Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of small irrigation diversion dams on the recent migration rates of steelhead and redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barriers to migration are numerous in stream environments and can occur from anthropogenic activities (such as dams and culverts) or natural processes (such as log jams or dams constructed by beaver (Castor canadensis)). Identification of barriers can be difficult when obstructions are temporary or incomplete providing passage periodically. We examine the effect of several small irrigation diversion dams on the recent migration rates of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in three tributaries to the Methow River, Washington. The three basins had different recent migration patterns: Beaver Creek did not have any recent migration between sites, Libby Creek had two-way migration between sites and Gold Creek had downstream migration between sites. Sites with migration were significantly different from sites without migration in distance, number of obstructions, obstruction height to depth ratio and maximum stream gradient. When comparing the sites without migration in Beaver Creek to the sites with migration in Libby and Gold creeks, the number of obstructions was the only significant variable. Multinomial logistic regression identified obstruction height to depth ratio and maximum stream gradient as the best fitting model to predict the level of migration among sites. Small irrigation diversion dams were limiting population interactions in Beaver Creek and collectively blocking steelhead migration into the stream. Variables related to stream resistance (gradient, obstruction number and obstruction height to depth ratio) were better predictors of recent migration rates than distance, and can provide important insight into migration and population demographic processes in lotic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Prtrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araki H, Ardren WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007a) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv Biol 21:181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Araki H, Waples RS, Ardren WR, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007b) Effective population size of steelhead trout: influence of variance in reproductive success, hatchery programs, and genetic compensation between life history forms. Mol Ecol 16:953–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES et al (2005) Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornn TC, Reiser DW (1991) Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Am Fish Soc Special Publ 19:83–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: an information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christie MR, Marine ML, Blouin MS (2011) Who are the missing parents? Grandparentage analysis identifies multiple sources of gene flow into a wild population. Mol Ecol 20:1263–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costello AB, Down TE, Pollard SM, Pacas CJ, Taylor EB (2003) The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 57:328–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (eds) (2006) Connectivity and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epifanio JM, Hooe M, Buck DH, Philipp DP (1999) Reproductive success and assortative mating among Pomoxis species and their hybrids. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faubet P, Gaggiotti OE (2008) A new Bayesian method to identify the environmental factors that influence recent migration. Genetics 178:1491–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faubet P, Waples R, Gaggiotti OE (2007) Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Mol Ecol 16:1149–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Rieman BE, Dunham JB, Young MK, Peterson DP (2009) Invasion versus isolation: trade-offs in managing native salmonids with barriers to upstream movement. Conserv Biol 23:859–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) (1996) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath DD, Busch C, Kelly J, Atagi DY (2002) Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol 11:197–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Stearns SC (eds) (2004) Evolution illuminated Salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes 6:576–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen M, Terry A, Tucker G, Jones A (2007) Guidance on the maintenance of landscape connectivity features of major importance for wild flora and fauna. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens KD, Connolly PJ (2010) Effectiveness of a redesigned water diversion using rock vortex weirs to enhance longitudinal connectivity for small salmonids. North Am J Fish Manag 30:1544–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure MM, Holmes EE, Sanderson BL, Jordan CE (2003) A large-scale multispecies status assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol Appl 13:964–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DR (ed) (1996) Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, p 429

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuig MH, Guy CS, Kalinowski ST, Fredenberg WA (2010) Landscape influences on genetic differentiation among bull trout populations in a stream-lake network. Mol Ecol 19:3620–3633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LM, Close T, Kapuscinski AR (2004) Lower fitness of hatchery and hybrid rainbow trout compared to naturalized populations in Lake Superior tributaries. Mol Ecol 13:3379–3388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Williams JE (1990) Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Conserv Biol 4:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narum SR, Contor C, Talbot A, Powell MS (2004) Genetic divergence of sympatric resident and anadromous forms of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Walla Walla River, USA. J Fish Biol 65:471–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narum SR, Zendt JS, Graves DG, Sharp WR (2008) Influence of landscape on resident and anadromous life history types of Oncorhynchus mykiss. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:1013–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HM, Dunham JB, Peacock MM (2006a) Landscape attributes and life history variability shape genetic structure of trout populations in a stream network. Landsc Ecol 21:901–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HM, Isaak DJ, Dunham JB, Thurow RF, Rieman BE (2006b) Fine-scale natal homing and localized movement as shaped by sex and spawning habitat in Chinook salmon: insights from spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual genotypes. Mol Ecol 15:4589–4602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JL, Byrne A, Graziano SL, Kozfkay CC (2009) Steelhead genetic diversity at multiple spatial scales in a managed basin: Snake River, Idaho. North Am J Fish Manag 29:680–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novinger DC, Rahel FJ (2003) Isolation management with artificial barriers as a conservation strategy for cutthroat trout in headwater streams. Conserv Biol 17:772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JB, Wilson SL, Kretschmer EJ, Jones KC, Seeb JE (2000) Characterization of 14 tetranucleotide microsatellite loci derived from sockeye salmon. Mol Ecol 9:2185–2187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9197–9201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexroad CE, Coleman RL, Gustafson AL, Hershberger WK, Killefer J (2002) Development of rainbow trout microsatellite markers from repeat enriched libraries. Mar Biotechnol 4:12–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Braun DP, Mendelson MA, Master LL (1997) Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 11:1081–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheer MB, Steel EA (2006) Lost watersheds: barriers, aquatic habitat connectivity, and salmon persistence in the Willamette and Lower Columbia River Basins. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1654–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smouse PE, Peakall R (1999) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spear S, Balkenhol N, Fortin M, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson JJ et al (2009) A centralized model for creating shared, standardized, microsatellite data that simplifies inter-laboratory collaboration. Conserv Genet 10:1145–1149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swindell WR, Bouzat JL (2005) Modeling the adaptive potential of isolated populations: experimental simulations using Drosophila. Evolution 59:2159–2169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thrower FP, Hard JJ, Joyce JE (2004) Genetic architecture of growth and early life-history transitions in anadromous and derived freshwater populations of steelhead. J Fish Biol 65(Suppl A):286–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurow RF, Lee DC, Rieman BE (1997) Distribution and status of seven native salmonids in the interior Columbia River Basin and portions of the Klamath River and Great Basins. North Am J Fish Manag 17:1094–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel DE (2013) Colonization of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after barrier removal in a tributary to the Methow River, WA. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow

  • Weigel DE, Sorensen PW (2001) The influence of habitat characteristics on the longitudinal distribution of brook, brown and rainbow trout in a small Midwestern stream. J Freshw Ecol 16:599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel DE, Connolly PJ, Martens KD, Powell MS (2013) Colonization of steelhead in a natal stream after barrier removal. Trans Am Fish Soc 142:920–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Heredity 28:114–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding and materials were provided by the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation. We are grateful to the local landowners, G. Ott and V. Stokes, who allowed access to sites on Beaver Creek. M. Newsom provided valuable scientific direction to the project. G. Knott and M. Notaro provided support with local coordination and permitting. K. Martens, B. Fisher, W. Tibbits and N. Glasser assisted in data collection and operation of the weir and tag readers. J. Faler conducted the genetic analysis. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana E. Weigel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weigel, D.E., Connolly, P.J. & Powell, M.S. The impact of small irrigation diversion dams on the recent migration rates of steelhead and redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Conserv Genet 14, 1255–1267 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0513-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-013-0513-8

Keywords

Navigation