the common dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius in the UK. Mol Biol Rep 39:1205–1215. doi:10.1007/s11033-011-0850-y
Naim DM, Telfer S, Tatman S, Bird S, Kemp SJ, Watts PC (2014) Movement patterns and genetic diversity of wild and reintroduced common dormice, Muscardinus avellanarius. Genet Mol Res 13:167–181. doi:10.4238/2014
Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00227.x
Panchetti F, Carpaneto G (2005) Nest site selection by common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in a coastal evergreen scrub forest of Central Italy. 6th international conference on dormice. University of Podlasie in Siedlce, Centre for Ecological Research Polish Academy of Sciences in Dziekanów Leśny. http://hdl.handle.net/11590/271423
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
Perrin N, Goudet J (2001) Inbreeding, kinship and the evolution of natal dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 123–142
Perrin N, Mazalov V (2000) Local competition, inbreeding and the evolution of sex–biased dispersal. Am Nat 155:116–127. doi:10.1086/303296
Pisa G, Orioli V, Spilotros G, Fabbri E, Randi E, Bani L (2015) Detecting a hierarchical genetic population structure: the case study of the Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra) in Northern Italy. Ecol Evol 5:743–758. doi:10.1002/ece3.1335
Price K, Boutin S (1993) Territorial bequeathal by red squirrel mothers. Behav Ecol 4:144–150
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly PJ (2000) Inference of population Structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
Pritchard, JK, Wen X, Falush D (2010) Documentation for STRUCTURE software. [Documentation file]. Available at http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html (Accessed on 21 January 2016)
Prugnolle F, de Meeus T (2002) Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity 88:161–165
Pusey AE (1987) Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 2:295–299. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(87)90081-4
Qiu D (2014) snpar: supplementary non-parametric statistics methods. R package version 1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=snpar
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0
Rondinini C, Battistoni A, Peronace V, Teofili C (2013) Lista Rossa IUCN dei Vertebrati Italiani [IUCN Red List of Italian Vertebrates]. Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Roma (in Italian)
Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from f-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
Rousset F (2015) Genepop 4.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X. Technical document available at: http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/~rousset/Genepop.htm (Accessed on 21 January 2016)
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279. doi:10.2307/2410134
Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x
Studier JA, Keppler KJ (1988) A note on the neighbor-joining algorithm of Saitou and Nei. Mol Biol Evol 5:729–731
Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G, Richardson DM (2005) The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 11:173–181. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00156.x
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Microchecker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
Verbeylen G (2012) Monitoring and a population study of the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Flanders (Belgium). Peckiana 8:95–102
Watts PC, Rouquette JR, Saccheri IJ, Kemp SJ, Thompson DJ (2004) Molecular and ecological evidence for small-scale isolation by distance in an endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale. Mol Ecol 13:2931–2945. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02300.x
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370. doi:10.2307/2408641
Zapponi L, Del Bianco M, Luiselli L, Catorci A, Bologna MA (2012) Assessing environmental requirements effects on forest fragmentation sensitivity in two arboreal rodents. Mamm Biol 78:157–163. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.08.005
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Alice Mouton for providing us with the modified primer sequence of species-specific microsatellite markers of the hazel dormouse. We thank Dr. Matteo Bonetti for language revision. This study was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Milano-Bicocca. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions that greatly contribute to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bani, L., Orioli, V., Pisa, G. et al. Population genetic structure and sex-biased dispersal of the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in a continuous and in a fragmented landscape in central Italy. Conserv Genet 18, 261–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0898-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0898-2