Conservation Genetics

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 1133–1143 | Cite as

Inbreeding, body condition, and heterozygosity-fitness correlations in isolated populations of the endangered eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus c. catenatus)

Research Article

Abstract

Endangered species often occur in small populations that may have a greater risk of short-term extinction due to the negative effects of inbreeding depression. The eastern massasauga (Sistrurus c. catenatus) is an endangered rattlesnake that is found in isolated populations of varying size throughout its range. Here, we investigate whether variation in an indirect measure of individual fitness (relative body condition) can be explained by genome-wide levels of genetic variation (based on 19 microsatellite loci) and other factors. To do this, we use genetic and phenotypic data from individual snakes sampled from 14 populations throughout the species’ range. We tested for levels of inbreeding by comparing observed mean multi-locus heterozygosity (MLH) for each population (an estimate of average inbreeding) with the expected distribution under random mating. We then looked for evidence of heterozygosity-fitness correlations (HFCs) using a measures of individual MLH and relative body condition. In all but one population, observed MLH values are indistinguishable from those generated under a model of random mating implying low levels of inbreeding in most populations. There was significant variation in both mean MLH and mean body condition within and among populations but evidence for inbreeding depression was equivocal: in support, there were some high (but largely non-significant) HFCs effect sizes within a number populations, including one that showed significant evidence for both inbreeding and a HFC. Overall, however, there was no significant correlation between MLH and body condition across all populations after controlling for non-genetic factors such as sex, season of capture and year of capture. Our results suggest that among-population and individual differences in fitness (measured as body condition) in these snakes are better explained by short-term ecological factors rather than genetic mechanisms, but leave open the possibility that limited undetected effects of inbreeding depression are present.

Keywords

Inbreeding Multilocus heterozygosity Relative body condition Heterozygosity-fitness correlations Microsatellite DNA loci Eastern massasauga rattlesnake Sistrurus c. catenatus 

References

  1. Allender MC, Mitchell MA, Phillips CA et al (2006) Hematology, plasma biochemistry, and antibodies to select viruses in wild-caught Eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus c. catenatus) from Illinois. J Wildl Dis 42:107–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allender MC, Mitchell MA, Dreslik MJ et al (2008) Measuring agreement and discord among hemagglutination inhibition assays against different ophidian paramyxovirus strains in the eastern massasauga (Sistrurus c. catenatus). J Zoo Wildl Med 39:358–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amos W, Wilmer JW, Fullard K et al (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 268:2021–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson CS, Gibbs HL, Chiucchi JE (2010) Nineteen polymorphic microsatellite loci isolated from the Eastern Massasauga Rattlesnake Sistrurus c. catenatus. Conserv Genet Resour 2010:243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balloux F (2004) Heterozygote excess in small populations and the heterozygote-excess effective population size. Evolution 58:1891–1900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bean K, Amos W, Pomeroy PP et al (2004) Patterns of parental relatedness and pup survival in the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Mol Ecol 13:2365–2370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertram N, Larsen KW (2004) Putting the squeeze on venomous snakes: accuracy and precision of length measurements taken with the “Squeeze Box”. Herpetol Rev 35:235–238Google Scholar
  8. Boakes EH, Wang J, Amos W (2007) An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations. Heredity 98:172–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronikowski AM, Arnold SJ (1999) The evolutionary ecology of life history variation in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans. Ecology 80:2314–2325Google Scholar
  10. Castric V, Bernatchez L, Belkhir K, Bonhomme F (2002) Heterozygote deficiencies in small lacustrine populations of brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis mitchill Pisces, Salmonidae): a test of alternative hypotheses. Heredity 89:27–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol Ecol 18:2746–2765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiucchi JE, Gibbs HL (2010) Similarity of contemporary and historical gene flow among highly fragmented populations of an endangered rattlesnake. Mol Ecol 19:5345–5358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coltman DW, Bowen WD, Wright JM (1998) Birth weight and neonatal survival of harbour seal pups are positively correlated with genetic variation measured by microsatellites. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 265:803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daltry JC, Bloxam Q, Cooper G et al (2001) Five years of conserving the “world’s rarest snake’, the Antiguan racer Alsophis antiguae. Oryx 35:119–127Google Scholar
  17. Davey JW, Blaxter ML (2011) RADSeq: next generation population genetics. Brief Funct Genomic 9:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. David P (1998) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeWoody YD, DeWoody JA (2005) On the estimation of genome-wide heterozygosity using molecular markers. J Hered 96:85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald M, Shine R, Lemckert F (2004) Life history attributes of the threatened Australian snake (Stephen’s banded snake, Hoplocephalus stephensii, Elapidae). Biol Conserv 119:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gage MJG, Surridge AK, Tomkins JL et al (2006) Reduced heterozygosity depresses sperm quality in wild rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Curr Biol 16:612–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glemin S (2003) How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57:2678–2687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Government of Canada (2010) Species at risk public registry (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Accessed 1 March 2012
  26. Gregory PT (2006) Influence of income and capital on reproduction in a viviparous snake: direct and indirect effects. J Zool 270:414–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grueber CE, Waters JM, Jamieson IG (2011) The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species. Mol Ecol 20:67–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gyllenstrand N, Seppa P (2003) Conservation genetics of the wood ant, Formica lugubris, in a fragmented landscape. Mol Ecol 12:2931–2940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Akesson M (2001) Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers. Proc Royal Soc Lond Biol Sci 268:1287–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison X, Bearhop S, Inger R et al (2011) Heterozygosity—fitness correlations in a migratory bird: an analysis of inbreeding and single-locus effects. Mol Ecol 20:4786–4795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M et al (2001) Computer tools for spatial analysis of 8 plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 127:15–19Google Scholar
  32. Jacobson ER (1993) Implications of infectious-diseases for captive propagation and introduction programs of threatened endangered reptiles. J Zoo Wildl Med 24:245–255Google Scholar
  33. Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW (1996) Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller LF, Arcese P, Smith JMN et al (1994) Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372:356–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Legendre P (2008) lmodel2: Model II Regression. R package version 1.6-3Google Scholar
  38. Lippe C, Dumont P, Bernatchez L (2006) High genetic diversity and no inbreeding in the endangered copper redhorse, Moxostoma hubbsi (Catostomidae, Pisces): the positive sides of a long generation time. Mol Ecol 15:1769–1780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lopez-Pujol J, Zhang FM, Ge S (2005) Population genetics and conservation of the critically endangered Clematis acerifolia (Ranunculaceae). Can J Bot 83:1248–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madsen T, Shine R (2002) Short and chubby or long and slim? Food intake, growth and body condition in free-ranging pythons. Aust Ecol 27:672–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madsen T, Shine R (2008) Silver spoons and snake body sizes: prey availability early in life influences long-term growth rates of free-ranging pythons. J Anim Ecol 69:952–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Madsen T, Stille B, Shine R (1996) Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders, Vipera berus. Biol Conserv 75:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naulleau G, Bonnet X (1996) Body condition threshold for breeding in a viviparous snake. Ecophysiology 107:301–306Google Scholar
  45. Oostermeijer JGB, Luijten SH, Den Nijs JCM (2003) Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation. Biol Conserv 113:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peig J, Green AJ (2010) The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24:1323–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reading CJ (2004) The influence of body condition and prey availability on female breeding success in the smooth snake (Coronella austriaca laurenti). J Zool 264:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reinert HK (1981) Reproduction by the Massasauga (Sistrurus c. catenatus). Am Midl Nat 105:393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J (2010) On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Mol Ecol 19:1439–1451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Marshall TC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2000) Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc Royal Soc Lond Biol Sci 267:1657–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG et al (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93:255–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sperry JH, Weatherhead PJ (2008) Prey-mediated effects of drought on condition and survival of a terrestrial snake. Ecology 89:2770–2776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64:1202–1217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Szymanski J (1998) Status assessment for Eastern Massasauga. U. S. Fish and wildlife service aeries status assessment for Eastern Massasauga. Ft. Snelling, MNGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor EN, Malawy MA, Browning DM, Lemar SV, DeNardo DF (2005) Effects of food supplementation on the physiological ecology of female western diamond-backed rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox). Oecologia 144:206–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ujvari B, Madsen T, Kotenko T et al (2002) Low genetic diversity threatens imminent extinction for the Hungarian meadow viper (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis). Biol Conserv 105:127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Upton D, Black R, Cedar K et al. (2003) National Massasauga Recovery Strategy. Canadian Eastern Massasauga Recovery Team. Available at http://www.brocku.ca/massasauga/ p 23. Accessed 1 March 2012
  60. Weatherhead PJ, Brown PJ (1996) Measurement versus estimation of condition in snakes. Can J Zool 74:1617–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weatherhead PJ, Knox JM, Harvey DS et al (2009) Diet of Sistrurus catenatus in Ontario and Ohio: effects of body size and habitat. J Herpetol 43:693–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wooten JA, Gibbs HL (2012) Niche divergence and lineage diversification among closely-related Sistrurus rattlesnakes. J Evol Biol 25:317–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Statistics for Biology and Health), 1st edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal BiologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Ohio Biodiversity Conservation PartnershipOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Center for Life Sciences EducationOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations