Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1329–1337 | Cite as

Differences in heritable trait variation among populations of varying size in the perennial herb Phyteuma spicatum

  • Anne WeberEmail author
  • Annette Kolb
Research Article

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation may affect trait evolution in plants through changes in the environment. Evolutionary change, however, may be limited when fragmented populations suffer from genetic or environmental deterioration. In this study, we examined the potential of plants in fragmented populations to respond to altered selective pressures by estimating the amount of heritable variation in several phenotypic traits, using Phyteuma spicatum as study species. We grew offspring of plants of ten natural populations of varying size under common environmental conditions and assessed if population trait means or heritability estimates were related to the size and abiotic environmental conditions of the populations of origin. All traits differed significantly among populations and maternal families, suggesting that genetic effects were responsible for the observed trait variation. Narrow-sense heritabilities (h 2 ) ranged between 0 and 1.13, depending on trait and population of origin. Size and/or environmental conditions of the populations of origin affected means and h 2 -estimates of some of the measured traits. Heritabilities for flowering duration and mean seed mass decreased with decreasing population size, suggesting that plants in small populations may have a reduced capacity to respond and adapt to changes in the environment which alter selective pressures on these traits. Still, mean h 2 -estimates were in some cases low, and patterns were generally quite variable. Further studies are therefore needed to gain more conclusive insights into the adaptive potential of small plant populations. Such knowledge is important if we want to understand how habitat fragmentation and associated changes in the environment affect trait evolution.

Keywords

Narrow-sense heritability Abiotic environmental conditions Plant phenotypic traits Population size Quantitative genetic differentiation (QST

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dirk Enters, Katharina Filzen, Isgard Lemke, Henrike Schlösser, Anja Schnorfeil, Katrin Steffen, Dörthe Wagner, Stephan Wehling, Helen Wittler and Roland Wozniewski for their assistance in the field and/or lab, the Wülpern family for access to their forest, Angelika Trambacz and Werner Vogel for help in the greenhouse and common garden, and Jon Ågren and Stefan Michalski for help with the data analyses. This study was financially supported by the German Research Foundation “DFG” (KO 3577/3-1 to A.K.).

Supplementary material

10592_2014_620_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Ågren J, Ehrlén J, Solbreck C (2008) Spatio-temporal variation in fruit production and seed predation in a perennial herb influenced by habitat quality and population size. J Ecol 96:334–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed in April 2013
  3. Bodbyl-Roels SA, Kelly JK (2011) Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65:2541–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booy G, Hendriks RJJ, Smulders MJM, Van Groenendael JM, Vosman B (2000) Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plant Biol 2:379–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruso CM, Peterson SB, Ridley CE (2003) Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation. Am J Bot 90:1333–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charmantier A, Garant D (2005) Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc R Soc B 272:1415–1425PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheptou PO, Carrue O, Rouifed S, Cantarel A (2008) Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. PNAS 105:3796–3799PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colling G, Matthies D (2004) The effects of plant population size on the interactions between the endangered plant Scorzonera humilis, a specialised herbivore, and a phytopathogenic fungus. Oikos 105:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudley SA (1996) Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellmer M, Prentice HC, Andersson S (2011) The structuring of quantitative genetic variation in a fragmented population of Briza media (Poaceae). Evol Ecol 25:509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} Companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. Accessed in April 2013
  15. Hof L, Keizer LCP, Elberse IAM, Dolstra O (1999) A model describing the flowering of single plants, and the heritability of flowering traits of Dimorphotheca pluvialis. Euphytica 110:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffmeister TS, Vet LEM, Biere A, Holsinger K, Filser J (2005) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biological invasion and habitat fragmentation. Ecosystems 8:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huber R (1988) Biosystematische untersuchungen an Phyteuma spicatum und Phyteuma ovatum. Dissertation, University of Zurich, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacquemyn H, De Meester L, Jongejans E, Honnay O (2012) Evolutionary changes in plant reproductive traits following habitat fragmentation and their consequences for population fitness. J Ecol 100:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson MTJ, Agrawal AA, Maron JL, Salminen J-P (2009) Heritability, covariation and natural selection on 24 traits of common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) from a field experiment. J Evol Biol 22:1295–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jump AS, Peñuelas J (2005) Running to stand still: adaption and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett 8:1010–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jump AS, Marchant R, Peñuelas J (2009) Environmental change and the option value of genetic diversity. Trends Plant Sci 14:51–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelm H-J (1994) Zur Waldgeschichte des Elbe-Weser-Dreiecks. Norddeutsche Naturschutzakademie Berichte 7:50–59Google Scholar
  23. Kolb A (2005) Reduced reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum. J Ecol 93:1226–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolb A (2008) Habitat fragmentation reduces plant fitness by disturbing pollination and modifying response to herbivory. Biol Conserv 141:2540–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolb A, Diekmann M (2004) Effects of environment, habitat configuration and forest continuity on the distribution of forest plant species. J Veg Sci 15:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolb A, Durka W (2013) Reduced genetic variation mainly affects early rather than late life-cycle stages. Biol Conserv 159:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolb A, Ehrlén J (2010) Environmental context drives seed predator-mediated selection on a floral display trait. Evol Ecol 24:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolb A, Dahlgren JP, Ehrlén J (2010) Population size affects vital rates but not population growth rate of a perennial plant. Ecology 91:3210–3217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Majetic CJ, Raguso RA, Ashman T-L (2009) The sweet smell of success: floral scent affects pollinator attraction and seed fitness in Hesperis matronalis. Funct Ecol 23:480–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazer SJ, Delesalle VA (1996) Floral trait variation in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae): ontogenetic, maternal family, and population effects. Heredity 77:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazer SJ, Paz H, Bell MD (2004) Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently? Am J Bot 91:2041–2050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J Evol Biol 14:892–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moeller DA, Geber MA (2005) Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59:786–799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Muola A, Mutikainen P, Lilley M, Laukkanen L, Salminen J-P, Leimu R (2010) Associations of plant fitness, leaf chemistry, and damage suggest selection mosaic in plant-herbivore interactions. Ecology 91:2650–2659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murúa M, Espinoza C, Bustamante R, Marín VH, Medel R (2010) Does human-induced habitat transformation modify pollinator-mediated selection? A case study in Viola portalesia (Violaceae). Oecologia 163:153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oostermeijer JGB, Luijten SH, den Nijs JCM (2003) Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation. Biol Conserv 113:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ouborg NJ, van Teuren R, van Damme JMM (1991) The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. II. Morphological variation and fitness components in populations of varying size of Salvia pratensis L. and Scabiosa columbaria L. Oecologia 86:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Primack RB (2006) Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed in November 2012
  41. Revelle W (2012) Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. http://personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf. Accessed in April 2013
  42. Roach DA, Wulff RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandring S, Ågren J (2009) Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution 63:1292–1300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwaegerle KE, Levin DA (1991) Quantitative genetics of fitness traits in a wild population of Phlox. Evolution 45:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sletvold N, Grindeland JM, Ågren J (2010) Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display, spur length and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica. New Phytol 188:385–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spitze K (1993) Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135:367–374PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Totland Ø (1999) Effects of temperature on performance and phenotypic selection on plant traits in alpine Ranunculus acris. Oecologia 120:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tscharntke T, Brandl R (2004) Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu Rev Entomol 49:405–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Waldmann P, Andersson S (1998) Comparison of quantitative genetic variation and allozyme diversity within and between populations of Scabiosa canescens and S. columbaria. Heredity 81:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weber A, Kolb A (2011) Evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation: population size and density affect selection on inflorescence size in a perennial herb. Evol Ecol 25:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber A, Kolb A (2013a) Local plant density, pollination and trait-fitness relationships in a perennial herb. Plant Biol 15:335–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber A, Kolb A (2013b) Population size, pollination and phenotypic trait selection in Phyteuma spicatum. Acta Oecol 47:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wheeler BR, Hutchings MJ (2002) Biological flora of the British Isles: Phyteuma spicatum L. J Ecol 90:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Widén B, Andersson S (1993) Quantitative genetics of life-history and morphology in a rare plant, Senecio integrifolius. Heredity 70:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Schmid B, Fischer M (2007) Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. J Evol Biol 20:534–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vegetation Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of EcologyUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.LeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations