Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of a remnant lake sturgeon population’s utility as a source for reintroductions in the Ohio River system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate source population may be crucial to the long-term success of reintroduction programs. Appropriate source populations often are those that originate from the same genetic lineage as native populations. However, source populations also should exhibit high levels of genetic diversity to maximize their capacity to adapt to variable environmental conditions. Finally, it is preferable if source populations are genetically representative of historical lineages with little or no contamination from non-native or domesticated stocks. Here, we use nuclear (microsatellite) and cytoplasmic (mitochondrial control region) markers to assess the genetic suitability of a potential source population inhabiting the White River in Indiana: the last extant lake sturgeon population in the Ohio River drainage. The White River population exhibited slightly lower levels of genetic diversity than other lake sturgeon populations. However, the population’s two private microsatellite alleles and three private haplotypes suggest a unique evolutionary trajectory. Population assignment tests revealed only two putative migrants in the White River, indicating the population has almost completely maintained its genetic integrity. Additionally, pairwise F ST estimates indicated significant levels of genetic divergence between the White River and seven additional lake sturgeon populations, suggesting its genetic distinctiveness. These data indicate that the White River population may be the most suitable source population for future lake sturgeon reintroductions throughout the Ohio River drainage. Furthermore, the White River population appears to be a reservoir of unique genetic information and reintroduction may be a necessary strategy to ensure the persistence of this important genetic lineage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrendal J, Walker CW, Sundqvist A, Hellborg L, Vilà C (2004) Genetic evaluation of an otter translocation program. Conserv Genet 5:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandelt H, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16(1):37–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartron ML, Swank DR, Rutherford ES, Scribner KT (2004) Methodological bias in estimates of strain composition and straying of hatchery—produced steelhead in Lake Michigan tributaries. N Am J Fish Manage 24(4):1288–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GC (1983) Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Beckenbach AT, Smith MJ (1993) Intraspecific DNA sequence variation of the mitochondrial control region of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanous). Mol Biol Evol 10(2):326–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch RM, Binkowski FP (2002) Spawning behavior of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). J Appl Ich 18:570–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DM, Pflieger WL (1981) Abundance and life history of the lake, pallid, and shovelnose sturgeons in Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Endangered Species Project SE-1-6 Final Report, Columbia

  • Carvalho GR (1993) Evolutionary aspects of fish distribution: genetic variability and adaptation. J Fish Biol 43(Suppl A):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary process in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15(7):290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan PW, Libants SV, Elliott RF, Scribner KT (2006) Genetic population structure of remnant lake sturgeon populations in the Upper Great Lakes Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1478–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drauch AM (2006) Genetic considerations of lake sturgeon reintroductions in the Midwestern United States. MS thesis. Purdue University, Lafayette

  • Drauch AM, Rhodes OE Jr (2007) Genetic evaluation of the lake sturgeon reintroduction program in the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. N Am J Fish Manage 27(2):434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einum S, Fleming IA (2001) Implications of stocking: ecological interactions between wild and released salmonids. Nordic J Freshw Res 75:56–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons NN, Buskirk SW, Smith MH (1997) Genetic changes in reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep populations. J Wild Manage 61(3):863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluxus Technology, Ltd (2004) Network vers. 4.2.1. Available: http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm. Cited 21 May 2007

  • Fritzner NG, Hansen MM, Madsen SS, Kristiansen K (2001) Use of microsatellite markers for identification of indigenous brown trout in a geographical region heavily influenced by stocked domestic trout. J Fish Biol 58:1197–1210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glaubitz JC (2004) CONVERT: a user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol Ecol Notes 4:309–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available at http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. Cited 5 August 2006

  • Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness WJK, Dymond JR (1961) The Lake Sturgeon. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Fish and Wildlife Branch, Maple

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Sawby R (2004) Genetic variability and life-history evolution. In: Ferrière R, Dieckmann U, Couvet D (eds) Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52(4):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1996) IUCN/SSC guidelines for reintroductions. 41st meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland, Switzerland, May 1995. Available at http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/images/IUCNPosition.pdf. Cited 5 August 2006

  • Jordan DS (1878) Manual of the vertebrates of the northern United States, including the district east of the Mississippi River, and north of North Carolina and Tennessee, exclusive of marine species. Jansen and McClurg, Chicago

  • Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-Rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, H (1993) Breeding plan to preserve the genetic variability of the Kootenai River white sturgeon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report (Project 93-27) to Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon

  • King TL, Lubinski BA, and Spidle AP (2001) Microsatellite DNA variation in Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) and cross-species amplification in the Acipenseridae. Conserv Genet 2:103–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachner EA (1956) The changing fish fauna of the upper Ohio basin. In: Tryon CA, Shapiro MA (eds) Man and the waters of the upper Ohio basin. Special publication 5, Pymatuning Laboratory of Field Biology. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1997) Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. J Mamm 78(2):320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latch EK, Rhodes OE Jr (2005) The effects of gene flow and population isolation on the genetic structure of reintroduced wild turkey populations: Are genetic signatures of source populations retained? Conserv Genet 6:981–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leberg PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 11:2445–2449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LI-COR, Inc. (1997) LI-COR 4200 Series genetic analysis manual. LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska

  • McQuown EC, Sloss BL, Sheehan RJ, Rodzen J, Tranah GJ, May B (2000) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in sturgeon: new primer sequences for Scaphirhynchus and Acipenser. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:1380–1388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQuown E, Gall GAE, May B (2002) Characterization and inheritance of six microsatellite loci in lake sturgeon. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:299–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQuown E, Krueger CC, Kincaid HL, Gall GAE, May B (2003) Genetic comparison of lake sturgeon populations: differentiation based on allelic frequencies at seven microsatellite loci. J Great Lakes Res 29(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK (1995) Genetic and ecological guidelines for species reintroduction programs: application to Great Lakes fishes. J Great Lakes Res 21(Suppl. 1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock KE, Theimer TC, Rhodes OE Jr, Greenberg DL, Keim P (2002) Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Mol Ecol 11:643–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mock KE, Latch EK, Rhodes OE (2004) Assessing losses of genetic diversity due to translocation: long-term case histories in Merriam’s turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami). Conserv Genet 5:631–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Tajima F (1981) DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 97:145–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen T (2003) The influence of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) on the productivity of wild coho salmon populations in Oregon coastal basins. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1050–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol 13:55–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson WD, Krumholz LA (1984) Distribution and status of Ohio River fishes. ORNL/Sub/79-7831/1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

  • Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet J-M, Paetkau D, Baudoin L, Estoup A (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95(6):536–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (2001) Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol 16(1):37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9197–9201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86(3):248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Runstrom A, Bruch RM, Reiter D, Cox D (2002) Lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) on the Menominee Indian Reservation: an effort toward co-management and population restoration. J Appl Ich 18:481–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn, vol 1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis, Version 3.1. Genetic and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram ST, Lindgren J, Evrard LM (1999) Reintroduction of lake sturgeon in the St. Louis River, Western Lake Superior. N Am J Fish Manage 19:815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Fish Res Bd Can, Ontario-Bulletin 184

  • Scribner KT (2002) Development of a management plan for lake sturgeon within the Great Lakes basin based on population genetic structure: mitochondrial DNA development and analysis. GLFC Research Completion Report, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Ann Arbor

  • Stephen CL, deVos JC Jr, Lee TE Jr, Bickham JW, Heffelfinger JR, Rhodes OE Jr (2005a) Population genetic analysis of Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis). J Mamm 86:782–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen CL, Whittaker DG, Gillis G, Cox LL, Rhodes OE Jr (2005b) Genetic consequences of reintroductions: an example from pronghorn antelope in Oregon. J Wild Manage 69:1463–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell CA, Leberg PL (2002) Ecological genetics and the translocation of native fishes: emerging experimental approaches. W N Am Nat 62(1):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2000) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 1.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trautman MB (1981) The fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasemägi A, Gross R, Paaver T, Koljonen M-L, Nilsson J (2005) Extensive immigration from compensatory hatchery releases into wild Atlantic salmon population in the Baltic Sea: spatio-temporal analysis over 18 years. Heredity 95(1):76–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15:1419–1439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38(6):1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh AB, Blumberg M, May B (2003) Identification of microsatellite loci in lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, and their variability in green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris. Mol Ecol Notes 3(1):47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this project came from the Wildlife Diversity Section of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Fish and Wildlife (State Wildlife Grants T-3 and T-4) and Purdue University. The authors would like to express sincere appreciation to all those involved in lake sturgeon sample collection, including Travis Moore, Craig Gemming, Dennis Topp, Chris Wilson, Kyle Piller, Kim Scribner, and Trent Sutton. We also would like to thank Andrew DeWoody and Trent Sutton for helpful comments on earlier drafts. The manuscript benefited greatly from comments from Robin Waples and two anonymous reviewers. The authors also thank the members of the Wildlife Genetics Lab and Genomic Variation Lab for help with various and sundry analysis questions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science, Meyer Hall, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Andrea M. Drauch

  2. Atterbury Fish and Wildlife Area, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Edinburgh, IN, USA

    Brant E. Fisher

  3. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 1159 Forestry Building, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Emily K. Latch, Jennifer A. Fike & Olin E. Rhodes Jr.

Authors
  1. Andrea M. Drauch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brant E. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emily K. Latch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer A. Fike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olin E. Rhodes Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea M. Drauch.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1 Microsatellite allele sizes and frequencies observed in eight lake sturgeon populations
Full size table
Appendix 2 Mitochondrial control region haplotype frequencies for 414 lake sturgeon across eight populations
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drauch, A.M., Fisher, B.E., Latch, E.K. et al. Evaluation of a remnant lake sturgeon population’s utility as a source for reintroductions in the Ohio River system. Conserv Genet 9, 1195–1209 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9441-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9441-9

keywords

Search

Navigation