Conservation Genetics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 543–555 | Cite as

Predicted range shifts in North American boreal forest birds and the effect of climate change on genetic diversity in blackpoll warblers (Setophaga striata)

Research Article

Abstract

As North American species’ ranges shift northward in response to climate change, populations isolated in high-elevation habitat “islands” at the southern edge of distributions are predicted to decrease in size or be extirpated. Levels of genetic structure and gene flow and the number of private alleles held within these peripheral populations can be used as a measure of the potential loss of genetic diversity due to climate change. We use GIS-based climate niche models to project geographic distributions of 15 boreal forest bird species for the year 2080 under two carbon emissions scenarios to predict the extent to which ranges will shift, leading to the extirpation of isolated populations at the southern periphery of the boreal forest. Breeding distributions of nearly all boreal bird species are predicted to expand as they shift northward, but will dramatically decrease or be completely lost from mountain populations in New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire by 2080. To examine the effect of these shifts on gene pools of migratory bird species we genotyped 178 blackpoll warblers (Setophaga striata) at nine microsatellite loci, sampling four imperiled high-elevation populations and four northern populations. In S. striata 10.4 % of microsatellite alleles were confined to populations expected to be lost due to climate change. However, these accounted for a nonsignificant percent of the genetic structure, and loss of these alleles would not significantly erode species heterozygosity or allelic richness. Our results indicate that isolated southern populations of S. striata, and possibly other migratory species with high gene flow, do not represent genetically isolated, independently evolving units. Efforts to mitigate the effect of climate change on boreal forest birds should focus on species in which peripheral populations harbor significant genetic diversity.

Keywords

Species distribution models Climate change Setophaga striata Conservation genetics Microsatellites Boreal forest birds 

References

  1. Able KP, Noon BR (1976) Avian community structure along elevational gradients in the northeastern United States. Oecologia 26:275–294Google Scholar
  2. Anderle RF, Carroll JR (1988) The first atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC (1989) A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends Ecol Evol 4:279–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avise JC (2004) Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker AC, Starger CJ, McClanahan TR, Glynn PW (2004) Coral reefs: corals’ adaptive response to climate change. Nature 430:741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banks SC, Ling SD, Johnson CR, Piggott MP, Williamson JE, Beheregaray LB (2010) Genetic structure of a recent climate change-driven range extension. Mol Eco 19:2011–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barret RDH, Schluter D (2007) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton NH, Slatkin M (1986) A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beale CM, Lennon JL, Gimona A (2008) Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birds. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:14908–14912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Pitman AJ (2008) Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecol Lett 11:1135–1146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beckage B, Osborne B, Gavin DG, Pucko C, Siccama T, Perkins T (2008) A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:4197–4202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beerling DJ, Huntley B, Bailey JP (1995) Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J Veg Sci 6:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bellinger MR, Johnson JA, Toepfer J, Dunn P (2003) Loss of genetic variation in Greater Prairie Chickens following a population bottleneck in Wisconsin, U.S. Conserv Biol 17:717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brelsford A, Milá B, Irwin DE (2012) Hybrid origin of Audubon’s warbler. Mol Ecol 20:2380–2389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carignan V, Villard MA (2002) Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review. Environ Monit Assess 78:45–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawson RHG, Gibbs HL, Hobson KA, Yezerinac SM (1997) Isolation of microsatellite DNA markers from a passerine bird, Dendroica petechia (the yellow warbler), and their use in population studies. Heredity 79:506–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dial RJ, Berg EE, Timm K, McMahon A (2007) Changes in the alpine forest-tundra ecotone commensurate with recent warming in southcentral Alaska: evidence from orthophotos and field plots. J Geophys Res 112:G04015. doi:10.1029/2007JG000453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eaton EH (1914) Birds of New York. University of the State of New York, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  20. Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modeling range-shifting species. Meth Ecol Evol 1:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinforma Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  22. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frankham R, Ralls K (1998) Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature 392:441–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frankham R, Callou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galbreath KE, Hafner DJ, Zamudio KR (2009) When cold is better: climate driven elevation shifts yield complex patterns of diversification and demography in an alpine specialist (American pika, Ochotona princeps). Evolution 63:2848–2863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior C, Banks H, Gregory JM, Johns TC, Mitchell JFB, Wood RA (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim Dyn 16:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  28. Grant PR, Grant BR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296:707–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green DM (2005) Designatable units for the status assessment of endangered species. Conserv Biol 19:1813–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Habel JC, Augenstein B, Meyer M, Neve G, Rodder D, Assmann T (2010) Population genetics and ecological niche modelling reveal high fragmentation and potential future extinction of the endangered relict butterfly (Lycaena helle). In: Habel JC, Assmann T (eds) Relict species: phylogeography and conservation biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hewitt GM (2004) Genetic consequences of climate oscillations in the quaternary. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser B 359:183–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hijmans RJ, Graham CH (2006) The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob Chang Biol 12:2272–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Internat J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huntley B, Collingham YC, Green RE, Hilton GM, Rahbek C, Willis SG (2006) Potential impacts of climate change upon geographical distributions of birds. Ibis 148:8–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huntley B, Collingham YC, Willis SG, Green RE (2008) Potential impacts of climate change on European breeding birds. PLoS ONE 3:e1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) IPCC Special Report: Emissions Scenarios, IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, IPCC. http://www.ipcc.ch
  40. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, IPCC. http://www.ipcc.ch
  41. Jay F, Manel S, Alvarez N, Durand EY, Thuiller W, Holderegger R, Taberlet P, François O (2012) Forecasting changes in population genetic structure of alpine plants in response to global warming. Mol Ecol 21:2354–2368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kerchner C, Honzák M, Kemkes R, Richardson A, Townsend J, Rimmer CC (2009) Designing spatially explicit incentive programs for habitat conservation: a case study of the Bicknell’s Thrush wintering grounds. Ecol Econ 69:2108–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. King TL, Eackles MS, Henderson AP, Bocetti CI, Currie D, Wunderle JM (2005) Microsatellite DNA markers for delineating population structure and kinship among endangered Kirtland’s Warbler (Dendroica kirtlandii). Mol Ecol Notes 5:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. King DI, Lambert JD, Buonaccorsi JP, Prout LS (2008) Avian population trends in the vulnerable montane forests of the Northern Appalachians, USA. Biodivers Conserv 17:2691–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knowles LL (2009) Statistical Phylogeography. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:593–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kozak KH, Graham CH, Wiens JJ (2008) Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:141–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. La Sorte FA, Jetz W (2010) Projected range contractions of montane biodiversity under global warming. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 277:3401–3410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lacy RC (1997) Importance of genetic variation to viability of mammal populations. J Mammal 78:320–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Landres PB, Verner J, Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv Biol 2:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larson S, Jameson R, Etnier M, Flemings M, Bentzen P (2002) Loss of genetic diversity in sea otters (Enhydra lutris) associated with the fur trade of the 18th and 19th centuries. Mol Ecol 11:1899–1903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Larsson JK, Jansman HAH, Segelbacher G, Höglung J, Koelewijn HP (2008) Genetic impoverishment of the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) population in Netherlands: detectable only with a reference from the past. Mol Ecol 17:1897–1904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leonard JA, Vila C, Wayne RK (2005) Legacy lost: genetic variability and population size of extirpated US grey wolves (Canis lupus). Mol Ecol 14:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (1999) GDA: software for the analysis of discrete genetic data. http://alleyn.eeb.uconn.edu/gda/
  55. Loarie SR, Carter BE, Hayhoe K, McMahon S, Moe R, Knight CA, Ackerly DD (2008) Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3:e2502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McAlpine S (1993) Genetic heterozygosity and the reproductive success in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Heredity 70:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGowan KJ, Corwin K (2008) The second atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  58. Milá B, Smith TB, Wayne RK (2007) Speciation and rapid phenotypic differentiation in the yellow-rumped warbler Dendroica coronata complex. Mol Ecol 16:159–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitrovski P, Hoffmann AA, Heinze DA, Weeks AR (2008) Rapid loss of genetic variation in an endangered possum. Biol Lett 4:134–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionary Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moritz C, Patton JL, Conroy CJ, Parra JL, White GC, Beissinger SR (2008) Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322:261–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muster C, Maddison WP, Uhlmann S, Berendonk TU, Vogler AP (2009) Arctic-alpine distribution—Metapopulations on a continental scale? Am Nat 173:313–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669Google Scholar
  64. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet 2:e190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paxinos EE, James HF, Olson SL, Ballou JD, Leonard JA, Fleischer RC (2002) Prehistoric decline of genetic diversity in the nene. Science 296:1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pearson RG, Dawson TE (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Martinez-Meyer E, Brotons L, McClean C, Miles L, Segurado P, Dawson TP, Lees CD (2006) Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J Biogeogr 33:1704–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pease KM, Freedman AH, Pollinger JP et al (2009) Landscape genetics of a California mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus): the roles of ecological and historical factors in generating differentiation. Mol Ecol 18:1848–1862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peterson AT (2001) Predicting species geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 103:559–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Poole A (ed) (2005) The Birds of North America Online. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca
  72. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genet 155:945–959Google Scholar
  73. Ralston J, Kirchman JJ (2012) Continent-scale genetic structure in a boreal forest migrant, the blackpoll warbler (Setophaga striata). The Auk 129: 467–478Google Scholar
  74. Raupach MR, Marland G, Ciais P, Le Quere C, Canadell JG, Klepper G, Field CB (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104:10288–10293Google Scholar
  75. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  76. Rich TD, Beardmore CJ, Berlanga H et al (2004) Partners in flight North American land bird conservation plan. Cornell, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  77. Richards CL, Carstens BC, Knowles LL (2007) Distribution modeling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographic hypotheses. J Biogeogr 34:1833–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rodenhouse NL, Matthews SN, McFarland KP et al (2008) Potential effects of climate change on birds of the Northeast. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:517–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rodenhouse NL, Christenson LM, Parry D, Green LE (2009) Climate change effects on native fauna of northeastern forests. Can J For Res 39:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ross AM, Johnson G (2011) Recovery plan for New York state populations of spruce grouse (Falcipennis canadensis). New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol 1:9–10Google Scholar
  82. Saccheri I, Kuusaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saurez F, Binkley D, Kaye MW (1999) Expansion of forest stands into tundra in the Noatak National Preserve, northwest Alaska. Ecoscience 6:465–470Google Scholar
  84. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Slatkin M (1985) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and geographic structure of natural populations. Nature 236:787–792Google Scholar
  87. Stenzler LM, Fraser R, Lovette IJ (2004) Isolation and characterization of 12 microsatellite loci from golden-winger warblers (Vermivora chrysoptera) with broad cross-taxon utility in emberizine songbirds. Mol Ecol Notes 4:602–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Studds CE, McFarland KP, Aubry Y, Rimmer CC, Hobson KA, Marra PP, Wassenaar LI (2012) Stable-hydrogen isotope measures of natal dispersal reflect observed population declines in a threatened migratory songbird. Divers Distrib. doi:10.111/j.1472-4642.2012.00931.x Google Scholar
  89. Taylor SS, Jamieson IG, Wallis GP (2007) Historic and contemporary levels of genetic variation in two New Zealand passerines with different histories of decline. J Evol Biol 20:2035–2047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 10:2020–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? J Biogeogr 31:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tingley MW, Monahan WB, Beissinger SR, Moritz C (2009) Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:19637–19643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tolley KA, Makokha JS, Houniet DT, Swart BL, Matthee CA (2009) The potential for predicted climate shifts to impact genetic landscapes of lizards in the South African Cape Floristic region. Mol Phylogenet Evol 51:120–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. United States Forest Service (2006) White Mountain National Forest: Monitoring and Evaluation Report 2006. http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/white_mountain/publications/
  95. van Els P, Cicero C, Klicka J (2012) High latitudes and high genetic diversity: phylogeography of a widespread boreal bird, the gray jay (Perisoreus canadensis). Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:456–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK, Leikola N, Luoto M (2008) Projected large-scale range reductions of northern-boreal land bird species due to climate change. Biol Conserv 141:1343–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waite TA, Strickland D (2006) Climate change and the demographic demise of a hoarding bird living on the edge. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 273:2809–2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Waples RS (1991) Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of “species” under the endangered species act. Mar Fish Rev 53:11–22Google Scholar
  99. Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA et al (1998) Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an island population. Science 282:1695–1698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zuckerburg B, Woods AM, Porter W (2009) Poleward shifts in breeding bird distributions in New York State. Glob Chang Biol 15:1866–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.New York State MuseumAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Utica CollegeUticaUSA

Personalised recommendations