Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 433–439 | Cite as

Genetic identity of endangered massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus sp.) in Missouri

  • H. Lisle GibbsEmail author
  • Michael Murphy
  • James E. Chiucchi
Research Article

Abstract

An important application of DNA-based genetic techniques in conservation genetics is to establish the taxonomic identity of individuals whose ancestry is uncertain, especially those from declining populations. Massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus catenatus) in Missouri currently persist in three isolated populations and have been classified as eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (S. c. catenatus), which is a candidate for listing as a Federally Threatened or Endangered species. However, previous morphological evidence has suggested that these snakes are either hybrids between the eastern massasauga (S. c. catenatus) and the non-threatened western massasauga (S. c. tergeminus) or are pure S. c. tergeminus. Here, we analyze microsatellite DNA and mtDNA variation to assess the taxonomic identity of individuals from two of the three populations specifically those found in Holt and Linn Counties, Missouri. Population and phylogenetic analyses strongly support the conclusion that snakes in both populations are genetically most similar to reference S. c. tergeminus individuals from Kansas and are not related to S. c. catenatus individuals from Illinois and Ohio. These results argue that the current classification of these snakes as endangered S. c. catenatus is unwarranted and hence that the overall range-wide numbers of S. c. catenatus are less than previously estimated. Nonetheless the Missouri populations, while not part of the federally listed taxon, are strongly deserving of protected status at the state level because of their rarity within the state.

Keywords

Putative hybrids Genetic identity Massasauga rattlesnakes Cluster and phylogenetic analyses Microsatellites mtDNA 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Trish Crabill, Frank Durbian, and Rich Seigel for much appreciated assistance in obtaining samples from Missouri, and David Bender, Travis Taggart, Curtis Schmidt, and Joe Collins for their generous hospitality and help in obtaining samples in Kansas. Jose Diaz gave advice in the lab, Katy Greenwald, Mike Redmer, and Rich Seigel commented on the manuscript, and The Ohio State University College of Arts and Sciences and College of Biological Sciences provided financial support.

Supplementary material

10592_2010_151_MOESM1_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 52 kb)

References

  1. Anderson CS, Gibbs HL, Chiucchi J (2010) Nineteen polymorphic microsatellite loci isolated from the eastern massasauga rattlesnake, Sistrurus c. catenatus. Conserv Genet Resour. doi: 10.1007/s12686-010-9253-y
  2. Bowen BW, Avise JC (1996) Conservation genetics of marine turtles. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, p 397Google Scholar
  3. Burbrink FT, Lawson R, Slowinski JB (2000) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54:2107–2118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr, Barker DG, Price AH (1989) An apparent natural hybrid rattlesnake and Crotalus willardi (Viperidae) from the Peloncillo mountains of southwestern New Mexico. Herpetologica 45:344–349Google Scholar
  5. Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiucchi JE, Gibbs HL (2010) Similarity of contemporary and historical gene flow among highly-fragmented populations of an endangered rattlesnake. Mol Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04860.x
  7. Culver M, Johnson WE, Pecon-Slattery J, O’Brien SJ (2000) Genomic ancestry of the American puma (Puma concolor). J Hered 91:186–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daugherty CE, Cree A, Hay J, Thompson MB (1990) Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon). Nature 347:177–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emerson BC, Wallis GP (1994) Phylogenetic relationships of the Prodontria (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae; Subfamily Melolonthinae), derived from sequence variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol 4:433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans PD, Gloyd HK (1948) The subspecies of the massasuaga, Sistrurus catenatus, in Missouri. Bull Chicago Acad Sci 8:225–232Google Scholar
  12. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman M, DeSalle R (2008) Mitochondrial DNA extraction and sequencing of formalin-fixed archival snake tissue. Mitochondrial DNA 19:433–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbs HL, Diaz J (2010) Identification of single copy nuclear DNA markers for North American pit vipers. Mol Ecol Resour 10:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs HL, Sanz L, Calvete JJ (2009) Snake population venomics: Proteomics-based analyses of individual variation reveals gene regulation effects on venom protein expression in Sistrurus rattlesnakes. J Mol Evol 68:113–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haig S, Wadner RS, Forsman ED, Mullins TD (2001) Geographic variation and genetic structure of spotted owls. Conserv Genet 2:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart SN, Durbian FE, Dillman CB, Eckdahl TT (2008) Assessment of allelic variation among massasauga rattlesnake populations via microsatellite analysis. Trans Missouri Acad Sci 42:1–9Google Scholar
  18. Keogh SJ, Scott IAW, Fitzgerald M, Shine R (2003) Molecular phylogeny of the Australian venomous snake genus Hoplocephalus (Serpentes, Elapidae) and conservation genetics of the threatened H. stephensii. Conserv Genet 4:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinziger AP, Loudenslager EJ, Hakin DG et al (2008) Hybridization between spring- and fall-run chinook salmon returning to the Trinity River, California. North Am J Fish Manag 28:1426–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kubatko LS, Gibbs HL, Bloomquist E (2010) Inferring species-level phylogenies and taxonomic distinctiveness using multi-locus data in Sistrurus rattlesnakes. Syst Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Meng C, Kubatko LS (2009) Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. Theor Popul Biol 75:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Missouri Department of Conservation (2000) Missouri Animals of Conservation Concern. Jefferson City, MOGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy RW, Crabtree CB (1988) Genetic identification of a natural hybrid rattlesnake: Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus × C. viridis viridis. Herpetologica 44:119–123Google Scholar
  24. Parham JF, Simison WB, Kozak KH, Feldman CR, Shi H (2001) New Chinese turtles: Endangered or invalid? A reassessment of two species using mitochondrial DNA, allozyme electrophoresis, and known locality specimens. Anim Conserv 4:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Extraction with phenol:chloroform. In: Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual, pp. E.3-E.4. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, PlainviewGoogle Scholar
  28. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stuart BL, Parham JF (2007) Recent hybrid origin of three rare Chinese turtles. Conserv Genet 8:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sumner J, Webb JK, Shine R, Keogh JS (2010) Molecular and morphological assessment of Australia’s most endangered snake, Hoplocephalus bungaroides, reveals two evolutionarily significant units for conservation. Conserv Genet 11:747–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swofford, D (2000) PAUP* 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Szymanski J (1998) Status assessment for eastern Massasauga (Sistrurus c. catenatus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  33. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2008) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of native species that are candidates for listing as endangered or threatened; annual notice of findings on resubmitted petitions; annual description of progress on listing actions; proposed rule. Federal Register 73:75175‐75244Google Scholar
  34. Wayne R (1996) Conservation genetics in the Candidae. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 75–118Google Scholar
  35. Wilson PJ, Grewal S, Lawford JNM et al (2000) DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the grey wolf. Can J Zool 78:2156–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Lisle Gibbs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Murphy
    • 1
  • James E. Chiucchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal BiologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations