Conservation Genetics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 239–249 | Cite as

The application of genomics to inform conservation of a functionally important reef fish (Scarus niger) in the Philippines

  • Brian L. StockwellEmail author
  • Wesley A. Larson
  • Ryan K. Waples
  • Rene A. Abesamis
  • Lisa W. Seeb
  • Kent E. Carpenter
Research Article


Coral reefs within the Coral Triangle (CT) are home to the greatest marine diversity on the globe and are an important supplier of marine resources to densely populated coastal regions. Many coral reefs within the CT and around the world are under threat from over-exploitation. Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been proven to be effective tools in restoring fish stocks. However, the role that MPAs play in promoting connectivity at greater distances through larval dispersal is still unknown. RADseq was used to discover 4253 SNPs from 81 individuals of the dusky parrotfish (Scarus niger) collected from three sites within the Philippines. A lack of population structure suggested a high rate of gene flow (F ST = 0.007). Estimates of Ne from linkage disequilibrium are relatively large, ranging from 1200 to 2000. A sibling analysis revealed one pair of well-supported full siblings (r = 0.773) and one pair of putative half siblings (r = 0.191) between sites separated by more than 500 km. The low F ST values indicate a high degree of gene flow between the reefs within the sampling area while the sibling analysis suggests demographic connectivity between the Sibuyan Sea and the Sulu Sea. The Mindoro–Panay throughflow is a likely vector by which larvae are transported between these sites, suggesting that reefs in Romblon are sources for reefs near Basay, 400 km to the south. Given the reliance of a vast majority of coral reef fishes on larval dispersal, this study reveals that MPAs established within the central Philippines can supply varying levels of larvae to overfished reefs.


Parrotfish Population genetics Restriction site associated DNA sequencing Single nucleotide polymorphism Larval connectivity Marine protected areas 



We are thankful for the Philippine National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI) and Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Research (BFAR) assistance in granting collection permits (0208/FRP/SM/IX/2009). We thank Silliman University and particularly Hilconida Calumpong for providing laboratory space. This work was supported by NSF-PIRE (OISE-0,730,256) grant to KE Carpenter and PH Barber and by GIZ ACCCoast (No. 83099096). Additional funding was provided by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to LWS. WAL was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant # DGE-0718124). The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of those organizations. We would like to thank individuals that aided in fieldwork and collection of samples, including K Hachenberg, CR Jadloc, O Paderanga and A Scalabrin. We would like to thank Seeb Lab members Carita Pascal and Marissa Jones for lab instruction and Jim Seeb for comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10592_2015_776_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (433 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 432 kb)
10592_2015_776_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (802 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 801 kb)


  1. Ackiss AS, Pardede S, Crandall ED, Ablan-Lagman MCA, Ambariyanto Romena N, Barber PH, Carpenter KE (2013) Pronounced genetic structure in a highly mobile coral reef fish, Caesio cuning, in the Coral Triangle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 480:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcala AC (1988) Effects of marine reserves on coral fish abundances and yields of Philippine coral reefs. Ambio 17:194–199Google Scholar
  3. Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11(10):697–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almany GR, Hamilton RJ, Bode M, Matawai M, Potuku T, Saez-Agudelo P, Planes S, Berumen ML, Rhodes KL, Thorrold SR, Russ GR, Jones GP (2013) Dispersal of grouper larvae drives local resource sharing in a coral reef fishery. Curr Biol 23(7):626–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson EC, Dunham KK (2008) The influence of family groups on inferences made with the program Structure. Mol Ecol Resour 8(6):1219–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bay LK, Choat JH, van Herwerden L, Robertson DR (2004) High genetic diversities and complex genetic structure in an Indo-Pacific tropical reef fish (Chlorurus sordidus): evidence of an unstable evolutionary past? Mar Biol 144(4):757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Environ Biol Fishes 28:189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bierne N, Roze D, Welch JJ (2013) Pervasive selection or is it…? Why are FST outliers sometimes so frequent? Mol Ecol 22(8):2061–2064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke L, Reytar K, Spalding M, Perry A (2012) Reefs at risk: revisted in the Coral Triangle. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Candy JR, Campbell NR, Grinnell MH, Beacham, TD, Larson WA, Narum SR (2015) Population differentiation determined from putative neutral and divergent adaptive genetic markers in Eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus, Osmeridae), an anadromous Pacific smelt. Mol Ecol Resour. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12400
  13. Catchen JM, Amores AHP, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH (2011) Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. Genes Genomes Genet G3:171–182Google Scholar
  14. Cowen RK, Paris CB, Srinivasan A (2006) Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311(5760):522–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 14:209–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudgeon CL, Gust N, Blair D (2000) No apparent genetic basis to demographic differences in scarid fishes across continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 137:1059–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards CB, Friedlander AM, Green AG, Hardt MJ, Sala E, Sweatman HP, Williams ID, Zgliczynski B, Sandin SA, Smith JE (2014) Global assessment of the status of coral reef herbivorous fishes: evidence for fishing effects. Proc Biol Sci 281(1774):20131835PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans RD, Russ GR, Kritzer JP (2008) Batch fecudnity of Lutjanus carponotatus (Lutjanidae) and implications of no-take marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 27:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Everett MV, Miller MR, Seeb JE (2012) Meiotic maps of sockeye salmon derived from massively parallel DNA sequencing. BMC Genom 13:521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10(3):564–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Excoffier L, Hofer T, Foll M (2009) Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity 103(4):285–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitzpatrick JM, Carlon DB, Lippe C, Robertson DR (2011) The West Pacific diversity hotspot as a source or sink for new species? Population genetic insights from the Indo-Pacific parrotfish Scarus rubroviolaceus. Mol Ecol 20(2):219–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2008) A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:977–993PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gell FR, Roberts CM (2003) Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 18(9):448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon AL, Sprintall J, Ffield A (2011) Regional oceanography of the Philippine Archipelago. Oceanography 24(1):14–27. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2011.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goudet J, Raymond M, deMeeus T, Rousset F (1996) Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933–1940PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Green AL, Fernandes L, Almany G, Abesamis R, McLeod Alino PM, White AT, Salm R, Tanzer J, Pressey RL (2014) Designing marine reserves for fisheries management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change adaptation. Coast Manag 42:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruenthal KM, Witting DA, Ford T, Neuman MJ, Williams JP, Pondella DJ II, Bird A, Caruso N, Hyde JR, Seeb LW, Larson WA (2014) Development and application of genomic tools to the restoration of green abalone in southern California. Conserv Genet 15:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halpern BS, Lester SE, McLeod KL (2010) Placing marine protected areas onto the ecosystem-based management seascape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(43):18312–18317PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Han W, Moore AM, Levin J, Zhang B, Arango HG, Curchitser E, Lorenso ED, Gordon AL, Lin J (2009) Seasonal surface ocean circulation and dynamics in the Philippine Archipelago region during 2004-2008. Dyn Atmos Oceans 47:114–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen MM, Nielsen EE, Mensberg KL (1997) The problem of sampling families rather than populations: relatedness among individuals in samples of juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta L. Mol Ecol 6(5):469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison HB, Williamson DH, Evans RD, Almany GR, Thorrold SR, Russ GR, Feldheim KA, van Herwerden L, Planes S, Srinivasan M, Berumen ML, Jones GP (2012) Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries. Curr Biol 22:1023–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill WG (1981) Estimation of effective population-size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet Res 38:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoegh-Guldberg GH, Veron JEN, Green A, Gomez ED, Lough J, King M, Ambariyanto, Hansen L, Cinner J, Dews G, Russ G, Schuttenberg HZ, Peñaflor EL, Eakin CM, Christensen TRL, Abbey M, Areki F, Kosaka RA, Tewfik A, Oliver J (2009) The Coral Triangle and climate change: ecosystems, people and societies at risk. WWF Australia, Bribane.
  35. Hogan JD, Thiessen RJ, Sale PF, Heath DD (2012) Local retention, dispersal and fluctuating connectivity among populations of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 168:61–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horigue V, Alino PM, Pressey RL (2014) Evaluating management performance of marine protected area networks in the Philippines. Ocean Coast Manag 95:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Houk P, Rhodes K, Cuetos-Bueno J, Lindfield S, Fread V, McIlwain JL (2011) Commercial coral-reef fisheries across Micronesia: a need for improving management. Coral Reefs 31(1):13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ishihara T, Tachihara K (2011) Pelagic larval duration and settlment size of Apogonidae, Labridae, Scaridae, and Tripterygiidae species in a coral lagoon of Okinawa Island, southern Japan. Pac Sci 65:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jombart T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones GP, Almany GR, Russ GR, Sale PF, Steneck RS, Oppen MJH, Willis BL (2009) Larval retention and connectivity among populations of corals and reef fishes: history, advances and challenges. Coral Reefs 28(2):307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes 6:576–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kritzer JP, Sale PF (2004) Metapopulation ecology in the sea: from Levins’ model to marine ecology and fisheries science. Fish Fish 5:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larson WA, Seeb LW, Everett MV, Waples RK, Templin WD, Seeb JE (2014) Genotyping by sequencing resolves shallow population structure to inform conservation of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Evol Appl 7(3):355–369PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered 43:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lotterhos KE, Whitlock MC (2014) Evaluation of demographic history and neutral parameterization on the performance of FST outlier tests. Mol Ecol 23(9):2178–2192PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152(4):1753–1766PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Magsino RM, Juinio-Meñez MA (2008) The influence of contrasting life history traits and oceanic processes on genetic structuring of rabbitfish populations Siganus argenteus and Siganus fuscescens along the eastern Philippine coasts. Mar Biol 154(3):519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLeod E, Salm R, Green A, Almany J (2009) Designing marine protected area networks to address the impacts of climate change. Front Ecol Environ 7:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milligan BG (2003) Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics 163(3):1153–1167PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Minoche AE, Dohm JC, Himmelbauer H (2011) Evaluation of genomic high-throughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and genome analyzer systems. Genome Biol 12(11):R112PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mora C, Andréfouët S, Costello MJ, Kranenburg C, Rollo A, Veron J (2006) Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 312:1750–1751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Narum SR, Hess JE (2011) Comparison of FST outlier tests for SNP loci under selection. Mol Ecol Resour 11(s1):184–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patterson HM, Swearer SE (2007) Long-distance dispersal and local retention of larvae as mechanisms of recruitment in an island population of a coral reef fish. Austral Ecol 32:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peel D, Waples RS, Macbeth GM, Do C, Ovenden JR (2013) Accounting for missing data in the estimation of contemporary genetic effective population size (Ne). Mol Ecol Resour 13:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pelc RA, Warner RR, Gaines SD, Paris CB (2010) Detecting larval export from marine reserves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(43):18266–18271PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pew J, Muir PH, Wang J, Frasier TR (2015) related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominat molecular markers. Mol Ecol Resour 15:557–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Puebla O, Bermingham E, McMillan WO (2012) On the spatial scale of dispersal in coral reef fishes. Mol Ecol 21(23):5675–5688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using molecular markers. Evolution 43:258–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raynal JM, Crandall ED, Barber PH, Mahardika GN, Lagman MC, Carpenter KE (2014) Basin isolation and oceanographic features influencing lineage diversification in the humbug damselfish (Dascyllus aruanus) in the Coral Triangle. Bull Mar Sci 90(1):513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rhodes KL, Tupper MH, Wichilmel CB (2007) Characterization and management of the commercial sector of the Pohnpei coral reef fishery, Micronesia. Coral Reefs 27(2):443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67(02):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roesti M, Salzburger W, Berner D (2012) Uninformative polymorphisms bias genome scans for signatures of selection. BMC Evol Biol 12(1):94PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘ 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Russ GR (2002) Yet another review of marine reserves as reef fisheries management tools. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 421–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sale PF, Cowen RK, Danilowicz BS, Jones GP, Kritzer JP, Lindeman KC, Planes S, Polunin NV, Russ GR, Sadovy YJ, Steneck RS (2005) Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 20(2):74–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236(4803):787–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steneck RS, Paris CB, Arnold MC, Ablan-Lagman MC, Alcala AC, Butler MJ, McCook LJ, Russ GR, Sale PF (2009) Thinking and managing outside the box: coalescing connectivity networks to build region-wide resilience in coral reef ecosystems. Coral Reefs 28:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stockwell B, Jadloc CRL, Abesamis RA, Alcala AC, Russ GR (2009) Trophic and benthic responses to no-take marine reserve protection in the Philippines. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 389:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the world. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  72. Visram S, Yang MC, Pillay RM, Said S, Henriksson O, Grahn M, Chen CA (2010) Genetic connectivity and historical demography of the blue barred parrotfish (Scarus ghobban) in the western Indian Ocean. Mar Biol 157(7):1475–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang J (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160(3):1203–1215PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang J (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res 89(03):135–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang J (2009) A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes. Mol Ecol 18:2148–2164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waples RS (2006) A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv Genet 7:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White AT, Alino PM, Cros A, Fatan NA, Green AL, Teoh SJ, Laroya L, Peterson N, Tan S, Tighe S, Vengas-Li R, Walton A, Wen W (2014) MArine protected areas in the Coral Triangle: progress, Issues, and Options. Coast Manag 42:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Willette DA, Allendorf FW, Barber PH, Barshis DJ, Carpenter KE, Crandall ED, Cresko WA, Fernandez-Silva I, Matz MV, Meyer E, Santos MD, Seeb LW, Seeb JE (2014) So, you want to use next-generation sequencing in marine systems? Insight from the Pan-Pacific Advanced Studies Institute. Bull Mar Sci 90(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams I, Polunin N (2014) Large-scale associations between macroalgal cover and grazer biomass on mid-depth reefs in the Caribbean. Coral Reefs 19(4):358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.School of Aquatic and Fisheries SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental ManagementDumaguetePhilippines

Personalised recommendations