Abstract
The ability to distinguish captive-bred and natural-origin individuals in the wild is critical for evaluating the impact of captive breeding programs on natural populations. Continued persistence of endangered pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) in the Missouri River is largely dependent on captive breeding efforts that spawn natural-origin adults in fish hatcheries and release their progeny into the wild. Prior to release, hatchery-origin individuals are physically marked so they can be distinguished from natural-origin individuals when recaptured. During the years 2004–2006, 24 unmarked juvenile pallid sturgeon tissue samples were collected in the Missouri River downstream of Gavins Point Dam, South Dakota, USA that were presumed natural-origin. However, these individuals were similar in size to hatchery-origin fish released in this area raising concerns that these individuals were actually hatchery-origin fish with lost or malfunctioning tags. We used microsatellite based parentage analysis to determine if the unmarked fish were members of hatchery families that had been released in this area. This retrospective genetic tagging approach revealed that 23 of 24 unmarked fish were indeed hatchery-origin. The origin of the remaining individual remains unknown because genetic samples were not available from all of the families released below the dam and the unassigned fish may have originated from one of these un-sampled families. These results provide important insight into the conservation status of endangered pallid sturgeon as well as provide data important for guiding management decisions. Our results also demonstrate the efficacy of using genetic tags as an alternative or complimentary approach to physically marking individuals.
References
Buckley PA, Francis CM, Blancher P, DeSante DF, Robbins CS, Smith G, Cannell P (1998) The North American bird banding program: into the 21st century. J Field Orn 69:511–529
DeHaan PW, Ardren WR (2005) Characterization of 20 highly variable tetranucleotide microsatellite loci for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and cross-amplification in other Salvelinus species. Mol Ecol Notes 5:582–585
Dodds KG, Tate ML, McEwan JC, Crawford AM (1996) Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theo App Gen 92:966–975
Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, DeMarignac JRC, Ashley MV (2002) Genetic tagging to determine passive integrated transponder tag loss in lemon sharks. J Fish Bio 61:1309–1313
Gibbons JW, Andrews KM (2004) PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioSci 54:447–454
Hammer SA, Blankenship HL (2001) Cost comparison of marks, tags, and mark-with-tag combinations used in salmonid research. N Am J Aqu 63:171–178
Keenlyne KD, Grossman EM, Jenkins JG (1992) Fecundity of the pallid sturgeon. Trans Am Fish Soc 121:139–140
McQuown EC, Sloss BL, Sheehan RJ, Rodzen J, Tranah GJ, May B (2000) Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in sturgeon: new primer sequences for Scaphirhynchus and Acipenser. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:1380–1388
Miller LM, Kapuscinski AR (1996) Microsatellite DNA markers reveal new levels of variation in northern pike. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:971–997
Palsbøll PJ (1999) Genetic tagging: contemporary molecular ecology. Bio J Linn Soc 68:3–22
Palsbøll PJ, Allen J, Bérubé M, Clapham PJ, Feddersen TP, Hammond PS, Hudson RR, Jørgensen H, Katona S, Larsen AH, Larsen F, Lien J, Mattila DK, Sigurjónsson J, Sears R, Smith T, Sponer R, Stevick P, Øien N (1997) Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature 388:767–769
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for the pallid sturgeon. U S Federal Reg 55:36641–36647
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1993) Recovery plan for the pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. 64 pages. Available on-line at:http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plans/1993/931107.pdf
U.S. Fish, Wildliufe Service (2006) Pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) range-wide stocking and augmentation plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Billings, Montana
Vandeputte M, Mauger S, Dupont-Nivet M (2006) An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion. Mol Ecol Notes 6:265–267
Acknowledgments
Funding for this project was provided by the USFWS Region 6 Fisheries Program. We would like to thank Kirk Steffensen, Jeff Koch, Ryan Ruskamp, Ben Neely, Josh Gonsoir, Ken Hatten, Dave Adams, Thad Hueneman, Sam Stukel, Jason Kral, Steve LaBay and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for assistance with sample collection, Steve Krentz for providing stocking records and Patty Crandel for providing comments on this manuscript. The findings and conclusions in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeHaan, P.W., Jordan, G.R. & Ardren, W.R. Use of genetic tags to identify captive-bred pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) in the wild: improving abundance estimates for an endangered species. Conserv Genet 9, 691–697 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9374-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9374-3