Skip to main content

Conservation genetics and species status of an endangered Australian dragon, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla (Reptilia: Agamidae)

Conservation Genetics volume 8, pages 185–195 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

We present a phylogenetic and morphological study of the grassland earless dragon, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla, an endangered habitat specialist that occurs in a few isolated populations in eastern Australia. Tympanocryptis pinguicolla occurred historically in Victoria in south-eastern Australia, but has not been seen since 1990, and current populations are known in New South Wales and Canberra in south-eastern Australia. Recently, new populations identified as T. pinguicolla were discovered on the Darling Downs, Queensland. Translocation of individuals between these populations has been suggested as a conservation management strategy to maintain genetic diversity. To address this issue, we undertook a phylogenetic study of all major populations of T. pinguicolla using a 1838 bp region of mitochondrial DNA, incorporating ND1, ND2, COI and eight tRNA genes. We incorporated specialized degraded-DNA techniques to amplify DNA from historical museum specimens, as no extant tissue was available for Victorian populations. Our results, which include morphological analysis, provide convincing evidence that populations currently identified as T.␣pinguicolla do not comprise a monophyletic species, as the populations from the Darling Downs are more closely related to T. tetraporophora than to T. pinguicolla. In addition, we find that there is a significant level of haplotype divergence between populations of T. pinguicolla, indicating that these lineages separated at least 1.5 mya. Our results suggest translocation may not be an appropriate management strategy and our findings that Darling Downs populations are not T.␣pinguicolla will significantly influence the conservation management of this species in Queensland.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Austin JJ, Ross AJ, Smith AB, Fortey RA, Thomas RH (1997a) Problems of reproducibility – does geologically ancient DNA survive in amber preserved insects? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:467–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin JJ, Smith AB, Thomas RH (1997b) Palaeontology in a molecular world: the search for authentic ancient DNA. Trends Ecol Evol 12:303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler JM (1982) Aridity in the late tertiary and quaternary of Australia. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia. Peacock Publications, Adelaide, pp 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76:1967–1971

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA, Hardy CM (2005) Dispersal and phylogeography of the agamid lizard Amphibolurus nobbi in fragmented and continuous habitat. Mol Ecol 14:1613–1629

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frood D, Calder M (1987) Nature conservation in Victoria. Study Report Vols 1 and 2. Victorian National Parks Association, Victoria

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson R (2002) Vertebrate fauna survey of remnant native grasslands of the eastern Darling Downs. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw AP, Martin HA, McEwen Mason JRC (1994) The Neogene – a period of transition. In: Hill RS (ed) Australian vegetation history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaché AD, Reeder TW (2002) Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst Biol 51:44–68

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt ID (1995) European management of remnant grassy forests and woodlands in south-eastern Australia – past, present and future? Vic Nat 112:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Fang Z, Papenfuss TJ (1997a) Two novel gene orders and the role of light-strand replication in rearrangement of the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Mol Biol Evol 14:91–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Papenfuss TJ (1997b) Replication slippage may cause parallel evolution in the secondary structures of mitochondrial transfer RNAs. Mol Biol Evol 14:30–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macey JR, Schulte II JA, Larson A, Fang Z, Wang Y, Tuniyev BS, Papenfuss TJ (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of toads in the Bufo bufo species group from the eastern escarpment of the Tibetan Plateau: a case of vicariance and dispersal. Mol Phyl Evol 9:80–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macey JR, Wang Y, Ananjeva NB, Larson A, Papenfuss TJ (1999) Vicariant patterns of fragmentation among gekkonid␣lizards of the genus Teratoscincus produced by the Indian collision: a molecular phylogenetic perspective and an area cladogram for Central Asia. Mol Phyl Evol 12:320–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR (1992) MacClade, analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. Sinauer Assoc., Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville J, Schulte JA II, Larson A (2001) A molecular phylogenetic study of ecological diversification in the Australian lizard genus Ctenophorus. J Exp Zool 291:339–353

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol 51:238–254

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls JA, Double MC, Rowell DM and Magrath RD (2000) The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). J Avian Biol 31:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson P, Cooper P (2000) Recovery plan for the grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla). Unpublished report to Environment Australia, Canberra. Available: http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/earless-dragon/pubs/grassland-earless-dragon.pdf

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte JA II, Melville J, Larson A (2003) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for ancient divergence of lizard taxa on either side of Wallace’s Line. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott IAW, Keogh JS (2000) Conservation genetics of the endangered grassland earless dragon Tympanocryptis pinguicolla (Reptilia: Agamidae) in Southeastern Australia. Con Gen 1:357–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WJS, Osborne WS, Donnellan SC, Cooper PD (1999) The systematic status of earless dragon lizards Tympanocryptis (Reptilia: Agamidae) in south-eastern Australia. Aust J␣Zool 47:551–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr CR, Leung, LK-P (2005) Habitat use by the Darling Downs population of the grassland earless dragon: implications for conservation. J Wild Man (in press)

  • Stuwe J (1986) An assessment of the conservation status of native grasslands on the Western Plains, Victoria, and Sites of Significance: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 48. Department of Conservation, Forests & Lands, Victoria

  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Beta Version 4.0b10a. Sinauer Assoc., Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend T, Larson A (2002) Molecular phylogenetics and mitochondrial genomic evolution in the Chamaeleonidae (Reptilia, Squamata). Mol Phyl Evol 23:22–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisrock DW, Macey JR, Ugurtas IH, Larson A, Papenfuss TJ (2001) Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography among salamandrids of the “true” salamander clade: rapid branching of numerous highly divergent lineages in Mertensiella luschani associated with the rise of Anatolia. Mol Phyl Evol 18:434–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, George M Jr, Gyllensten UB, Helm-Bychowski K, Higuchi RC, Palumbi SR, Prager EM, Sage RD, Stoneking M (1985) Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol J Linn Soc 26:375–400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank P. Couper, L. Leung and R. Sadlier for advice on T. pinguicolla, K. Bell for input into morphological analyses and R. Rose, V. White & B. Ong for assistance in the molecular laboratory. Funding was provided by Australian Academy of Sciences to JM and the Australian Research Council to JM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sciences, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia

    Jane Melville & Jeremy J. Austin

  2. School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia

    Stephanie Goebel

  3. School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia

    Carly Starr

  4. School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2000, Australia

    J. Scott Keogh

  5. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    Jeremy J. Austin

Authors
  1. Jane Melville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanie Goebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carly Starr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Scott Keogh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jeremy J. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Melville.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Samples for DNA sequencing

Museum or field collection numbers and localities of specimens from which DNA was extracted are provided below (NOTE: GenBank accession numbers will be provided after paper is accepted for publication). All listed specimens designated by a field collection number where tail tips or toes clips collected during field surveys by Environment Australia (designated by “C”, “W”, or “M”) or C. Starr (designated by “CS”). Museum acronyms are AM for the Australian Museum, Sydney, and NMV for Museum Victoria, Melbourne. Tympanocryptis tetraporaphora: GenBank#DQ529271, AMR163347, northern NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529254, C1, Kuma Nature Reserve, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529255, C11, Devereanux, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529256, C12, Devereanux, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529257, C2,␣Devereanux, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529258, C3, Quartz Hill, Cooma, NSW; T.␣pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529259, C6, Kuma, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529260, C8, Kuma, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529261, C9,␣Quartz Hill, Cooma, NSW; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529262, W3, Woden, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529263, M2, Majura Firing Range, N Canberra Airport, Australian Capital Territory; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529265, CS1, Mount Tyson, Halford, Queensland; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529266, CS14, Mount Tyson, Halford, Queensland; T.␣pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529268, CS10, Mount Tyson, Halford, Queensland; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529267, CS33, Bongeen, Woodridge, Queensland; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529269, CS41, Bongeen, Woodridge, Queensland; T.␣pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529270, CS46, Bongeen, Woodridge, Queensland; T. pinguicolla: GenBank#DQ529264, NMVD3483, mouth of the Yarra River, Melbourne, Victoria (specimen dates from 1906).

Our analyses also included the following previously published sequences (Melville et al. 2001; Schulte et al. 2003): Rankinia diemensis, AF375619; Pogona vitticeps, SAMA R42415, AY133026, Mabel Creek Station, South Australia; Tympanocryptis centralis, SAMA R31761, AY133030 208 km E Pipilyatjarra, South Australia; Tympanocryptis cephalus, SAMA R22854, AY133027, 21 km N Roebourne, Western Australia; Tympanocryptis houstoni, WAM R119738, AY133028, 40 km W Mundrabilla Roadhouse, Western Australia; Tympanocryptis intima, SAMA R40665, AY133029, Moolawatana Homestead, South Australia; Tympanocryptis lineata, AF128475; Tympanocryptis pinguicolla, ANWC R5786, AY133031, Majura Firing Range, N Canberra Airport, Australian Capital Territory; Tympanocryptis tetraporophora, ANWC R5612, AY133032, Morella Station, 65 km NNW of Walgett, New South Wales.

Samples for morphological analysis

Museum acronyms are AM for the Australian Museum, Sydney, ANWC for the Australian Wildlife Collection CSIRO, Canberra, and QM for the Queensland Museum, Brisbane. Seven specimens were from the Darling Downs, QLD (Bongeen: QMJ81871, QMJ81870, QMJ81784, QMJ34744; Brookstead: QMJ82087, QMJ82088; Dalby: AMR16957) and eleven from Canberra/NSW (Bathurst NSW: AMR26077, AMR25980; Woden station, Canberra: ANWCR05656, ANWCR05657, ANWCR05658, ANWCR05789; and␣Canberra Airport ACT: ANWCR05659, ANWCR05785, ANWCR05786, ANWCR05787, ANWCR05788).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melville, J., Goebel, S., Starr, C. et al. Conservation genetics and species status of an endangered Australian dragon, Tympanocryptis pinguicolla (Reptilia: Agamidae). Conserv Genet 8, 185–195 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9161-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9161-6

Keywords

  • Agamidae
  • Genetic diversity
  • Haplotype divergence
  • Historical biogeography
  • Reptiles