Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Levels of gene flow among populations of a wolf spider in a recently fragmented habitat: current versus historical rates

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene flow among populations is important for countering the deleterious effects of random genetic drift and inbreeding, as well as spreading beneficial mutations. Wind-driven aerial dispersal is known to occur in numerous plants and invertebrates. Its evolution suggests that historically, suitable habitat patches were dense enough to make such undirected dispersal evolutionarily advantageous. Using microsatellite markers we assessed the population genetic structure of seven populations of a wolf spider (Rabidosa rabida) capable of ballooning. Historically, each spider population received a mean of 1.5 migrants per generation from the other six populations. Over the past several generations the number of migrants reaching a population is only 0.2. This statistically significant reduction in gene flow coincides with high levels of habitat fragmentation and suggests that undirected aerial dispersal is ineffective in this fragmented landscape. Further, individuals within populations showed signficantly elevated levels of homozygosity relative to Hardy–Weinberg expectations, suggesting that cursorial dispersal may be very limited and genetic structure within populations exists. Inbreeding coefficients averaged 0.18 over all seven populations with very little variation among populations (s = 0.02). Fitness was lower in smaller populations relative to larger ones. Altered landscapes pose evolutionary dilemmas for many metapopulations and species that depend on undirected movement for dispersal may be particularly vulnerable to habitat fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Beerli P, Felsenstein J (1999) Maximum likelihood estimation of migration rates and population numbers of two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152:763–773

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JR, Bohan DA, Shaw EM, Weyman GS (2005) Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models. Bull Entomol Res 95:69–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonte D, van Belle S, Maelfait J-P (2007) Maternal care and reproductive state-dependent mobility determine natal dispersal in a wolf spider. Animal Behav 74:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgan DJ, Brown S, Major RE, Christie F, Gray MR, Cassis G (2002) Population genetics of wolf spiders of fragmented habitat in the wheat belt of New South Wales. Mol Ecol 11:2295–2305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faubet P, Waples RS, Gaggiotti OE (2007) Evaluating the performance of multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Mol Ecol 16:1149–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Scheibly KL, Reed DH (2008) Experimental evolution of the genetic load and its implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 62:2236–2249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone MH, Morgan CE, Hultsch A-L, Farrow RA, Dowse JE (1987) Ballooning spiders in Missouri, USA, and New South Wales, Australia: family and mass distributions. J Arachnol 15:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, May RM (1977) Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269:578–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn M, Sarre SD, Henle K (2007) The tales of two geckos: does dispersal prevent extinction in recently fragmented populations? Mol Ecol 16:3299–3312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johanssen J, Lubin Y (2001) Evidence for kin-structured group founding and limited juvenile dispersal in the sub-social spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae, Eresidae). J Arachnol 29:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Primmer GR, Merila J (2007) Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol 16:2693–2700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Cohen D, Hastings A (1984) Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theor Popul Biol 26:165–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader H-J (1984) Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol Conserv 29:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks B (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern Analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-351. Portland

  • Michalski SG, Durka W (2007) High selfing and high inbreeding depression in peripheral populations of Juncus aratus. Mol Ecol 16:4715–4727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez MG, Fandino LB (1996) Genetic variability and gene flow in Metepeira ventura (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 24:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez MG, Haakonsen KE (1999) Gene flow among habitat patches on a fragmented landscape in the spider Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae). Heredity 83:580–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH (2004) Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Animal Conserv 7:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Nicholas AC (2008) Analysis of temporal and spatial variation in a suite of life history traits for two species of wolf spider in the genus Rabidosa. Ecol Entomol 33:488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Nicholas AC, Stratton GE (2007a) Inbreeding levels and prey abundance interact to determine fecundity in natural populations of two species of wolf spider. Conserv Genet 8:1061–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Nicholas AC, Stratton GE (2007b) The genetic quality of individuals directly impacts population dynamics. Animal Conserv 10:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samu F, Sunderland KD, Szinetar C (1999) Scale-dependent dispersal and distribution patterns of spiders in agricultural systems: a review. J Arachnol 27:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM et al (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions if fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12923–12926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ, Dytham C (1998) The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Proc Royal Soc London B 265:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watling JI, Donnelly MA (2006) Fragments as islands: a synthesis of faunal responses to habitat patchiness. Conserv Biol 20:1016–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weyman GS (1993) A review of the possible causative factors and significance of ballooning in spiders. Ethol Ecol Evol 5:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The University of Mississippi provided funding for part of this research. We thank Christian Felton, Pat Miller, and Amy Nicholas for their assistance. Brice Noonan provided useful comments on a prior draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Reed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, D.H., Teoh, VH., Stratton, G.E. et al. Levels of gene flow among populations of a wolf spider in a recently fragmented habitat: current versus historical rates. Conserv Genet 12, 331–335 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9995-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9995-9

Keywords

Navigation