Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How closely do measures of mitochondrial DNA control region diversity reflect recent trajectories of population decline in birds?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring levels of genetic diversity in wildlife species is important for understanding population status and trajectory. Knowledge of the distribution and level of genetic diversity in a population is essential to inform conservation management, and help alleviate detrimental genetic impacts associated with recent population bottlenecking. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers such as the control region have become a common means of surveying for within-population genetic diversity and detecting signatures of recent population decline. Nevertheless, little attention has been given to examining the mtDNA control region’s sensitivity and performance at detecting instances of population decline. We review genetic studies of bird populations published since 1993 that have used the mtDNA control region and reported haplotype diversity, number of haplotypes and nucleotide diversity as measures of within-population variability. We examined the extent to which these measures reflect differences in known demographic parameters such as current population size, severity of any recent bottleneck and IUCN Red List status. Overall, significant relationships were observed between two measures of genetic diversity (haplotype diversity and the number of haplotypes), and population size across a number of comparisons. Both measures gave a more accurate reflection of recent population history in comparison to nucleotide diversity, for which no significant associations were found. Importantly, levels of diversity only correlated with demographic declines where population sizes were known to have fallen below 500 individuals. This finding suggests that measures of mtDNA control region diversity should be used with a degree of caution when inferring demographic history, particularly bottleneck events at population sizes above N = 500.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Allendorf FW (1986) Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol 5:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11:697–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker AJ, Marshall H (1997) Mitochondrial control region sequences as tools for understanding evolution. In: Mindell D (ed) Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Pica Press, New York, pp 51–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N (2006) Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birdlife International (2011) Birdlife data zone. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/home. Accessed 2 Nov 2011

  • Crnokrak P, Roff D (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78:311–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giradoux P (2013) Package ‘pgirmess’ (Internet). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess/pgirmess.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2013

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Heber S, Briskie J (2010) Population bottlenecks and increased hatching failure in endangered birds. Conserv Biol 24:1674–1678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J (2009) Evolutionary conservation genetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Hughes MA (2007) Coding sequence polymorphism in avian mitochondrial genomes reflects population histories. Mol Ecol 16:1369–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2011) The IUCN Red List of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 1 Dec 2011

  • Kimura M (1969) The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics 61:893–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CJ, Kitchen A, Miyamoto MM (2006) Comment on “Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals”. Science 314:1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabholz B, Mauffrey JF, Bazin E, Galtier N, Glemin S (2008) Determination of mitochondrial genetic diversity in mammals. Genetics 178:351–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabholz B, Glemin S, Galtier N (2009) The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA across birds and mammals. BMC Evolut Biol 9:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn T (1997) Molecular evolution of the mitochondrial genome. In: Mindell D (ed) Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Pica Press, New York, pp 3–328

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruokonen M (2002) Structure and evolution of the avian mitochondrial control region. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23(3):422–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17:688–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair E, Pérez-Losada M (2005) Molecular phylogenetics for conservation biology. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Pim Edelaar along with a second anonymous reviewer for their comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim J. Groombridge.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 70 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 1296 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, H., Morgan, B.J.T. & Groombridge, J.J. How closely do measures of mitochondrial DNA control region diversity reflect recent trajectories of population decline in birds?. Conserv Genet 14, 1291–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0514-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0514-7

Keywords