Conservation Genetics

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1259–1268 | Cite as

Dispersal promotes high gene flow among Canada lynx populations across mainland North America

  • J. R. RowEmail author
  • C. Gomez
  • E. L. Koen
  • J. Bowman
  • D. L. Murray
  • P. J. Wilson
Research Article


The amount and extent of dispersal can have a large effect on the evolutionary trajectory, dynamics and structure of populations. Thus, understanding patterns of genetic structure provide information about the needs and approaches for population management and species conservation. To date studies addressing the population structure of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) have been surprisingly equivocal, despite a large amount of research quantifying population cyclicity and synchrony and the species’ species at-risk status in the contiguous United States and eastern provinces of Canada. Here we use 17 microsatellite loci to conduct a large-scale genetic structuring assessment for Canada lynx, including most of its geographic range from Alaska to Newfoundland. We found large differentiation between lynx populations on the island of Newfoundland and those on the mainland. Yet, contrary to previous studies we found little genetic differentiation (FST, Dest, RST) owing to the Rocky Mountains, but some evidence of a subtle gene flow restriction between Ontario and Manitoba as previously proposed to be the result of a climatic barrier. Bayesian clustering analysis, however, only suggested two genetic clusters, one consisting of lynx from Newfoundland, and the other consisting of lynx from the rest of the North American range. Because Canada lynx are harvested for fur across most of their range, our results are informative for effective management strategies (e.g., defining management units) aimed at ensuring long-term population connectivity and species persistence.


Bayesian clustering Conservation Discriminant analysis of principal components Microsatellite Newfoundland 



We thank C. Parsons, J. Paul, S. Simpkins, and K. Smith for lab work, North American Fur Auction and Fur Harvesters Auction Inc for facilitating sample collection, volunteers for help collecting samples, and D. Berezanski, H. Golden, and T. Jung for identifying harvest locations. Funding was provided by NSERC (strategic grant to DLM, JB and PJW, and a scholarship to ELK).


  1. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezzani R (2009) Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 32:818–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball MC, Finnegan L, Manseau M, Wilson P (2010) Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada. Conserv Genet 11:2131–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonte D, Baert L, Lens L, Maelfait JP (2004) Effects of aerial dispersal, habitat specialisation, and landscape structure on spider distribution across fragmented grey dunes. Ecography 27:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman J, Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L (2002) Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology 83:2049–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooker L, Brooker M (2002) Dispersal and population dynamics of the blue-breasted fairy-wren, Malurus pulcherrimus, in fragmented habitat in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Wildlife Res 29:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broquet T, Petit EJ (2009) Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 40:193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron AW (1958) Mammals of the islands in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Superintendent of Publications, Queen’s printer, Ottawa, p 165Google Scholar
  8. Campbell V, Strobeck C (2006) Fine-scale genetic structure and dispersal in Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) within Alberta, Canada. Can J Zoolog 84:1112–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmichael L, Clark W, Strobeck C (2000) Development and characterization of microsatellite loci from lynx (Lynx canadensis), and their use in other felids. Mol Ecol 9:2197–2199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmichael L, Krizan J, Nagy J, Fuglei E, Dumond M, Johnson D, Veitch A, Berteaux D, Strobeck C (2007) Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids. Mol Ecol 16:3466–3483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr D, Bowman J, Wilson PJ (2007) Density-dependent dispersal suggests a genetic measure of habitat suitability. Oikos 116:629–635Google Scholar
  12. Chen C, Durand E, Forbes F, François O (2007) Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study. Mol Ecol Notes 7:747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costello AB, Down TE, Pollard SM, Pacas CJ, Taylor EB (2003) The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 57:328–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawford NG (2010) Smogd: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 10:556–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Croteau EK (2009) Population genetics and phylogeography of bobcats (Lynx rufus) using microsatellites and mitochondral DNA. Dissertation, Southern Illinois UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Cushman SA, Mckelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. The Am Nat 168:486–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodds DG (1960) The economics, biology and management of the snowshoe hare in Newfoundland. Dissertation, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Elton C, Nicholson M (1942) The ten-year cycle in numbers of the lynx in Canada. The J Anim Ecol 11:215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. François O, Durand E (2010) Spatially explicit Bayesian clustering models in population genetics. Mol Ecol Resour 10:773–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geffen E, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004) Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Mol Ecol 13:2481–2490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbs JP (1998) Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in southern New England. J Wildl Manag 62:584–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19Google Scholar
  24. Goudet J, Raymond M, De-Meeus T, Rousset F (1996) Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933–1940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Fréville H, Heuertz M (2003) Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 163:1467–1482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoving CL, Harrison DJ, Krohn WB, Joseph RA, O’Brien M (2005) Broad-scale predictors of Canada lynx occurrence in eastern North America. J Wildl Manag 69:739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kyle C, Strobeck C (2001) Genetic structure of North American wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations. Mol Ecol 10:337–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manel S, Bellemain E, Swenson J, Francois O (2004) Assumed and inferred spatial structure of populations: the Scandinavian brown bears revisited. Mol Ecol 13:1327–1331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menotti-Raymond M, David VA, Lyons LA, Schäffer AA, Tomlin JF, Hutton MK, O’Brien SJ (1999) A genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the domestic cat (Felis catus). Genomics 57:9–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moran PAP (1953) The statistical analysis of the Canadian Lynx cycle. Aust J Zool 1:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mowat G, Slough B (2003) Habitat preference of Canada lynx through a cycle in snowshoe hare abundance. Can J Zoolog 81:1736–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray DL, Boutin S, O’Donoghue M (1994) Winter habitat selection by lynx and coyotes in relation to snowshoe hare abundance. Can J Zoolog 72:1444–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murray DL, Steury TD, Roth JD (2008) Assessment of Canada lynx research and conservation needs in the southern range: another kick at the cat. J Wildl Manag 72:1463–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Musiani M, Leonard JA, Cluff H, Gates CC, Mariani S, Paquet PC, Vila C, Wayne RK (2007) Differentiation of tundra/taiga and boreal coniferous forest wolves: genetics, coat colour and association with migratory caribou. Mol Ecol 16:4149–4170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Connell LM, Mosseler A, Rajora OP (2007) Extensive long-distance pollen dispersal in a fragmented landscape maintains genetic diversity in white spruce. J Hered 98:640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palsbøll PJ, Bérubé M, Allendorf FW (2006) Identifcation of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evol 22:11–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poole KG (1997) Dispersal patterns of lynx in the Northwest Territories. J Wildl Manag 61:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  46. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  47. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM, York EC, Bromley C, Fuller TK, Wayne RK (2006) A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Mol Ecol 15:1733–1742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Row JR, Brooks RJ, Mackinnon CA, Lawson A, Crother BI, White M, Lougheed SC (2011) Approximate Bayesian computation reveals the factors that influence genetic diversity and population structure of fox snakes. J Evol Biol 11:2364–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rueness EK, Stenseth NC, O’Donoghue M, Boutin S, Ellegren H, Jakobsen KS (2003) Ecological and genetic spatial structuring in the Canadian lynx. Nature 425:69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt K, Ratkiewicz M, Konopinski MK (2011) The importance of genetic variability and population differentiation in the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx for conservation, in the context of habitat and climate change. Mamm Rev 41:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz MK, Mills LS, Mckelvey KS, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW (2002) DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature 415:520–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Slough BG, Mowat G (1996) Lynx population dynamics in an untrapped refugium. J Wildl Manag 60:946–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stenseth NC, Falck W, Chan KS, Bjørnstad ON, O’donoghue M, Tong H, Boonstra R, Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Yoccoz NG (1998) From patterns to processes: phase and density dependencies in the Canadian lynx cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stenseth NC, Chan KS, Tong H, Boonstra R, Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Post E, O’Donoghue M, Yoccoz NG, Forchhammer MC (1999) Common dynamic structure of Canada lynx populations within three climatic regions. Science 285:1071–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stenseth NC, Ehrich D, Rueness EK, Lingjærde OC, Chan KS, Boutin S, O’Donoghue M, Robinson DA, Viljugrein H, Jakobsen KS (2004a) The effect of climatic forcing on population synchrony and genetic structuring of the Canadian lynx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6056–6061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stenseth NC, Shabbar A, Chan KS, Boutin S, Rueness EK, Ehrich D, Hurrell JW, Lingjærde OC, Jakobsen KS (2004b) Snow conditions may create an invisible barrier for lynx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10632–10634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tammeleht E, Remm J, Korsten M, Davison J, Tumanov I, Saveljev A, Männil P, Kojola I, Saarma U (2010) Genetic structure in large, continuous mammal populations: the example of brown bears in northwestern Eurasia. Mol Ecol 19:5359–5370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Zyll De Jong CG (1975) Differentiation of the Canada lynx, Felis (Lynx) canadensis subsolana, in Newfoundland. Can J Zoolog 53:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright S (1948) On the roles of directed and random changes in gene frequency in the genetics of populations. Evolution 2:279–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Row
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Gomez
    • 1
  • E. L. Koen
    • 2
  • J. Bowman
    • 3
  • D. L. Murray
    • 1
  • P. J. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Environmental and Life SciencesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  3. 3.Wildlife Research and Development Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations