Skip to main content

Population genetics of Formica aquilonia wood ants in Scotland: the effects of long-term forest fragmentation and recent reforestation

Conservation Genetics volume 15, pages 853–868 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Formica aquilonia wood ants are forest specialists which play a key role in the ecology of forests in Europe. Many of the Scottish populations at the edge of the species distribution range occur in highly fragmented landscapes. We used ten microsatellite loci to study the genetic diversity and structure of populations from two contrasting regions (Inverpolly and the Trossachs) to set the Scottish populations in the context of conspecific populations in mainland Europe. Historically, both study regions have experienced extreme habitat loss and fragmentation over several centuries. Inverpolly has remained fragmented whereas large scale reforestation over the last century has greatly increased the forested area in the Trossachs. Despite the long history of fragmentation, genetic diversity in the Scottish populations was greater than in the populations in mainland Europe. Genetic diversity was similar in the two Scottish regions and no evidence of inbreeding was detected. However, the populations in Inverpolly showed more evidence of genetic bottlenecks, possibly due to more frequent stochastic events such as moorland fires. The ant populations in individual forests were genetically distinct and we detected no contemporary gene flow between forests. The most intensively studied forest where non-native conifer plantations now occupy the matrix between the remaining ancient woodland fragments showed evidence that admixture and gene flow between nests was reducing the past differentiation. This may reflect a dynamic response to the reconnection of previously isolated populations in forest fragments by recent reforestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Anon (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Ashmole P (2011) Grass roots contributions to woodland restoration in the Scottish uplands. In: Marrs SJ, Foster S, Hendrie C, Mackey EC, Thompson DBA (eds) The changing nature of Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage, The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, pp 355–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RE, Bourke AFG (2001) The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecol Lett 4:650–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuisat M (1996) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Formica lugubris B and their variability in other ant species. Mol Ecol 5:599–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4):574–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortelius W (2005) Mating behaviour in the polygynous/polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ann Zool Fenn 42:213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovart M, Thibault J-C, Igual J-M, Bauzà-Ribot M, Rabouam C, Bretagnolle V (2013) Population structure and dispersal patterns within and between Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of a large-range pelagic seabird. PLoS One 8:e70711

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist AS, Meats AW (2010) The genetic structure of populationsof an invading pest fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, at the species climatic range. Heredity 105:165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaubitz JC (2004) CONVERT: a user friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol Ecol Notes 4:309–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. J Hered 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2005) HIERFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenstrand N, Seppa P (2003) Conservation genetics of the wood ant, Formica lugubris, in a fragmented landscape. Mol Ecol 12:2931–2940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenstrand N, Gertsch PJ, Pamilo P (2002) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the ant Formica exsecta. Mol Ecol Notes 2:67–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol Ecol 14:599–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer B, Chapuisat M, Kremer N, Finet C, Keller L (2006) Unicoloniality, recognition and genetic differentiation in a native Formica ant. J Evol Biol 19:2031–2039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer B, Keller L, Chapuisat M (2009) Genetic clusters and sex biased geneflow in a unicolonial Formica ant. BMC Evol Biol 9:69–80

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2006) A review of wood ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in Scotland. Scottish natural heritage commissioned report No 178 (ROAME No F04AC319), pp 1–29

  • Hughes J, Broome A (2007) Forests and wood ants in Scotland. Forestry commission information note 90. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

  • Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY:a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:551–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biodivers 16:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald M (2013) Highland ants: distribution, ecology and conservation. E-book. Highland Biological Recording Group, Inverness, p 64. http://www.hbrg.org.uk/Atlases.html

  • Mäki-Petäys H, Breen J (2007) Genetic vulnerability of a remnant ant population. Conserv Genet 8:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäki-Petäys H, Zakharov A, Viljakainen L, Corander J, Pamilo P (2005) Genetic changes associated to declining populations of Formica ants in fragmented forest landscape. Mol Ecol 14:733–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh B (2011) The extent, nature and distribution of Scotland’s woodlands. In: Marrs SJ, Foster S, Hendrie C, Mackey EC, Thompson DBA (eds) The changing nature of Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage, The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, pp 327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamitsu T, Yamagishi H (2009) Nest density, genetic structure, and triploid workers in exotic Bombus terrestris populations colonized Japan. Apidologie 40:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1997) Population biology of social insect conservation. Mem Mus Vic 56:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Zhu D, Fortelius W, Rosengren R, Seppa P, Sundström L (2005) Genetic patchwork of network-building wood ant populations. Ann Zool Fenn 42:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Punttila P (1996) Succession, forest fragmentation and the distribution of wood ants. Oikos 75:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R, Pamilo P (1983) The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-building Formica ants. Acta Entomol Fenn 42:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R, Sundström L, Fortelius W (1993) Monogyny and polygyny of Formica ants—a result of alternative dispersal tactics? In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 308–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘ 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seppä P, Sundsröm L, Punttila P (1995) Facultative polygony and habitat succession in boreal ants. Biol J Linn Soc 4:533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2005) Deforestation reduces nest mound size and decreases the production of sexual offspring in the wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ann Zool Fenn 42:259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2007a) The role of food and colony size in sexual offspring production in a social insect: an experiment. Ecol Entomol 32:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2007b) Wood ants are wood ants: deforestation causes population declines in the polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ecol Entomol 32:707–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorvari J, Theodora P, Turillazzi S, Hakkarainen H, Sundstrom L (2008) Food resources, chemical signalling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia. Behav Ecol 19:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP (2010) Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol Ecol 19:3496–3514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström L, Seppä P, Pamilo P (2005) Genetic population structure and dispersal patterns in Formica ants—a review. Ann Zool Fenn 42:163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: aphididae). Mol Biol Evol 13:510–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res 89:135–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2009) A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes. Mol Ecol 18:2148–2164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2011) COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol Ecol Resour 11:141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jonathan Hughes at Scottish Wildlife Trust for early discussions and advice on site selection and Alice Broome at Forest Research for advice on wood ant ecology. We thank David Anderson for assisting us to locate nests in the Trossachs. We are also indebted to the two anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments and advice. The study was financed by the Forestry Commission.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tytti Vanhala

    Present address: Vanhalytix, Kasbytomten 412, 74193, Knivsta, Sweden

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Research, Alice Holt, Farnham, Surrey, England, GU10 4LH, UK

    Kevin Watts

  2. Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9SY, UK

    Tytti Vanhala, Stuart A’Hara & Joan Cottrell

Authors
  1. Tytti Vanhala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stuart A’Hara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joan Cottrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Cottrell.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 509 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 1,393 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanhala, T., Watts, K., A’Hara, S. et al. Population genetics of Formica aquilonia wood ants in Scotland: the effects of long-term forest fragmentation and recent reforestation. Conserv Genet 15, 853–868 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-014-0584-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-014-0584-1

Keywords

  • Fragmentation
  • Reforestation
  • Gene flow
  • Genetic diversity
  • Relatedness