Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic diversity in a reintroduced swift fox population

Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Swift fox (Vulpes velox) were historically distributed in southwestern South Dakota including the region surrounding Badlands National Park (BNP). The species declined during the mid-1800s, largely due to habitat loss and poisoning targeted at wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Only a small population of swift foxes near Ardmore, which is located in Fall River County, South Dakota, persisted. In 2003, a reintroduction program was initiated at BNP with swift foxes translocated from Colorado and Wyoming. Foxes released in the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 were translocated from Colorado (BNP-Colorado) whereas in 2006, released foxes were translocated from Wyoming (BNP-Wyoming). Our objective was to evaluate genetic diversity and structure of the restored swift fox population in the area surrounding BNP compared to source fox populations in an area of Colorado and Wyoming, as well as the local swift fox population neighboring BNP near Ardmore in Fall River County, South Dakota. A total of 400 swift foxes (28 released in 2003, 28 released in 2004, 26 released in 2005, 26 released in 2006, 252 wild-born foxes, 40 individual foxes from the Ardmore area of South Dakota) was genotyped using twelve microsatellite loci. We report mean gene diversity values of 0.778 (SD = 0.156) for the BNP-Colorado population, 0.753 (SD = 0.165) for the BNP-Wyoming population, 0.751 (SD = 0.171) for the BNP population, and 0.730 (SD = 0.166) for the Fall River population. We also obtained Fst values ranging from 0.014 to 0.029 for pair-wise comparisons of fox populations (BNP, Fall River, BNP-Wyoming, BNP-Colorado). We conclude that the reintroduced fox population around BNP has high genetic diversity comparable to its source populations in Colorado and Wyoming. Although genetic diversity indicates that the reintroduction was successful, additional time is necessary to fully evaluate long-term genetic maintenance and interconnectivity among these populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allardyce D, Sovada MA (2003) Review of the ecology, distribution, and status of swift foxes in the United States. In: Sovada MA, Carbyn L (eds) The swift fox: ecology and conservation of swift foxes in a changing world. Canadian Plains Research Center, Regina, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2008) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Ryman N (2002) The role of genetics in population viability analysis. In: Beissinger SR, McCullough DR (eds) population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 50–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausband DE, Foresman KR (2007) Dispersal, survival, and reproduction of wild-born, yearling swift foxes in a reintroduced population. Can J Zool 85:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowcock AM, Ruizlinares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbyn L (1998) COSEWIC status report on the swift fox. Committee on the status of endangered wildlife in Canada. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbyn LN, Armbruster H, Mamo C (1994) The swift fox reintroduction program in Canada from 1983–1992. In: Bowels M, Whelan CJ (eds) Symposium proceedings on restoration of endangered plants and animals, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge

  • Cullingham CI, Smeeton C, White BN (2007) Isolation and characterization of swift fox tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 7(1):160–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cullingham CI, Curteanu M, Ball MC, Manseau M (2010) Feasability and recommendations for swift fox fecal DNA profiling. J Wildl Manag 74(4):849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoscue HJ (1979) Vulpes velox. Mamm species 122:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren H (1992) Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) analysis of micro- satellites-a new approach to studies of genetic relationships in birds. Auk 109:886–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock JT, Detling JK (2002) Bison-prairie dog-plant interactions in North American mixed-grass prairie. Oecologia 132:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Merriam G (1985) Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley DJ, White GC, Fitzgerald JP (2005) Estimation of swift fox population size and occupancy rates in Eastern Colorado. J Wildl Manag 69(3):861–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes SH, Boyd DK (1996) Genetic variation of naturally colonizing wolves in the Central Rocky Mountains. Conserv Biol 10(4):1028–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco LV, Langston AA, Mellersh CS, Neal CL, Östrander EA (1996) A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 7:359–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fredholm M, Wintero AK (1995) Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to the Canidae family. Mamm Genome 6:11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garner A, Rachlow JL, Hicks JF (2005) Patterns of genetic diversity and its loss in mammalian population. Conserv Biol 19:1215–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995) FSTAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F statistics, J Hered 86: 485–486

  • Harrison RL, Barr DJ, Dragoo JW (2002) A comparison of population survey techniques for swift foxes (Vulpes velox) in New Mexico. Am Midl Nat 148:320–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalvels J (1982) Soil survey of Fall River County, South Dakota. Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service in cooperation with the South Dakota Agricultural Experimental Station

  • Kilgore DL (1969) An ecological study of the swift fox (Vulpes velox) in the Oklahoma panhandle. Am Midl Nat 81:512–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen AM, Gese EM, Waits LP, Karki SJ, Schauster ER (2005) Genetic and spatial structure within a swift fox population. J Anim Ecol 74:1173–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen AM, Gese EM, Waits LP, Karki SM, Schauster ER (2006) Multiple breeding strategies in the swift fox, Vulpes velox. Anim Behav 71:1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koons DN (2010) Genetic estimation of dispersal in metapopulation viability analysis. Anim Conserv 13:127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin PA, Moore JJ, Chakraborty R, Jin L, Goodall J, Woodruff DS (1994) Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science 265:1193–1201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1975) Molecular population genetics and evolution. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1987) Corridors in real landscape: a reply to Simberloff and Cox. Conserv Biol 1:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson TL, Lindzey FG (2002) Swif fox survival and production in southeastern Wyoming. J Mammal 83(1):199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Östrander EA, Sprague GF, Rine J (1993) Identification and characterization of dinucleotide repeat (CA)n markers for genetic mapping in dog. Genomics 19:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouborg NJ, Angeloni F, Vergeer P (2009) An essay on the necessity and feasibility of conservation genomics. Conserv Genet 11:643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Strobeck C (1994) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Mol Ecol 3:489–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Pilgrim KL, White PJ, Paxinos EE, Schwartz MK, Fleischer RC (2001) Kinship, social relationships, and den sharing in kit foxes. J Mammal 82:858–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell TA (2006) Habitat selection by swift fox in Badlands National Park and surrounding area in South Dakota. Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings

  • Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F (1985) Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlotterer C, Amos B, Tautz D (1991) Conservation of polymorphic simple sequence loci in cetacean species. Nature 354:63–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder GM (2007) Effects of coyotes and release site selection on survival and movement of Translocated swift foxes in the Badlands ecosystem of South Dakota. Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings

  • Schwartz MK, Ralls K, Williams DF, Cypher BL, Pilgrim KL, Fleischer RC (2005) Gene flow among San Joaquin kit fox populations in a severely changed ecosystem. Conserv Genet 6:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segelbacher G, Hoglund J, Storch I (2003) From connectivity to isolation: genetic consequences to population fragmentation in capercaillie across Europe. Mol Ecol 12:1773–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikes RS, Gannon WL (2011) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal 92:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovada MA, Roy CC, Bright JB, Gillis JR (1998) Causes and rates of mortality of swift foxes in western Kansas. J Wildl Manag 62:1300–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift Fox Conservation Team Annual Report (2000) In: Schmitt GC (ed) New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Taylor AC, Sherwin WB, Wayne RK (1994) Genetic variation of microsatellite loci in a bottlenecked species: the northern hairy-nosed wombat Lasiorbinus krefftii. Mol Ecol 3:277–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uresk DW, Severson KE, Javersak J (2003) Detecting swift fox: smoked-plate scent stations vs spotlighting. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research paper RMRS-RP-39

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant SG, Uresk DW (1989) Burning upland, mixed prairie in Badlands National Park. Prairie Nat 21:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1990) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CL, Blejwas K, Johnston JJ, Jaeger MM (2003) Temporal genetic variation in a coyote (Canis latrans) population experiencing high turnover. J Mammal 84:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman AL, Irby L, Giddings B (2003) The status and ecology of swift foxes in north central Montana. In: Sovada MA, Carbyn L (eds) The swift fox: ecology and conservation of swift foxes in a changing world. Canadian Plains Research Center, Regina, pp 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbaugh DM, Choate JR (1985) Historical biogeography of foxes in Kansas. Trans Kans Acad Sci 88:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our study was funded by the National Park Service. We appreciate the support provided by the Department of Natural Resource Management (formerly the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences) at South Dakota State University and the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks for providing administrative support for the project. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Special thanks to T. W. Grovenburg for assistance with figure creation. Also thanks to D. Schwalm for her help with PCR and K. Gedye for her help with the sequencer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Box 2140B, NPB Room 138, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    Indrani Sasmal, Jonathan A. Jenks & Shubham Datta

  2. Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA

    Lisette P. Waits

  3. Animal and Range Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57006, USA

    Michael G. Gonda

  4. Wind Cave National Park, 26611 U.S. Highway 385, Hot Springs, SD, 57747, USA

    Greg M. Schroeder

Authors
  1. Indrani Sasmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan A. Jenks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisette P. Waits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael G. Gonda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Greg M. Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shubham Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrani Sasmal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasmal, I., Jenks, J.A., Waits, L.P. et al. Genetic diversity in a reintroduced swift fox population. Conserv Genet 14, 93–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0429-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0429-8

Keywords

search

Navigation