Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1339–1353 | Cite as

A rangewide population genetic study of trumpeter swans

  • S. J. Oyler-McCanceEmail author
  • F. A. Ransler
  • L. K. Berkman
  • T. W. Quinn
Research Article

Abstract

For management purposes, the range of naturally occurring trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator) has been divided into two populations, the Pacific Coast Population (PP) and the Rocky Mountain Population (RMP). Little is known about the distribution of genetic variation across the species’ range despite increasing pressure to make difficult management decisions regarding the two populations and flocks within them. To address this issue, we used rapidly evolving genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA sequence and 17 nuclear microsatellite loci) to elucidate the underlying genetic structure of the species. Data from both markers revealed a significant difference between the PP and RMP with the Yukon Territory as a likely area of overlap. Additionally, we found that the two populations have somewhat similar levels of genetic diversity (PP is slightly higher) suggesting that the PP underwent a population bottleneck similar to a well-documented one in the RMP. Both genetic structure and diversity results reveal that the Tri-State flock, a suspected unique, non-migratory flock, is not genetically different from the Canadian flock of the RMP and need not be treated as a unique population from a genetic standpoint. Finally, trumpeter swans appear to have much lower mitochondrial DNA variability than other waterfowl studied thus far which may suggest a previous, species-wide bottleneck.

Keywords

Trumpeter swan Cygnus buccinator Microsatellites mtDNA Gene flow Genetic diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many individuals helped make this study possible. Thanks to G. Beyersbergen, S. Comeau, B. Conant, C. Damberg, R. Drewien, K. Dubois, D. Duncan, L. Glass, L. Hanauska-Brown, J. Johnson, S. Kittlesen, M. Linck, B. Long, N. Lyman, E. Malleck, T. McEneaney, S. Patla, M. Petrula, R. Shea, S. Rickenbaugh, J. Morton, L. Jowziak, C. Mitchell, T. Rothe, M. and Vrtiska for collecting samples. We thank A. Breault, R. Oates, R. Trost, and M. Vrtiska for coordinating collection of samples in their regions. J. St. John was integral to this project in countless ways including isolating the microsatellites, offering technical expertise, and graciously reading several drafts of this report. We would also like to thank H-P. Liu, J. Dubovsky, J. Cornely, and G. Ransler for providing editorial comments and constructive criticism on this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program and the U. S. Geological Survey through its Science Support Program.

References

  1. Alison RM (1975) Some previously unpublished historical records of trumpeter swans in Ontario. Can Field Nat 89:311–313Google Scholar
  2. Banko WE (1960) The trumpeter swan: its history, habits, and populations in the United States. North American Fauna. No. 63., U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C., USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett VA, Vyse ER (1982) Comparative genetics of three trumpeter swan populations. Auk 99:103–108Google Scholar
  4. Bellrose FC (1976) Ducks, geese and swans of North America. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowcock AM, Ruizlinares A, Tomfohrde J et al (1994) High-resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carew PJ, Adcock GJ, Mulder RA (2003) Microsatellite loci for paternity assessment in the black swan (Cygnus atratus: Aves). Mol Ecol Notes 3:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Human Genetics 19:233–257Google Scholar
  8. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke F, MacInnes CD, Prevett JP (1975) Gene flow between breeding populations of lesser snow geese. Auk 92:493–510Google Scholar
  10. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Desjardins P, Morais R (1990) Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates J Mol Biol 212:599–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engelhardt KA, Kadlec MJA, Roy VL, Powell JA (2000) Evaluation of translocation criteria: case study with trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator). Biol Conserv 94:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes – application to human mitochondrial-DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP – phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166Google Scholar
  16. Guo S, Thompson E (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goudet J (1995) F-STAT version 1–2: a computer program to calculate F-statistic. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  18. Haig SM (1998) Molecular contributions to conservation. Ecology 79:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen HA (1973) Trumpeter swan management. Wildfowl 24:27–32Google Scholar
  20. James ML (2000) Status of the trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator) in Alberta. Alberta Wildlife Status Report. I. M. G. M. D. R. C. Prescott. Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahn NW, St. John J, Quinn TW (1998) Chromosome-specific intron size differences in the avian CHD gene provide an efficient method for sex identification in birds. Auk 115:1074–1078Google Scholar
  22. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez JV, Yuhki N, Masuda R, Modi W, O’Brien SJ (1994) Numt, a recent transfer and tandem amplification of mitochondrial-DNA to the nuclear genome of the domestic cat. J Mol Evol 39:174–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. MacKay RH (1981) The trumpeter swan – an endangered species in Canada. Proceedings and Papers of the Ninth Trumpeter Swan Society Conference, 22–23Google Scholar
  25. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsolais JV, White BN (1997) Genetic considerations for the reintroduction of trumpeter swans to Ontario. North Am Swans 26:18–22Google Scholar
  27. Matteson S, Craven S, Compton D (1995) The trumpeter swan. University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension: 8, Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Meng A, Carter RE, Parkin DT (1990) The variability of DNA fingerprints in 3 species of swan. Hered 64:73–80Google Scholar
  29. Minch E, Ruiz-Linares A, Goldstein D, Feldman M, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1995) Microsat (Version 1.4d): a computer program for calculating various statistics on microsatellite allele data <http://hpgl.stanford.edu/projects/microsat/≥Google Scholar
  30. Moser TJ (2006) The 2005 North American trumpeter swan survey. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, Denver, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. O’ Brien SJ, Evermann JF (1988) Interactive influence of infectious disease on genetic diversity of natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 3:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oyler-McCance SJ, St. John J, Taylor SE, Apa AD, Quinn TW (2005) Population genetics of Gunnison sage-grouse: implications for management. J Wildl Manage 69:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pelizza CA, Britten HB (2002) Isozyme analysis reveals genetic differences between three trumpeter swan populations. Waterbirds 25:355–359Google Scholar
  36. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Quattro JM, Vrijenhoek RC (1989) Fitness differences among remnant populations of the endangered topminnow. Science 245:976–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinn TW, Wilson AC (1993) Sequence evolution in and around the mitochondrial control region in birds. J Mol Evol 37:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  41. Roukonen M, Kvist L, Aarvak T, Markkola J, Morozov VM, Øien IJ, Syroechkovsky EE, Tolvanen P, Lumme J (2004) Population genetic structure and conservation of the lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus. Conserv Genetics 5:501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN: software for population genetics data analysis Version 2.000. University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  43. Scribner KT, Petersen MR, Fields RL et al (2001) Sex-biased gene flow in spectacled eiders (Anatidae): inferences from molecular markers with contrasting modes of inheritance. Evolution 55:2105–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shea RE, Nelson HK, Gillette LN, King JG, Weaver DK (2002) Restoration of trumpeter swans in North America: a century of progress and challenges. Waterbirds 25:296–300Google Scholar
  45. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple-regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel Test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zool 35:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sorenson MD, Quinn TW (1998) Numts: a challenge for avian systematics and population biology. Auk 115:214–221Google Scholar
  47. St. John J, Ransler F, Quinn TW, Oyler-McCance SJ. 2006. Characterization of microsatellite loci isolated in trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator). Mol Ecol Notes 6:1083–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP* 4.0 Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, USAGoogle Scholar
  49. Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Talbot SL, Pearce JM, Pierson BJ, Derksen DV, Scribner KT (2003) Molecular status of the dusky Canada goose (Branta canadensis occidentalis): a genetic assessment of a translocation effort. Conserv Genet 4:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred form restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III Cladogram Estimation Genetics 132:619–633Google Scholar
  52. Thalmann O, Hebler J, Poinar HN, Paabo S, Vigilant L (2004) Unreliable mtDNA data due to nuclear insertions: a cautionary tale from analysis of humans and other great apes. Mol Ecol 13:321–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tiedemann R, Von Kistowski KG, Noer H (1999) On sex-specific dispersal and mating tactics in the common eider Somateria mollissima as inferred from the genetic structure of breeding colonies. Behavior 136:1145–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Trumpeter swan survey of the Rocky Mountain Population – Winter 2006. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Birds and State Programs, Lakewood, USAGoogle Scholar
  55. Wayne RK, Lehman N, Girman D et al (1991) Conservation genetics of the endangered Isle-Royale gray wolf. Conserv Biol 5:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Oyler-McCance
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • F. A. Ransler
    • 2
  • L. K. Berkman
    • 2
  • T. W. Quinn
    • 2
  1. 1.U. S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science CenterFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Rocky Mountain Center for Conservation Genetics and Systematics, Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations