Conservation Genetics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 511–528 | Cite as

Species-specific traits predict genetic structure but not genetic diversity of three fragmented Afrotropical forest butterfly species

Research Article


The Upper Guinean forests of Ghana, West Africa, are considered among the most threatened and fragmented in the world. Little is known about the genetic consequences of fragmentation on Ghana’s forest-associated species, but this genetic signature is generally expected to differ across species. We compared patterns of mtDNA cytochrome oxidase I (COI) variation of three Nymphalid forest butterfly species that differ with respect to their relative dispersibilities (Aterica galene: high habitat fidelity, low dispersal ability; Euphaedra medon: high habitat fidelity, strong dispersal ability; Gnophodes betsimena: relaxed habitat fidelity, low dispersal ability). Individuals were collected from two large forest reserves and five small sacred forest groves. Patterns of differentiation across species were broadly coincident with our predicted hierarchy of relative species dispersibility and suggested that genetic connectivity is most compromised by strict fidelity to forest habitat rather than by raw capacity for sustained flight. Connectivity was uncorrelated with geographic distance, but instead seemed best explained by urbanization and the sequential pattern of forest loss. Genetic diversity was dramatically different among species and not easily explained by either species-specific traits or effects of fragmentation. Aterica galene, the species most impacted by fragmentation, exhibited very high diversity, whereas G. betsimena, a broadly distributed, very common species, with relaxed habitat fidelity, was genetically depauperate. There was limited evidence of genetic erosion from the sacred groves despite these small forest patches accounting for less than 1–10 % of the total area of the forest reserves, which indicates these forest relics have high conservation value.


Sacred groves Habitat fragmentation Lepidoptera Ghana Nymphalidae mtDNA 


  1. Asubonteng KO (2007) Identification of land use/cover transfer hotspots in the Ejisu-Juabeng district, Ghana. Thesis, Kwam-Nkumrah University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC (1994) Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedick S, White AT, Searle JB, Hamer KC, Mustaffa N, Khen CV, Mohammed M, Schilthuizen M, Hill JK (2007) Impacts of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity in a tropical forest butterfly on Borneo. J Trop Ecol 23:623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15188–15193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwat SA, Rutte C (2006) Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Frontiers Ecol Environ 4:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickel TO, Carsten BA, Jurgen GR, Holldobler B, Linsenmair KE (2006) Influence of habitat fragmentation on the genetic variability in leaf litter ant populations in tropical rainforests of Sabah, Borneo. Biodivers Conserv 15:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blay D, Dwomoh FK, Damnyag L (2009) Assessment of forest degradation by local communities: the case study of Ghana. Food and Agriculture Organization of UN, Forest Resources Assessment Program, working paper 160Google Scholar
  8. Bossart JL, Carlton C (2002) Insect conservation in America: status and perspectives. Am Entomol 48:82–92Google Scholar
  9. Burney CW, Brumfield RT (2009) Ecology predicts levels of genetic differentiation in Neotropical birds. Am Nat 174:358–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byers JA (1997) Great circle distances: EARTH.EXE. Accessed March 2010
  11. Callens T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E, Durand EY, Githiru M, Huyghe JR, Lens L (2011) Genetic signature of population fragmentation varies with mobility in seven bird species of a fragmented Kenyan cloud forest. Mol Ecol 20:1829–1844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caterino MS, Chatzimanolis S (2009) Conservation genetics of three flightless beetle species in southern California. Conserv Genet 10:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowling SA, Cox PM, Jones CD, Maslin MA, Peros M, Spall SA (2008) Simulated glacial and interglacial vegetation across Africa: implications for species phylogenies and trans-African migration of plants and animals. Global Change Biol 14:828–840Google Scholar
  16. Crandall KA, Templeton AR (1993) Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction. Genetics 134:959–969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Debinski D (2006) Forest fragmentation and matrix affects: the matrix does matter. J. Biogeography 33:1791–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeFries R, Hansen A, Adrian NC, Hansen MC (2005) Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecol Appl 15:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dei JSG (1988) Crisis and adaptation in a Ghanaian forest community. Anthropol Q 61:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. deMenocal PB (2004) African climate change and faunal evolution during the Pliocene–Pleistocene. Earth Planet Sci Lett 220:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dupont LM, Jahns S, Marret F, Ning S (2000) Vegetation change in equatorial West Africa: time-slices for the last 150 ka. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 155:95–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elbers JP, Bossart JL (2009) Occurences of forest butterflies in the farmbush savannah outside a forest reserve in Ghana, West Africa. Int J Trop Insect Sci 29:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) ARLEQUIN ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  24. Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12:346–353Google Scholar
  25. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FAO (2009) Landcover of Ghana: Globcover regional. Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN. Accessed September 2009
  27. FAO (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010, Main Report, Forestry Paper 163. Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. Fetzner JW (1999) Extracting high-quality DNA from shed reptile skins: a simplified method. Biotechiques 26:1052–1054Google Scholar
  29. Finn DS, Blouin MS, Lytle DA (2007) Population genetic structure reveals terrestrial affinities for a headwater stream insect. Freshw Biol 52:1881–1897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Folmer O, Black M, Heoh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet 29:305–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fu Y-X (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Galtier N, Nabholz B, Glémin S, Hurst GDD (2009) Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol Ecol 18:4541–4550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gomez-Uchida D, Knight TW, Ruzzante DE (2009) Interaction of landscape and life history attributes on genetic diversity, neutral divergence and gene flow in a pristine community of salmonids. Mol Ecol 18:4854–4869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guillot G, Mortier F, Estoup A (2005) Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:712–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Habel JC, Meyer M, Schimtt T (2009) The genetic consequence of differing ecological demands of a generalist and a specialist butterfly species. Biodivers Conserv 18:1895–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  39. Harrison RG (1989) Animal mitochondrial DNA as a genetic marker in population and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 4:6–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hawthorne WD, Abu-Juam M (1995) Forest protection in Ghana. IUCN/ODA. IUCN Publications, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Anderson BJ, Hakes AS, Jackson HB, Jackson SE, Cronin J (2007) Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distribution. Oecologia 151:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc B 270:313–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hokit DG, Ascunce M, Ernst J, Branch LC, Clark AM (2010) Ecological metrics predict connectivity better than geographic distance. Conserv Genet 11:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoy MA (2003) Insect molecular genetics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Hurst GDD, Jiggins FM (2005) Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proc R Soc B 272:1525–1534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. IUCN (2012) Why is biodiversity in crisis? World Conservation Union, Accessed May 20, 2012
  47. Jenkins DG, Carey M, Czerniewska J, Fletcher J, Hether T, Jones A, Knight S, Knox J, Long T et al. (2010) A meta-analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics?. Ecography 33: 315–320Google Scholar
  48. Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelly ST (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-6-13 6:13.v.13.09PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Karl SA, Toonen RJ, Grant WS, Bowen BW (2012) Common misconceptions in molecular ecology: echoes of the modern sysnthesis. Mol Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05576.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Keyghobadi N (2007) The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool 85:1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuefler D, Hudgens B, Haddad NM, Morris WF, Thurgate N (2010) The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. Ecology 91:944–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Larsen TB (2005) Butterflies of West Africa. Apollo Books, StenstrupGoogle Scholar
  53. Larsen TB (2006) The Ghana butterfly fauna and its contribution to the objectives of the protected areas system. WDSP report no. 63. Wildlife division (Forestry Commission) & IUCN (World Conservation Union)Google Scholar
  54. Lebbie AR, Freudenberger MS (1996) Sacred groves in Africa: forest patches in transition. In: Schelhas J, Greenberg R (eds) Forest patches in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 300–326Google Scholar
  55. Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2010) Natural, not urban, barriers define population structure for a coastal endemic butterfly. Conserv Genet 11:2311–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lord JM, Norton DA (1990) Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Conserv Biol 4:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Louy D, Habel JC, Schmitt T, Assmann T, Meyer M, Muller P (2007) Strongly diverging population genetic patterns of three skipper species: the role of habitat fragmentation and dispersal ability. Conserv Genet 8:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Resit Akçakaya H, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart S (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22:1424–1442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Maley J (1996) African rain forest: main characteristics of changes in vegetation and climate from the upper Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Proc R. Soc Edinb B 104:31–73Google Scholar
  61. Mayaux P, Bartholome E, Fritz S, Belward A (2004) A new landcover map of Africa for the year 2000. J Biogeography 31:861–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM (1987) Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematic. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:269–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Gustavo ABF, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Ntiamoa-Baidu T (2001) Indigenous versus introduced biodiversity conservation strategies: the case of protected area systems in Ghana. In: Weber W, White LJT, Vedder A, Naughton-Treves L (eds) African rain forest ecology and conservation. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  66. Odoom FK (2005) Chainsawing in the natural forests of Ghana: an assessment of the socio economic impacts of this practice. Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN, forest harvesting case-studyGoogle Scholar
  67. Osafo YB (2005) Reducing emissions from tropical forest deforestation: applying compensated reduction in Ghana. In: Moutinho P, Shwartzman S (eds) Tropical deforestation and climate change. Amazon institute for Environmental Research, pp. 63–72Google Scholar
  68. Poorter L, Bongers F, Louamé FN’, Hawthorne WD (2004) Biodiversity of West African forests: an ecological atlas of woody plant species. CABI Publishers, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2010) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19:1205–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J (2002) Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol 19:2092–2100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rutte C (2011) The sacred commons: conflicts and solutions of resource management in sacred natural sites. Biol Conserv 144:2387–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sacccheri IJ, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA (1996) Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50:2000–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sato M, Kohmatsu Y, Yuma M, Tsubaki Y (2008) Population genetic differentiation in three sympatric damselfly species in a highly fragmented urban landscape (Zygoptera:Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 37:131–144Google Scholar
  77. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 72:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2001) Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82:1879–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Souter R, Ntiamoa-Baidu Y, Smith J, Rana D (2003) Recognizing the contribution of sacred natural sites for biodiversity conservation. WWF-ARC SNS paper. Workshop stream II, Session 1. V World Parks CongressGoogle Scholar
  81. Steele CA, Baumsteiger J, Storfer A (2009) Influence of life-history variation on the genetic structure of two sympatric salamander taxa. Mol Ecol 18:1629–1639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swift TL, Hannon SJ (2010) Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biol Rev 85:35–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Trizio I, Crestanello B, Galbusera P, Wauters LA, Tosi G, Matthysen E, Hauffe HC (2005) Geographical distance and physical barriers shape the genetic structure of Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in the Italian Alps. Mol Ecol 14:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. UNESCO (2003) The importance of sacred natural sites for biodiversity conservation. In: Lee K, Schaaf T (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop, UNESCO (Division of Ecological Sciences), ParisGoogle Scholar
  87. Vandergast AG, Bohonak AJ, Weissman DB, Fisher RN (2007) Understanding the genetic effects of recent habitat fragmentation in the context of evolutionary history: phylogeography and landscape genetics of a southern California endemic Jerusalem cricket (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae: Stenopelmatus). Mol Ecol 16:977–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Brakefield PM, Saccheri IJ (2004) Phylogeography of Aglais urticae (Lepidoptera) based on DNA sequences of the mitochondrial COI gene and control region. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:630–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wahlberg N, Saccheri I (2007) The effects of Pleistocene glaciations on the phylogeography of Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Eur J Entomol 104:675–684Google Scholar
  90. Whittnett A, Zimmermann M, Willmott KR, Herrera N, Mallarino R, Simpson F, Joron M, Lamas G, Mallettt J (2005) Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly “suture zone”. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2525–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138Google Scholar
  92. Zink RM, Barrowclough GF (2008) Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol Ecol 17:2107–2121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSoutheastern Louisiana UniversityHammondUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations