Skip to main content

Population genetic structure of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird, Dasyornis brachypterus; implications for conservation

Abstract

For species that are habitat specialists or sedentary, population fragmentation may lead to genetic divergence between populations and reduced genetic diversity within populations, with frequent inbreeding. Hundreds of kilometres separate three geographical regions in which small populations of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird, Dasyornis brachypterus, a small, ground-dwelling passerine that occurs in fire-prone bushland in eastern Australia, are currently found. Here, we use mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA markers to: (i) assess the sub-specific taxonomy designated to northern range-edge, and central and southern range-edge D. brachypterus, respectively, and (ii) assess levels of standing genetic variation and the degree of genetic subdivision of remnant populations. The phylogenetic relationship among mtDNA haplotypes and their spatial distribution did not support the recognised subspecies boundaries. Populations in different regions were highly genetically differentiated, but in addition, the two largest, neighboring populations (located within the central region and separated by ~50 km) were moderately differentiated, and thus are likely closed to migration (microsatellites, F ST = 0.06; mtDNA, F ST = 0.12, Θ ST = 0.08). Birds within these two populations were genotypically diverse and apparently randomly mating. A long-term plan for the conservation of D. brachypterus’s genetic diversity should consider individual populations as separate management units. Moreover, managers should avoid actively mixing birds from different populations or regions, to conserve the genetic integrity of local populations and avoid outbreeding depression, should further translocations be used as a recovery tool for this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Bain DW, Baker J, French KO, Whelan RJ (2008) Post-fire recovery of eastern Bristlebirds (Dasyornis brachypterus) is context-dependent. Wildl Res 35:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker J (1997) The decline, response to fire, status and management of the eastern Bristlebird. Pac Conserv Biol 3:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker J (1998) Ecotones and fire and the conservation of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird. PhD dissertation, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

  • Baker J (2000) The Eastern Bristlebird: cover-dependent and fire-sensitive. Emu 100:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker J (2001) Population density and home range estimates for the eastern Bristlebird at Jervis Bay, southeastern Australia. Corella 25:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker J (2003) Fire-sensitive birds and adaptive management. In: Bushfires: managing the risks. Proceedings of the 2002 NCC Bushfire Conference. Nature Conservation Council of NSW, Sydney, pp 59–65

  • Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2002) GENETIX 4.03, Logiciel Sous WindowsTM Pour la Genetique Des Populations., Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions: CNRS UMR:5000. Universite Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Birds Australia (2010) Birdata website. www.birdata.com.au/iba.vm. Accessed May 2010

  • Bitton PP, Dawson RD, Ochs CL (2008) Plumage characteristics, reproductive investment and assortative mating in tree swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1543–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodkin JL, Ballachey BE, Cronin MA, Scribner KT (1999) Population demographics and genetic diversity in remnant and translocated populations of sea otters. Conserv Biol 13:1378–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boessenkool S, Taylor SS, Tepolt CK, Komdeur J, Jamieson IG (2007) Large mainland populations of South Island robins retain greater genetic diversity than offshore island refuges. Conserv Genet 8:705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell MD (2008) The Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus in East Gippsland, Victoria, 1997–2002. Austral Field Ornithol 25:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LM, Ramey RR, Tamburini B, Gavin TA (2004) Population structure and mitochondrial DNA variation in sedentary Neotropical birds isolated by forest fragmentation. Conserv Genet 5:743–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castellon TD, Sieving KE (2006) An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conserv Biol 20:135–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1996) National strategy for the conservation of Australia’s biological diversity. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan SC, Armstrong J, Pickett M, Milne T, Baulderstone J, Hollfelder T, Bertozzi T (2009) Systematic and conservation implications of mitochondrial DNA diversity in emu-wrens, Stipiturus (Aves:Maluridae). Emu 109:143–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmands S (2007) Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 16:463–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren H (2004) Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genetics 5:435–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elphinstone MS (2008) The development and application of molecular methods for the analysis of habitat and population fragmentation in birds. PhD dissertation, Southern Cross University

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fossoy F, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (2009) Cell-mediated immunity and multi-locus heterozygosity in bluethroat nestlings. J Evol Biol 22:1954–1960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J, Martin G (2007) Under neutrality, Q ST ≤ F ST when there is dominance in an island model. Genetics 176:1371–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J, Raymond M, de Meeus T, Rousset F (1996) Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933–1940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale KA, Briskie JV (2007) Decreased immunocompetence in a severely bottlenecked population of an endemic New Zealand bird. Anim Conserv 10:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. In: Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, pp 95–98

  • Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Akesson M (2001) Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, pp 1287–1291

  • Hudson QJ, Wilkins RJ, Waas JR, Hogg ID (2000) Low genetic variability in small populations of New Zealand kokako Callaeas cinerea wilsoni. Biol Conserv 96:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson PK (2001) Restoration of genetic variation lost—the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 16:62–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2010) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. Available from URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org

  • Joseph L, Wilke T, Ten Have J, Chesser RT (2006) Implications of mitochondrial DNA polyphyly in two ecologically undifferentiated but morphologically distinct migratory birds, the masked and white-browed woodswallows Artamus spp. of inland Australia. J Avian Biol 37:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Arcese P, Smith JNM, Hochachka WM, Stearns SC (1994) Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372:356–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larson S, Jameson R, Bodkin J, Staedler M, Bentzen P (2002) Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J Mammal 83:893–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance SGW, Gomez MS (2005) Clearing width and movements of understory rainforest birds. Biotropica 37:149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16:605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance SGW, Stouffer PC, Laurance WE (2004) Effects of road clearings on movement patterns of understory rainforest birds in central Amazonia. Conserv Biol 18:1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leberg PL, Firmin BD (2008) Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol Ecol 17:334–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Edwards SV (2008) Divergence across Australia’s Carpentarian Barrier: Statistical Phylogeography of the Red-Backed Fairy Wren (Malurus melanocephalus). Evolution 62:3117–3134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill AM (2009) What factors influence rapid post-fire site re-occupancy? A case study of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird in eastern Australia. Int J Wildland Fire 18:84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall-Shackleton EA, Derryberry EP, Foufopoulos J, Dobson AP, Hahn TP (2005) Parasite-mediated heterozygote advantage in an outbred songbird population. Biol Lett 1:105–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining evolutionarily-significant-units for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in natural populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin C, Roberts DG (2010) Ten polymorphic microsatellite markers for the endangered Australian Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus. Conserv Genetic Resour 2:357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore AB, Owens PF (2006) Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 273:1049–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Ballou JD, Rideout BA, Frankham R (2000) Genetic management of chondrodystrophy in California condors. Anim Conserv 3:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP version 3.3: a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Reding DM, Freed LA, Cann RL, Fleischer RC (2010) Spatial and temporal patterns of genetic diversity in an endangered Hawaiian honeycreeper, the Hawaii Akepa (Loxops coccineus coccineus). Conserv Genet 11:225–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2001) How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55:1095–1103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DG, Ayre DJ, Whelan RJ (2007) Urban plants as genetic reservoirs or threats to the integrity of bushland plant populations. Conserv Biol 21:842–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez A, Andren H, Jansson G (2001) Habitat-mediated predation risk and decision making of small birds at forest edges. Oikos 95:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schodde R, Mason IJ (1999) The directory of Australian birds. Passerines. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GT (1977) The effects of environmental change on six rare birds. Emu 77:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Strong C, Lovejoy TE (2006) Long-term landscape change and bird abundance in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Conserv Biol 20:1212–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SS, Jamieson IG, Wallis GP (2007) Historic and contemporary levels of genetic variation in two New Zealand passerines with different histories of decline. J Evol Biol 20:2035–2047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR (1986) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity, diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uezu A, Metzger JP, Vielliard JME (2005) Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biol Conserv 123:507–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JEM, Whittaker RJ, Freudenberger D (2005) Bird community responses to habitat fragmentation: how consistent are they across landscapes? J Biogeogr 32:1353–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf CM, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple SA (1996) Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conserv Biol 10:1142–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations. The theory of gene frequencies, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T (1999) POPGENE version 1.31: Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the following people who provided D. brachypterus and D. broadbenti samples: D. Bain, University of Wollongong; R. Booth & David Fleay, Wildlife Park; M. Bramwell, Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment; M. Elphinstone, Southern Cross University; D. Oliver, Department of Environment and Climate Change; J. Sumner, Museum Victoria; R Palmer, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems. We thank M. Bramwell, D. Oliver, A. Chalklen, P. Latch & the Eastern Bristlebird Recovery Team for constructive discussions. We also thank M. Bramwell, D. Rohweder and D. Stewart for personal communications on recent population data and D. Bain and M. Elphinstone for technical assistance. This work was funded by the Australian Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment. This is contribution number 299 of the Ecological Genetics Group at the University of Wollongong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Roberts.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 169 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, D.G., Baker, J. & Perrin, C. Population genetic structure of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird, Dasyornis brachypterus; implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 12, 1075–1085 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-011-0210-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-011-0210-4

Keywords

  • Gene flow
  • Genetic diversity
  • Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA
  • Fire-sensitive
  • Habitat modification
  • Passerine
  • Threatened species