Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 337–341 | Cite as

Phylogenetic position of a threatened stag beetle, Lucanus datunensis (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) in Taiwan and implications for conservation

  • Chung-Ping Lin
  • Jen-Pan Huang
  • Yat-Hung Lee
  • Ming-Yu Chen
Short Communication


Among nine endemic Lucanus beetles in Taiwan, L. datunensis is the island’s smallest and most threatened species. It currently exists as only one population located in tall grasslands of Mt. Datun in the Yangmingshan National Park. Given the isolated population, unique subtropical grassland, and the threats resulting from human activities, L. datunensis raises immediate conservation concern for its long-term survival. Phylogenies reconstructed from combined mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (1310 bps) and nuclear wingless (436 bps) genes were resolved and placed L. datunensis as a phylogenetically distinct species sister to L. fortunei from China. All 13 examined individuals of L. datunensis shared just one mitochondrial haplotype suggesting extremely low mitochondrial DNA diversity and a small effective population size. L. datunensis and morphologically closest L. miwai were distantly related and appear to have evolved in parallel the life history traits of a small body size and diurnal mate-searching behavior. We hypothesize that these habitat-associated characters are convergent adaptations that have evolved in response to shifts from forests to grasslands.


Yangmingshan National Park Cox1 Wingless Convergent adaptation Subtropical grassland 



This study was supported by research grants from the Yangmingshan National Park and National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 94-2311-B-029-007). We would like to thank Chien-An Chen, Che-Yun Kuan, and Liang-Jong Wang who helped the field works. We also appreciate Alfried Vogler and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.


  1. Alfaro ME, Huelsenbeck JP (2006) Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty. Syst Biol 55:89–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg A, Ehnstrom B, Gustafsson L, Hallingback T, Jonsell M, Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests—distribution and habitat associations. Conserv Biol 8:718–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bienkowski P, Titlyanova AA, Shibareva SV (2006) Chemical properties of litter of forest and grassland ecosystems: transect studies in Siberia (Russia). Pol J Ecol 54:91–104Google Scholar
  4. Brower AVZ, Desalle R (1998) Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol Biol 7:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang YZ (2006) Stag beetles, 1st edn. Yuan-Liou Publisher, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou CH, Li RT (1991) An ecological study on Miscanthus in Yangmingshan national park. Yangmingshan National Park, Construction and Planning Administration, Ministry of the Interior, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark JT (1977) Aspects of variation in the stag beetle Lucanus cervus (L.) (Coleoptera, Lucanidae). Syst Entomol 2:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelman A, Rubinr DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goka K, Kojima H, Okabe K (2004) Biological invasion caused by commercialization of stag beetles in Japan. Glob Environ Res 8:67–74Google Scholar
  12. Harvey DJ, Gange AC (2006) Size variation and mating success in the stag beetle, Lucanus cervus. Physiol Entomol 31:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17:754–755Google Scholar
  14. Kawano K (1992) Male dimorphism and alternative mating strategies in Lucanid beetles: evolutionary process through competition among males. Gekkan Mushi (Tokyo) 246:9–16Google Scholar
  15. Knell RJ, Pomfret JC, Tomkins JL (2003) The limits of elaboration: curved allometries reveal the constraints on mandible size in stag beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Konstantinou KI, Lin CH, Liang WT (2007) Seismicity characteristics of a potentially active quaternary volcano: the Tatun Volcano Group, northern Taiwan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 160:300–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotze DJ, O’Hara RB (2003) Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135:138–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krajcik M (2001) Lucanidae of the world, catalogue—part 1, checklist of the stag beetles of the world (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). M. Krajcik, Most, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin CH, Konstantinou KI, Liang WT, Pu HC, Lin YM, You SH, Huang YP (2005a) Preliminary analysis of tectonic earthquakes and volcanoseismic signals recorded at the Tatun volcanic group, northern Taiwan. Geophys Res Lett 32:L10313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin CH, Konstantinou KI, Pu HC, Hsu CC, Lin YM, You SH, Huang YP (2005b) Preliminary results of seismic monitoring at Tatun volcanic area of northern Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 16:563–577Google Scholar
  21. Liu CC, Jhong KY, Huang S, Lin SM (2008) A preliminary survey on succession and contact zone between bamboos and grasslands in Yangmingshan region. Research Reports of the Yangmingshan National Park, Taipei, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  22. New TR (2005) ‘Inordinate fondness’: a threat to beetles in south east Asia? J Insect Conserv 9:147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Posada D, Buckley TR (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53:793–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rink M, Sinsch U (2007) Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation. J Zool 272:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419Google Scholar
  27. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701Google Scholar
  28. Smith ABT (2006) A review of the family-group names for the superfamily Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) with corrections to nomenclature and a current classification. Coleopt Bull 60:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation, 1st edn. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  30. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Ping Lin
    • 1
  • Jen-Pan Huang
    • 1
  • Yat-Hung Lee
    • 1
  • Ming-Yu Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life Science, Center for Tropical Ecology and BiodiversityTunghai UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations