Conservation Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 743–747 | Cite as

Molecular evidence for historic long-distance translocations of brown bears in the Balkan region

  • Carsten NowakEmail author
  • Csaba Domokos
  • Aleksandar Dutsov
  • Christiane Frosch
Short Communication


We tested the hypothesis that brown bears were translocated from the Romanian Carpathians to Bulgaria via air transportation during the communist regime in the 1970s and 1980s. Microsatellite analysis was performed on 199 bear samples from Bulgaria and Romania. Assignment and admixture tests revealed the existence of seven genotypes (=2.8 %) in Bulgaria that were assigned with high probabilities to the Romanian population, supporting the translocation and successful establishment of Carpathian bears in Bulgaria. While we cannot rule out the possibility that active long-distance dispersal contributed to the observed pattern, the spatial distribution and sex ratio of the detected Romanian genotypes strongly favor the translocation hypothesis.


Ursus arctos Large carnivores Balkan Assignment test Bear conservation 



The Romanian samples were kindly provided by Árpád Sárkány, the “Târnava Mare” Hunting and Angling Association, Romsilva—Romanian National Forest Administration, Károly Pál, Károly Illyés, Szilárd Bordi-Zima, and Miklós Bálint. Valuable assistance was recieved from Márton Atilla Kelemen. Samples were collected within the frame of Milvus Group’s Brown bear conservation and research program, which is financially supported from EuroNatur (Germany), Alertis, fund for bear and nature conservation (Netherlands), International Association for Bear Research and Management, Nando Peretti Foundation, and the Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS). Sampling in Bulgaria was assisted by Kostadin Valchev, Diana Zlatanova, Elena Tsingarska-Sedefcheva, Lubomir Petrov, Genadi Gavrilov, Yanko Yankov, Venislava Racheva (Balkani Wildlife Society), Georgi Georgiev, Dimitar Pamporo (Regional Environment Inspectorate Smolian Team), Ruslan Serbezov (Ministry of Environment and Water), Rosen Andreev (Chepino Hunting Enterprize) and several more. Wolfgang Fremuth and Michael Brombacher (FZS) provided administrative assistance. Sequencing service was provided by the Biodiversity and Climate Research Institute Frankfurt. CF received funding from the Johanna Samel-Stiftung. Additional funding comes from LIFE EX-TRA project LIFE/NAT/IT/000502 funded by the European Union and from Hesse’s LOEWE excellence initiative.


  1. Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2004) Improved noninvasive genotyping method: application to brown bear (Ursus arctos) faeces. Mol Ecol Notes 4:519–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bidon T, Frosch C, Eiken HG, Kutschera VE, Hagen SB, Aarnes SG, Fain SR, Janke A, Hailer F (2013) A sensitive and specific multiplex PCR approach for sex identification of ursine and tremarctine bears suitable for non-invasive samples. Mol Ecol Resour 13:362–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv 96:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frosch C, Dutsov A, Georgiev G, Nowak C (2011) Case report of a fatal bear attack documented by forensic wildlife genetics. Forensic Sci Int-Genet 5:342–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaczensky P, Chapron G, von Arx M, Huber D, Andrén H and Linnell (Eds) (2012) Status, management and distribution of large carnivores – bear, lynx, wolf and wolverine—in Europe. A large carnivore initiative for Europe report prepared for the European Commission (contract 070307/2012/629085/SER/B3)Google Scholar
  8. Kaphegyi TAM, Dees M, Zlatanova D, Ueffing C, Dutsov A, Kaphegyi U (2013) Rapid assessment of linear transport infrastructure in relation to the impact on landscape continuity for large ranging mammals. Biodivers Conserv 22:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kitahara E, Isagi Y, Ishibashi Y, Saitoh T (2000) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the Asiatic black bear Ursus thibetanus. Mol Ecol 9:1661–1662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paetkau D, Strobeck C (1994) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Mol Ecol 3:489–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paetkau D, Shields GF, Strobeck C (1998) Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Mol Ecol 7:1283–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol 13:55–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paunovic M, Cirovic D (2006) Viability increase and recovery of brown bear Ursus arctos L. 1758 population in northeastern Serbia. Faculty of Biology, University of BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  15. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pritchard JK, Stephensa M, Donnellya P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stoen OG, Zedrosser A, Saebo S, Swenson JE (2006) Inversely density-dependent natal dispersal in brown bears Ursus arctos. Oecologia 148:356–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taberlet P, Camarra JJ, Griffin S, Uhres E, Hanotte O, Waits LP, DuboisPaganon C, Burke T, Bouvet J (1997) Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population. Mol Ecol 6:869–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang J (2011) COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol Ecol Resour 11:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Nowak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Csaba Domokos
    • 2
  • Aleksandar Dutsov
    • 3
  • Christiane Frosch
    • 1
  1. 1.Conservation Genetics GroupSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum FrankfurtGelnhausenGermany
  2. 2.Milvus Group - Bird and Nature Protection AssociationTârgu MureşRomania
  3. 3.Balkani Wildlife SocietySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations