Conservation Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1243–1257 | Cite as

Conflict in outcomes for conservation based on population genetic diversity and genetic divergence approaches: a case study in the Japanese relictual conifer Sciadopitys verticillata (Sciadopityaceae)

  • James R. P. Worth
  • Masashi Yokogawa
  • Andrés Pérez-Figueroa
  • Yoshihiko Tsumura
  • Nobuhiro Tomaru
  • Jasmine K. Janes
  • Yuji Isagi
Research Article

Abstract

A major goal of conservation genetics is to determine which specific populations are most crucial for in situ or ex situ conservation. Genetic divergence and diversity are the two foundations by which priorities for conservation are typically determined. However, these measures may be confounded when past bottlenecks reduce genetic diversity of populations but also lead to their divergence. This study examines the potential conflicts in population prioritization for a relictual Japanese endemic conifer, Sciadopitys verticillata using nuclear microsatellites. High genetic structuring at the nuclear level compared to many other conifers (Fst = 0.129) was observed across the species range along with significant differences in genetic diversity between southern and northern populations. Conflict among genetic diversity and divergence population prioritization methods was observed in populations at the southwestern range edge of Kyushu and Chugoku, which were the most genetically distinct but also harboured the lowest diversity (Kyushu, He = 0.288, Ar = 2.172, and Chugoku, He = 0.222, Ar = 2.010). These populations contained only a subset of the genetic diversity found in Central Honshu and the Kii Peninsula (Central Honshu, He = 0.347, Ar = 2.707 and the Kii Peninsula, He = 0.337, Ar = 2.683), suggesting a reduction in genetic diversity as a result of bottlenecks. To determine if these highly bottlenecked populations in southwestern Japan are on the trajectory to extinction, or, conversely, if they harbour important genetic variation that has been fixed at the southwestern edge of the species range, common garden experiments are recommended in the future.

Keywords

Sciadopitys verticillata Peripheral populations Centre of diversity Nuclear microsatellites Japanese temperate conifer Conservation genetics 

Supplementary material

10592_2014_615_MOESM1_ESM.docx (318 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 318 kb)

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Garcia-Barrios R, Lara-Moreno C, Martinez-Ramos M (1996) Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest tree species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:387–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes R, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinform 9:323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baalsrud HT (2011) Population characteristics and estimates of effective population size in a house sparrow metapopulation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 263:1619–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benkman CW (1995) Wind dispersal capacity of pine seeds and the evolution of different seed dispersal modes in pines. Oikos 73:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birky CW, Fuerst P, Maruyama T (1989) Organelle gene diversity under migration, mutation, and drift: equilibrium expectations, approach to equilibrium, effects of heteroplasmic cells, and comparison to nuclear genes. Genetics 121:613–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant D, Moulton V (2004) Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol Biol Evol 21:255–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caballero A, Rodriguez-Ramilo ST (2010) A new method for the partition of allelic diversity within and between subpopulations. Conserv Genet 11:2219–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavers S, Navarro C, Lowe AJ (2004) Targeting genetic resource conservation in widespread species: a case study of Cedrela odorata L. For Ecol Manage 197:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavers S, Degen B, Caron H, Lemes M, Margis R, Salgueiro F, Lowe A (2005) Optimal sampling strategy for estimation of spatial genetic structure in tree populations. Heredity 95:281–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornuet J, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Crisp MD, Cook LG (2011) Cenozoic extinctions account for the low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms. The New phytologist 192:997–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick CW, Abdul-Salim K, Bermingham E (2003) Molecular systematic analysis reveals cryptic tertiary diversification of a widespread tropical rain forest tree. Am Nat 162:691–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Earl DA (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckenwalder JE (2009) Conifers of the world: the complete reference. Timber Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckert C, Samis K, Lougheed S (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis J, Burke J (2007) EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 99:125–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellstrand NC, Roose ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 71(1):123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Excoffier L, Hofer T, Foll M (2009) Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity 103:285–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2008) A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:977–993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gitzendanner MA, Weekley CW, Germain-Aubrey CC, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2012) Microsatellite evidence for high clonality and limited genetic diversity in Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae), an endangered, self-incompatible shrub endemic to the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida, USA. Conserv Genet 13:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez A, Carvalho GR (2000) Sex, parthenogenesis and genetic structure of rotifers: microsatellite analysis of contemporary and resting egg bank populations. Mol Ecol 9:203–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  26. Halkett F, Simon J-C, Balloux F (2005) Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 20:194–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992) Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. Population genetics of forest trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hiraoka K, Tomaru N (2009a) Genetic divergence in nuclear genomes between populations of Fagus crenata along the Japan Sea and Pacific sides of Japan. J Plant Res 122:269–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hiraoka K, Tomaru N (2009b) Population genetic structure of Fagus japonica revealed by nuclear microsatellite markers. Int J Plant Sci 170:748–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Res 9:1322–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones RC, Steane DA, Lavery M, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2012) Multiple evolutionary processes drive the patterns of genetic differentiation in a forest tree species complex. Ecol Evol 3:1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Katsuki T, Luscombe D, Farjon A (2013) Sciadopitys verticillata. In: IUCN 2013 IUCN Red list of threatened species, www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 23 Aug 2013
  38. Kawase D, Ueno S, Tsumura Y, Tomaru N, Seo A, Yumoto T (2009) Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers for Sciadopitys verticillata (Sciadopityaceae). Conserv Genet 10:1997–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kawase D, Tsumura Y, Tomaru N, Seo A, Yumoto T (2010) Genetic structure of an endemic Japanese conifer, Sciadopitys verticillata (Sciadopityaceae), by using microsatellite markers. J Hered 101:292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Luikart G, Allendorf F, Cornuet J, Sherwin W (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Matsumoto A, Uchida K, Taguchi Y, Tani N, Tsumura Y (2010) Genetic diversity and structure of natural fragmented Chamaecyparis obtusa populations as revealed by microsatellite markers. J Plant Res 123:689–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews JV, Ovenden LE (1990) Late tertiary plant macrofossils from localities in Arctic/Subarctic North America: a review of the data. Arctic 43:364–392Google Scholar
  43. McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conserv Biol 21:297–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McPherson H, van der Merwe M, Delaney SK, Edwards MA, Henry RJ, McIntosh E, Rymer PD, Milner ML, Siow J, Rossetto M (2013) Capturing chloroplast variation for molecular ecology studies: a simple next generation sequencing approach applied to a rainforest tree. BMC Ecol 13:8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4:792–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milligan B (1992) Plant DNA isolation. In: Hoelzel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 59–88Google Scholar
  47. Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakamura Y, DellaSala D, Alaback P (2011) Temperate rainforests of Japan. In: DellaSala D (ed) Temperate and boreal rainforests of the world: ecology and conservation. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  49. Narum SR, Hess JE (2011) Comparison of FST outlier tests for SNP loci under selection. Mol Ecol Res 11:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular-data 2 Gene-frequency data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pariset L, Joost S, Marsan PA, Valentini A, Ecogene Consortium EC (2009) Landscape genomics and biased FST approaches reveal single nucleotide polymorphisms under selection in goat breeds of North-East Mediterranean. BMC Genet 10:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pérez-Figueroa A, Saura M, Fernández J, Toro M, Caballero A (2009) METAPOP—a software for the management and analysis of subdivided populations in conservation programs. Conserv Genet 10:1097–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J (1999) Computer note. Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Scotti I, Paglia G, Magni F, Morgante M (2006) Population genetics of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) at regional scale: sensitivity of different microsatellite motif classes in detecting differentiation. Ann For Sci 63:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sgro CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4:326–337CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Simaji K, Ito T (1988) Nihon no iseki shutudo mokuseihin souran. Yuzankaku Inc, Osaka, p 296Google Scholar
  60. Soto-Cerda BJ, Cloutier S (2013) Outlier loci and selection signatures of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Plant Mol Biol Rep 31(4):978–990Google Scholar
  61. Suzuki M (2002) Nihonjin to ki no bunka. Yasaka Shobou, Tokyo, p 253Google Scholar
  62. Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Takahashi T, Tani N, Taira H, Tsumura Y (2005) Microsatellite markers reveal high allelic variation in natural populations of Cryptomeria japonica near refugial areas of the last glacial period. J Plant Res 118:83–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tallmon DA, Koyuk A, Luikart G, Beaumont MA (2008) COMPUTER PROGRAMS: onesamp: a program to estimate effective population size using approximate Bayesian computation. Mol Ecol Res 8:299–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tsumura Y (2006) The phylogeographic structure of Japanese coniferous species as revealed by genetic markers. Taxon 55:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Uemura K (1986) A note on Tertiary Sciadopitys (Coniferopsida) from Japan. Bull Nat Sci Mus Tokyo Ser C 12:53–60Google Scholar
  67. Väli Ü, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H (2008) To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? Mol Ecol 17:3808–3817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. van der Hammen T, Wijmstra TA, Zagwijn WH (1971) The floral record of the late cenozoic of Europe. In: Turekian KK (ed) Late cenozoic glacial ages. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  69. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vilas A, Pérez-Figueroa A, Caballero A (2012) A simulation study on the performance of differentiation-based methods to detect selected loci using linked neutral markers. J Evol Biol 25:1364–1376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Waples RS (2002) Definition and estimation of effective population size in the conservation of endangered species. In: Beissenger SR, McCullough DR (eds) Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 147–168Google Scholar
  72. Waples RS, Do C (2008) LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Res 8:753–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Waples RS, Do C (2010) Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol Appl 3:244–262CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Wolfe AP, Tappert R, Muehlenbachs K, Boudreau M, McKellar RC, Basinger JF, Garrett A (2009) A new proposal concerning the botanical origin of Baltic amber. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 276:3403–3412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Worth JRP, Sakaguchi S, Tanaka N, Yamasaki M, Isagi Y (2013) Northern richness and southern poverty: contrasting genetic footprints of glacial refugia in the relictual tree Sciadopitys verticillata (Coniferales: Sciadopityaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 108:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yamada M (1993) Compilation of literature on archaeological wooden remains in Japan: history of human-plant relationship from the point of timber economy and species selection. Jpn J Hist Bot, Special Issue 1 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  77. Yamamoto S-I (1988) Seedling recruitment of Chamaecyparis obtusa and Sciadopitys verticillata in different microenvironments in an old-growth Sciadopitys verticillata forest. J Plant Res 101:61–71Google Scholar
  78. Young AG, Boshier D (2000) Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. Csiro Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  79. Yumoto T (2011) Historical perspectives on the relationships between humanity and nature in Japan. Landscape ecology in Asian cultures. Springer, New York, pp 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. P. Worth
    • 1
  • Masashi Yokogawa
    • 2
  • Andrés Pérez-Figueroa
    • 3
  • Yoshihiko Tsumura
    • 4
  • Nobuhiro Tomaru
    • 5
  • Jasmine K. Janes
    • 6
  • Yuji Isagi
    • 7
  1. 1.School of Plant ScienceUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Laboratory of BotanyOsaka Museum of Natural HistoryOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of VigoPontevedraSpain
  4. 4.Department of Forest GeneticsForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  5. 5.Graduate School of Bioagricultural SciencesNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  6. 6.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  7. 7.Laboratory of Forest Biology, Division of Forest and Biomaterials Science, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations