Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation

Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of genetic variation for maintaining biological diversity and evolutionary processes has been recognized by researchers for decades. This realization has prompted agreements by world leaders to conserve genetic diversity, and this is an explicit goal of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Nevertheless, very limited action has been taken to protect genetic diversity on a global scale. International conservation efforts to halt biodiversity loss focus on habitats and species, whereas little or no attention is paid to gene level variation. By this year, 2010, world leaders have agreed that a significant reduction of the rate of biodiversity loss should have been achieved. However, gene level diversity is still not monitored, indicators that can help identify threats to genetic variation are missing, and there is no strategy for how genetic aspects can be included in biodiversity targets beyond 2010. Important findings and conclusions from decades of conservation genetic research are not translated into concrete conservation action in the arena of international policy development. There is an urgent need for conservation geneticists worldwide to become involved in policy and practical conservation work beyond the universities and research institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allendorf FW, England PR, Luikart G, Ritchie PA, Ryman N (2008) Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. TREE 23:327–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (2008) The history, purview, and future of conservation genetics. In: Carroll SP, Fox C (eds) Conservation biology: evolution in action. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowkett AE (2009) Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Cons Biol 23:773–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2009) Progress towards the European 2010 biodiversity target. EEA report no 4/2009, Copenhagen

  • Ehrenfeld D (1970) Biological conservation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1970) Sir William Macleay memorial lecture 1970: variation—the essence of life. Proc Linnean Soc NSW 95:158–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH, Soulé ME (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2004) A primer of conservation genetics. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Palmé A, Josefsson M, Utter F, Ryman N (2006) Release of alien populations in Sweden. Ambio 35:255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Larsson LC, Palmé A, Charlier J, Josefsson M, Ryman N (2008a) Potentials for monitoring gene level biodiversity: using Sweden as an example. Biodiv Conserv 17:893–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Jonsson B-G, Ihse M, Marissink M, Dock Gustafsson A-M, Ebenhard T, Hagberg L, Piriz L, Stål P-O, von Walter S, Wramner P (2008b) Wanted: scientists in the CBD process. Conserv Biol 22:814–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Nilsson T, Primmer C, Ryman N, Allendorf FW (2009) Importance of genetics in the interpretation of favourable conservation status. Conserv Biol 23:1378–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Allendorf FW, Aroner LC, Baker CS, Gregovich DP, Hansen MM, Jackson JJ, Kendall KC, McKelvey K, Neel MC, Olivieri I, Ryman N, Schwartz MK, Short Bull R, Stetz JB, Tallmon DA, Taylor BL, Vojta CD, Waller DM, Waples RS (2010) Neglect of genetic diversity in implementation of the convention on biological diversity. Conserv Biol 24:86–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EE, Hansen MM (2008) Waking the dead: the valve of population genetic analyses of historical samples. Fish Fish 9:450–461

    Google Scholar 

  • O′Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 133:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryman N, Laikre L (1991) Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conserv Biol 5:325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryman N, Utter FM (1987) Population genetics and fishery management. Washington Sea Grant Publications/University of Washington Press, Seattle and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas L (1983) Genetics and conservation, a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2006) Global biodiversity outlook 2. Montreal, 81+vii p

  • Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) (1980) Conservation biology, an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan MS (2009) Gene banks for a warming planet. Science 325:517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Lena Larsson, Nils Ryman and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript. Financial support was provided by Formas (the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning), the Swedish Research Council, Carl Tryggers Stiftelse. Parts of the work were conducted within the framework of the BaltGene project funded by BONUS Baltic Organisations’ Network for Funding Science EEIG. Support from the ESF Science Networking Programme ConGen is also greatly appreciated. This work benefitted from discussions and collaborations within the Working Group on Genetic Monitoring supported by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NSF #EF-0423641) and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NSF #DEB-0553768) and chaired by Drs. Fred W. Allendorf and Michael K. Schwartz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Laikre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laikre, L. Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conserv Genet 11, 349–354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0037-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0037-4

Keywords

Navigation