Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A PCR-RFLP method on faecal samples to distinguish Martes martes, Martes foina, Mustela putorius and Vulpes vulpes

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A non-invasive genetic approach has been recently employed in the population genetics of wild species, using faeces that could be easily collected, particularly of elusive or endangered species. However, faeces of pine (Martes martes) and beech marten (M. foina) can be morphologically similar and could be confused with those of polecat (Mustela putorius) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes). On this basis, a rapid, simple and inexpensive RFLP protocol using a cytochrome b (Cyt b) gene fragment of mtDNA, isolated from faecal samples, was performed to distinguish the above-mentioned species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birks JDS, Messenger JE, Braithwaite AC et al (2004) Are scat survey a reliable method for assessing distribution and population status of pine marten? In: Martens and fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments: an international perspective. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 235–252

  • Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen P et al (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan JC, Archie EA, Van Horn RC et al (2005) Locus effects and sources of error in non-invasive genotyping. Mol Ecol Notes 5:680–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colli L, Cannas R, Deiana AM et al (2005) Identification of mustelids (Carnivora: Mustelidae) by mitochondrial DNA markers. Mamm Biol 70:384–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison A, Birks JDS, Brooks RC et al (2002) On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats. J Zool 257:141–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment briefings. Bioinformatics 5:150–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle CJ, Davison A, Strobeck C (2003) Genetic structure of European pine martens (Martes martes), and evidence for introgression with M. americana in England. Conserv Genet 4:179–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucentini L, Caporali S, Palomba A et al (2006a) A comparison of conservative DNA extraction methods from fins and scales of freshwater fish: a useful tool for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9137-6

  • Lucentini L, Palomba A, Lancioni H, Natali M, Panara F (2006b) A non-destructive, rapid, reliable and inexpensive method to sample, store and extract high-quality DNA from fish body mucus and buccal cells. Mol Ecol Notes 6:257–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata J, Aramilev VV, Belozor A et al (2005) Fecal genetic analysis using PCR-RFLP of cytochrome b to identify sympatric carnivores, the tiger Panthera tigris and the leopard Panthera pardus, in far eastern Russia. Conserv Genet 6:863–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W et al (1999) The Atlas of European mammals. T and AD Poyser Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle AE, Pilgrim KL, Mills LS et al (2003) Identification of mustelids using mitochondrial DNA and non-invasive sampling. Conserv Genet 4:241–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura M (2005) Individual sexing and genotyping from blood spots on the snow: a reliable source of DNA for non-invasive genetic surveys. Conserv Genet 6:871–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Waits LP, Luikart G (1999) Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends Ecol Evol 14:323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vercillo F, Lucentini L, Mucci N, Ragni B, Randi E, Panara F (2004) A simple and rapid PCR-RFLP method to distinguishing Martes martes and Martes foina. Conserv Genet 5:869–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to A. Vignati for critically reading the English manuscript. This work was partly supported by grants of University of Perugia and Regione dell’Umbria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucentini Livia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livia, L., Francesca, V., Antonella, P. et al. A PCR-RFLP method on faecal samples to distinguish Martes martes, Martes foina, Mustela putorius and Vulpes vulpes . Conserv Genet 8, 757–759 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9203-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9203-0

Keywords

Navigation