Abstract
Monitoring levels of genetic diversity in wildlife species is important for understanding population status and trajectory. Knowledge of the distribution and level of genetic diversity in a population is essential to inform conservation management, and help alleviate detrimental genetic impacts associated with recent population bottlenecking. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers such as the control region have become a common means of surveying for within-population genetic diversity and detecting signatures of recent population decline. Nevertheless, little attention has been given to examining the mtDNA control region’s sensitivity and performance at detecting instances of population decline. We review genetic studies of bird populations published since 1993 that have used the mtDNA control region and reported haplotype diversity, number of haplotypes and nucleotide diversity as measures of within-population variability. We examined the extent to which these measures reflect differences in known demographic parameters such as current population size, severity of any recent bottleneck and IUCN Red List status. Overall, significant relationships were observed between two measures of genetic diversity (haplotype diversity and the number of haplotypes), and population size across a number of comparisons. Both measures gave a more accurate reflection of recent population history in comparison to nucleotide diversity, for which no significant associations were found. Importantly, levels of diversity only correlated with demographic declines where population sizes were known to have fallen below 500 individuals. This finding suggests that measures of mtDNA control region diversity should be used with a degree of caution when inferring demographic history, particularly bottleneck events at population sizes above N = 500.




References
Allendorf FW (1986) Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol 5:181–190
Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11:697–709
Baker AJ, Marshall H (1997) Mitochondrial control region sequences as tools for understanding evolution. In: Mindell D (ed) Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Pica Press, New York, pp 51–82
Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N (2006) Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570–572
Birdlife International (2011) Birdlife data zone. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/home. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
Crnokrak P, Roff D (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270
Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508
Frankham R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78:311–327
Giradoux P (2013) Package ‘pgirmess’ (Internet). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess/pgirmess.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2013
Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Heber S, Briskie J (2010) Population bottlenecks and increased hatching failure in endangered birds. Conserv Biol 24:1674–1678
Höglund J (2009) Evolutionary conservation genetics. Oxford University Press, New York
Hughes AL, Hughes MA (2007) Coding sequence polymorphism in avian mitochondrial genomes reflects population histories. Mol Ecol 16:1369–1376
IUCN (2011) The IUCN Red List of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 1 Dec 2011
Kimura M (1969) The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics 61:893–903
Mulligan CJ, Kitchen A, Miyamoto MM (2006) Comment on “Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals”. Science 314:1390
Nabholz B, Mauffrey JF, Bazin E, Galtier N, Glemin S (2008) Determination of mitochondrial genetic diversity in mammals. Genetics 178:351–361
Nabholz B, Glemin S, Galtier N (2009) The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA across birds and mammals. BMC Evolut Biol 9:54
Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York
Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269
Quinn T (1997) Molecular evolution of the mitochondrial genome. In: Mindell D (ed) Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Pica Press, New York, pp 3–328
Ruokonen M (2002) Structure and evolution of the avian mitochondrial control region. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23(3):422–432
Ruxton GD (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17:688–690
Sinclair E, Pérez-Losada M (2005) Molecular phylogenetics for conservation biology. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Pim Edelaar along with a second anonymous reviewer for their comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, H., Morgan, B.J.T. & Groombridge, J.J. How closely do measures of mitochondrial DNA control region diversity reflect recent trajectories of population decline in birds?. Conserv Genet 14, 1291–1296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0514-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0514-7