Conservation Genetics

, 10:1309 | Cite as

Geographic and genetic isolation in spring-associated Eurycea salamanders endemic to the Edwards Plateau region of Texas

  • Lauren K. Lucas
  • Zachariah Gompert
  • James R. Ott
  • Chris C. Nice
Research Article

Abstract

Populations of neotenic, spring-associated salamanders of the genus Eurycea occupy discontinuous sites throughout the Edwards Plateau of central Texas and many warrant conservation attention. Here we used DNA sequence data from a nuclear (rag1) and a mitochondrial (ND4) gene to determine (1) the extent of genetic isolation among seven Edwards Plateau Eurycea populations and (2) the relationship between genetic distance and both geographic distance and hydrogeological features. Coalescent-based methods detected little gene flow among the sampled Eurycea populations, and we were unable to reject a model of complete isolation for any pair of populations. These findings were consistent with the relatively high genetic distances we detected among the sampled Eurycea populations (pairwise ϕST ranged from 0.249 to 0.924). We detected a positive correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance, which is consistent with a pattern of isolation by distance. However, while controlling for geographic distance, we did not detect a positive relationship between genetic distance and aquifer or river distance. Thus, we found no evidence that aquifers and/or rivers serve as dispersal corridors among isolated Eurycea populations. Based on these results, we have no evidence that re-colonization of spring sites by migrant salamanders following local extirpation would be likely. Our findings indicate that spring-associated Eurycea salamander populations occupying the Edwards Plateau region are genetically isolated, and that each of these populations should be considered a distinct management unit.

Keywords

Eurycea Migration rate Coalescent Endemism Isolation by distance Edwards Plateau 

References

  1. Abbott PL, Woodruff CM (1986) The Balcones escarpment: geology, hydrology, ecology and social development in central Texas. Geological Survey of America, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  2. Arevalo E, Davis SK, Sites JW (1994) Mitochondrial-DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic-relationships among 8 chromosome races of the Sceloporus-Grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Syst Biol 43:387–418. doi:10.2307/2413675 Google Scholar
  3. Baker VR (1975) Flood hazards along the Balcones escarpment in central Texas: alternative approaches to their recognition, mapping and management. Univ Tex Austin Bureau Econ Geol Geol Circular 75:5–27Google Scholar
  4. Barker RA, Bush PW, Baker ET (1994) Geological history and hydrogeologic setting of the Edwards–Trinity aquifer system west-central Texas. US Geological Survey, AustinGoogle Scholar
  5. Brune G (1981) Springs of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CC, Gillig D, McCarl BA (2001) Effects of climatic change on a water dependent regional economy: a study of the Texas Edwards Aquifer. Clim Change 49:397–409. doi:10.1023/A:1010617531401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chenoweth SF, Hughes JM, Keenan CP, Lavery S (1998) Concordance between dispersal and mitochondrial gene flow: isolation by distance in a tropical teleost, Lates calcarifer (Australian barramundi). Heredity 80:187–197. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00292.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chippindale PT (1998) Systematic status of the San Marcos salamander, Eurycea nana (Caudata: Plethodontidae). Copeia 1998:1046–1049. doi:10.2307/1447356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chippindale PT, Price AH, Weins JJ, Hillis DM (2000) Phylogenetic relationships and systematic revision of central Texas Hemidactyliine Plethodontid salamanders. Herpetol Monogr 14:1–80. doi:10.2307/1467045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook BD, Pringle CM, Hughes JM (2008) Phylogeography of an Island endemic, the Puerto Rican freshwater crab (Epilobocera sinuatifrons). J Hered 99:157–164. doi:10.1093/jhered/esm126 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Furmankiewicz J, Altringham J (2007) Genetic structure in a swarming brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus) population: evidence for mating at swarming sites. Conserv Genet 8:913–923. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9246-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Hey J, Nielsen R (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167:747–760. doi:10.1534/genetics.103.024182 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hey J, Nielsen R (2006) IM documentation. http://lifesci.rutgers.edu/~heylab/HeylabSoftware.htm#IM. Cited 3 May 2008
  17. Hillis D, Chamberlain DA, Wilcox TP, Chippindale PT (2001) A new species of subterranean blind salamander (Plethodontidae: Hermidactyliini: Eurycea: Typhlomolge) from Austin, Texas, and a systematic revision of central Texas paedomorphic salamanders. Herptelogica 57:266–280Google Scholar
  18. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL (1985) Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Loáiciga HA, Maidment DR, Valdes JB (2000) Climate-change impacts in a regional karst aquifer, Texas, USA. J Hydrol (Amst) 227:173–194. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00179-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Longley G (1981) The Edwards Aquifer: earth’s most diverse groundwater ecosystem? Int J Speleology 11:123–128Google Scholar
  21. Moritz C (1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130:217–228. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.00217.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson JM (1993) Population size, distribution, and life history of Eurycea nana in the San Marcos River. MS thesis, Southwest Texas State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen R, Wakeley J (2001) Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158:885–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. R Development Core Team (2007). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
  25. Roberge C, Normandeau E, Einum S, Guderley H, Bernatchez L (2008) Genetic consequences of interbreeding between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: insights from the transcriptome. Mol Ecol 17:314–324. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03438.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider S, Kueffer JM, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN ver 2.0. A software program for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology and Ecology, University of Geneva, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Segelbacher G, Hoglund J, Storch I (2003) From connectivity to isolation: genetic consequences of population fragmentation in capercaillie across Europe. Mol Ecol 12:1773–1780. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01873.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural-populations. Science 236:787–792. doi:10.1126/science.3576198 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Telfair RC (1999) Texas: wildlife resources and land uses. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  30. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic-analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA-sequence data. 3. cladaogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Townsend AK, Rimmer CC, Latta SC, Lovette IJ (2007) Ancient differentiation in the single-island avian radiation of endemic Hispartiolan chat-tanagers (Aves : Calyptophilus). Mol Ecol 16:3634–3642. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03422.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tupa DD, Davis WK (1976) Population-dynamics of San-Marcos salamander, Eurycea nana Bishop. Tex J Sci 27:179–195Google Scholar
  33. USFWS (1980) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; listing of the San Marcos salamander as threatened, the San Marcos gambusia as endangered, and the listing of critical habitat for Texas wild rice, San Marcos salamander, San Marcos gambusia, and fountain darter. Fed Regist 45(136):47355–47364Google Scholar
  34. Wang IA, Gilk SE, Smoker WW, Gharrett AJ (2007) Outbreeding effect on embryo development in hybrids of allopatric pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) populations, a potential consequence of stock translocation. Aquaculture 272:S152–S160. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F-ST not equal 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82:117–125. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56:330–338. doi:10.1086/279872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren K. Lucas
    • 1
  • Zachariah Gompert
    • 2
  • James R. Ott
    • 1
  • Chris C. Nice
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Population and Conservation Biology ProgramTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations