Skip to main content
Log in

Drainage-independent genetic structure and high genetic diversity of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in northern Europe

Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) are among the most critically threatened bivalve molluscs worldwide. An understanding of spatial patterns of genetic diversity is crucial for the development of integrative conservation strategies. We used microsatellites to study the genetic diversity and differentiation of 14 populations of M. margaritifera in central Sweden, an area which was described as a major secondary contact zone in postglacial colonisation for other species. Genetic diversity of Swedish pearl mussel populations was much greater than in central and southern Europe but similar to the genetic diversity observed in the northeastern portion of their European range. Genetic differentiation among populations was pronounced but to a large extent independent from present-day drainage systems. The complex patterns of genetic diversity and differentiation in pearl mussel seem to be strongly influenced by the species’ high degree of specialisation and extraordinary life history strategy which involves facultative hermaphrodism and an obligatory encystment stage on a host fish. Genetic drift effects and anthropogenic disturbances resulting in reduction of population size and loss of connectivity are less pronounced in northern pearl mussel populations compared to those in central and southern Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bauer G (1987) Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. J Anim Ecol 56:691–704. doi:10.2307/5077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1988) Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in central Europe. Biol Conserv 45:239–253. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90056-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1992) Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. J Anim Ecol 61:425–436. doi:10.2307/5333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg DJ, Christian AD, Guttman SI (2007) Population genetic structure of three freshwater mussels (Unionidae) species within a small stream system: significant variation at local spatial scales. Freshw Biol 52:1427–1439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01756.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invetebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogan AE (1993) Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionoida): a search for causes. Am Zool 33:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouza C, Castro J, Martínez P, Amaro R, Fernández C, Ondina P, Outeiro A, San Miguel E (2007) Threatened freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in NW Spain: low and very structured genetic variation in southern peripheral populations assessed using microsatellite markers. Conserv Genet 8:937–948. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9248-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciofi C, Bruford MW (1999) Genetic structure and gene flow among komodo dragon populations inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Mol Ecol 8:17–30. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00734.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elderkin CL, Christian AD, Metcalde-Smith JL, Berg DJ (2008) Population genetics and phylogeography of freshwater mussels in North America, Elliptio dilatata and Actinonaias ligamentina (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Mol Ecol 17:2149–2163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03745.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J (2005) Conservation genetics and ecology of european freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, Germany. Available at: http://tumb1.biblio.tu-muenchen.de/publ/diss/ww/2005/geist.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2009

  • Geist J, Auerswald K (2007) Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshw Biol 55:2299–2316. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01812.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Kuehn R (2005) Genetic diversity and differentiation of central European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) populations: implications for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 14:425–439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02420.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Kuehn R (2008) Host-parasite interactions in oligotrophic stream ecosystems: the roles of life history strategy and ecological niche. Mol Ecol 17:997–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03636.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Rottmann O, Schröder W, Kühn R (2003) Development of microsatellite markers for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Mol Ecol Notes 3:444–446. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00476.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Porkka M, Kuehn R (2006) The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) streams. Aquat Conserv 16:251–266. doi:10.1002/aqc.721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Wunderlich H, Kuehn R (2008) Use of mollusc shells for DNA-based molecular analyses. J Molluscan Stud 74:337–343. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyn025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Kolahsa M, Gum B, Kuehn R (2009) The importance of genetic cluster recognition for the conservation of migratory fish species: the example of the endangered European Huchen (Hucho hucho L.). J Fish Biol (in press)

  • Goudet J (1995) F-STAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486

  • Grobler PJ, Jones JW, Johnson NA, Beaty B, Struthers J, Neves RJ, Hallerman EM (2006) Patterns of genetic differentiation and conservation of the slabside pearlymussel, Lexingtonia dolabelloides (Lea, 1840) in the Tennessee river drainage. J Molluscan Stud 72:65–72. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyi055

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross R, Kühn R, Baars M, Schröder W, Stein H, Rottmann O (2001) Genetic differentiation of European grayling populations across the Main, Danube and Elbe drainages in Bavaria. J Fish Biol 58:264–280. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00513.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gum B, Gross R, Geist J (2009) Conservation genetics and management implications for European grayling, Thymallus thymallus: synthesis of phylogeography and population genetics. Fish Manag Ecol 16:37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2008.00641.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometric 48:361–372. doi:10.2307/2532296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton KE, Ferguson A, Taggart JB, Tomasson T, Walker A, Fahy E (1989) Post-glacial colonisation of brown trout, Salmo trutta L.: Ldh-5 as a phylogeographic marker locus. J Fish Biol 35:651–664. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03017.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hänfling B, Brandl R (1998) Genetic variability, population size and isolation in distinct populations in the freshwater fish Cottus gobio L. Mol Ecol 7:1625–1632. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00465.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GM (1996) Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 58:247–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913. doi:10.1038/35016000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Journel A, Huijbregts C (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London, UK

  • Jungbluth JR, Coomans HE, Groh H (1985) Bibliographie der Flussperlmuschel Margaritifera margaritifera (Linn. 1785). Verslagenen Technische Gegevens No. 41 Institut voor Taxonomische Zoologie, Universiteit Amsterdam

  • Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF et al (2004) The global decline of nonmarine molluscs. Bioscience 54:321–330. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0321:TGDONM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchordom A, Araujo R, Erpenbeck D, Ramos MA (2003) Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the endangered European Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 78:235–252. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00158.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MP, Blinn DW, Keim P (2002) Correlations between observed dispersal capabilities and patterns of genetic differentiation in populations of four aquatic insect species from the Arizona white mountains, USA. Freshw Biol 47:1660–1673. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00911.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of genetic distances and phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170. doi:10.1007/BF02300753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neves RJ, Bogan AE, Williams JD, Ahlstedt SA, Hartfield PW (1997) Status of aquatic molluscs in the southeastern United States: a downward spiral of diversity. In: Benz GW, Collins DE (eds) Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur Special Publication 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrgrann O (2001) Spridningsavstånd mellan och fragmentering av bestånd av flodpärlmussla (Margaritifera margaritifera) i Västernorrlands län. Självständigt arbete Institutionen för Naturvetenskap och Miljö. Stencil. English abstract. Mitthögskolan, Härnösand. 21 pp

  • Ota T (1993) Dispan: genetic distance and phylogenetic analyses software. Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–855. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piertney SB, MacColl ADC, Bacon PJ, Dallas JF (1998) Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Mol Ecol 7:1645–1654. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00493.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Cornuet JM (1999) GENECLASS: a program for assignation and exclusion using molecular markers. URLB/INRA, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:845–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranke W, Rappe C, Soler T, Funegård P, Karlsson L, Thorell L (1999) Baltic salmon rivers—status in the late 1990 s as reported by the countries in the Baltic region. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Gothenburg, Sweden, 69 pp

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995a) GENEPOP version 3.4: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995b) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283. doi:10.2307/2410454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225. doi:10.2307/2409177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg H, Karlberg A, Norrgrann O (2008) Status, trender och skydd för flodpärlmusslan I Sverige. ISBN: 1403-624X

  • Strayer DL, Downing JA, Haag WR et al (2004) Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America’s most imperilled animals. Bioscience 54:429–439. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0429:CPOPMN]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Fumagalli L, Wust-Saucy AG, Cosson JF (1998) Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mol Ecol 7:453–464. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00289.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46:1431–1446. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00771.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wächtler K, Dreher-Mansur MC, Richter T (2001) Larval types and early postlarval biology in naiads (Unionoida). In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (eds) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoidea. Springer, Heidelberg. Ecol Stud 145:93–125

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370. doi:10.2307/2408641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young MR, Cosgrove PJ, Hastie LC (2001) The extent of, and causes for, the decline of a highly threatened naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera. In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (eds) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoidea. Springer, Heidelberg. Ecol Stud 145:337–357

  • Ziuganov V, Zotin A, Nezlin L, Tretiakov V (1994) The freshwater pearl mussels and their relationships with salmonid fish. VNIRO, Russian Federal Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow, 104 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was initiated and financially supported by the Nature Conservation Office at the County Administrative Board of Västernorrland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juergen Geist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geist, J., Söderberg, H., Karlberg, A. et al. Drainage-independent genetic structure and high genetic diversity of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in northern Europe. Conserv Genet 11, 1339–1350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9963-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9963-4

Keywords

Navigation