Skip to main content
Log in

Fitness costs associated with low genetic variation are reduced in a harsher environment in amphibian island populations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A basic premise of conservation geneticists is that low levels of genetic variation are associated with fitness costs in terms of reduced survival and fecundity. These fitness costs may frequently vary with environmental factors and should increase under more stressful conditions. However, there is no consensus on how fitness costs associated with low genetic variation change under natural conditions in relation to the stressfulness of the environment. On the Swedish west coast, natterjack toad Bufo calamita populations show a strong population genetic structure and large variation in the amount of within-population genetic variation. We experimentally examined the survival of natterjack larvae from six populations with different genetic variation in three thermal environments corresponding to (a) the mean temperature of natural ponds (stable, laboratory), (b) a high temperature environment occurring in desiccating ponds (stable, laboratory) and (c) an outdoor treatment mimicking the natural, variable thermal conditions (fluctuating, semi-natural). We found that larvae in the outdoor treatment had poorer survival than larvae in the stable environments suggesting that the outdoor treatment was more stressful. Overall, populations with higher genetic variation had higher larval survival. However, a significant interaction between treatments and genetic variation indicated that fitness costs associated with low genetic variation were less severe in the outdoor treatment. Thus, we found no support for the hypothesis that fitness costs associated with low genetic variation increase under more stressful conditions. Our results suggest that natural thermal stress may mask fitness losses associated with low genetic variation in these populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Altwegg R, Reyer HU (2003) Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57:872–882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrén C, Nilson G (1985) Habitat and other environmental characteristics of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita Laur) in Sweden. Brit J Herp 6:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates D (2008) Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 4:390–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou JD (1997) Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J Hered 88:169–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol Ecol 13:3021–3031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Sarkar D (2006) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Beebee TJC (1983) The natterjack toad. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Romansic JM, Kiesecker JM et al (2003) Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines. Diver Distrib 9:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canty A (2006) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Chen XF (1993) Comparison of inbreeding and outbreeding in hermaphroditic Arianta arbustorum (L). Heredity 71:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002) Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347–2358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • David P (1998) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D, Mackay T (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Garner TWJ, De Bernardi F (2007) Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by postglacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Mol Ecol 16:1787–1797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Cons 126:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambrige University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U (2005) Rödlistade arter i Sverige. SLU Publikationsservice, Uppsala, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH (1998) Population genetics, a concise guide. The John Hopkins University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1998) Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. J Evol Biol 11:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Primmer CR, Merilä J (2007) Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol 13:2693–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeuffer R, Coltman DW, Chapuis JL et al (2007) Unexpected heterozygosity in an island mouflon population founded by a single pair of individuals. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:527–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen TN, Sorensen P, Pedersen KS et al (2006) Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173:1329–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langhelle A, Lindell MJ, Nyström P (1999) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on amphibian embryonic and larval development. J Herpetol 33:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao W, Reed DH (2009) Inbreeding-environment interactions increase extinction risk. Anim Conserv 12:54–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niehaus AC, Wilson RS, Franklin CE (2006) Short- and long-term consequences of thermal variation in the larval environment of anurans. J Anim Ecol 75:686–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oromi N, Marquis O, Miaud C et al (2008) Influence of ambient ultraviolet radiation on Bufo calamita egg development in a semiarid zone (Catalonia, Spain). J Environ Biol 29:135–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel, population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton J (2004) Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best. Trends Ecol Evol 19:613–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K et al. (2006) coda: output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Pray LA, Schwartz JM, Goodnight CJ et al (1994) Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression—implications for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 8:562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogell B (2009). Genetic variation and local adaptation in peripheral populations of toads. PhD thesis, Uppsala University

  • Rogell B, Hofman M, Eklund M et al (2009) The interaction of multiple environmental stressors affect adaptation to a novel habitat in the natterjack toad Bufo calamita. J Evol Biol 22:2267–2277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogell B, Thörngren H, Palm S et al. (2010) Genetic structure in peripheral populations of the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, as revealed by AFLP. Conserv Genet 11:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Beebee TJC (2003) Population on the verge of a mutational meltdown? Fitness costs of genetic load for an amphibian in the wild. Evolution 1:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Beebee TJC (2005) Intraspecific competition disadvantages inbred natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) genotypes over outbred ones in a shared pond environment. J Anim Ecol 1:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DE (1994) The effect of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum. Ecology 75:1383–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swindell WR, Bouzat JL (2006) Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 60:1014–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ (2008) Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62:917–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Schmid B et al (2007) Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. J Evol Biol 20:534–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Per Westerfelt, Hampus Ericsson and Manuel Freibughaus for help in the field and in the laboratory. Mårten Hjernquist, Alex Richter-Boix, Torsten Nygaard Kristensen, Alexei Maklakov and Gustaf Granath commented on earlier versions of this manuscript. This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Rogell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogell, B., Thörngren, H., Laurila, A. et al. Fitness costs associated with low genetic variation are reduced in a harsher environment in amphibian island populations. Conserv Genet 11, 489–496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0039-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0039-2

Keywords

Navigation