Skip to main content

Reduced genetic diversity and significant genetic differentiation after translocation: Comparison of the remnant and translocated populations of bridled nailtail wallabies (Onychogalea fraenata)

Conservation Genetics volume 7, pages 577–589 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Loss of genetic diversity and increased population differentiation from source populations are common problems associated with translocation programmes established from captive-bred stock or a small number of founders. The bridled nailtail wallaby is one of the most endangered macropods in Australia, having been reduced to a single remnant population in the last 100 years. A translocated population of bridled nailtail wallabies was established using animals sourced directly from the remnant population (wild-released) as well as the progeny of animals collected for a captive breeding programme (captive-bred). The aims of this study were to compare genetic diversity among released animals and their wild-born progeny to genetic diversity observed in the remnant population, and to monitor changes in genetic diversity over time as more animals were released into the population. Heterozygosity did not differ between the translocated and remnant population; however, allelic diversity was significantly reduced across all released animals and their wild-born progeny. Animals bred in captivity and their wild-born progeny were also significantly differentiated from the source population after just four generations. Wild-released animals, however, were representative of the source population and several alleles were unique to this group. Both heterozygosity and allelic diversity among translocated animals decreased over time with the additional release of captive-bred animals, as no new genetic stock was added to the population. Captive breeding programmes can provide large numbers of animals for release, but this study highlights the importance of sourcing animals directly from remnant populations in order to maintain genetic diversity and minimise genetic drift.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Ballou J, Ralls K (1982) Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates – a detailed analysis. Biol. Conserv. 24: 239–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodkin JL, Ballachey BE, Cronin MA, Scribner KT (1999) Population demographics and genetic diversity in remnant and translocated populations of sea otters. Conserv. Biol. 13: 1378–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001–2014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Honeycutt RL, Rooney AP, Gonzales RA, Gee KL (2003) Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Mol. Ecol. 12: 3237–3252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenhard T (1995) Conservation breeding as a tool for saving animal species from extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 438–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge MDB, King JM, Loupis AK, Spencer PBS, Taylor AC, Pope LC, Hall GP (1999) Unprecedented low levels of genetic variation and inbreeding depression in an island population of the black-footed rock-wallaby. Conserv. Biol. 13: 531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol. Conserv. 96: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes SH, Hogg JT, Buchanan FC, Crawford AM, Allendorf FW (1995) Microsatellite evolution in congeneric mammals - domestic and bighorn sheep. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 1106–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 305–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1500–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight KF, Queller DC, Poznansky T (1998) KINSHIP (version 1.3.1). Goodnight Software. Available at http://www.gsoftnet.us/GSoft.html

  • Goossens B, Funk SM, Vidal C, Latour S, Jamart A, Ancrenaz M, Wickings EJ, Tutin CEG, Bruford MW (2002) Measuring genetic diversity in translocation programmes: Principles and application to a chimpanzee release project. Anim. Conserv. 5: 225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G, Lawrie BC (1980) The rediscovery of the bridled nail-tailed wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata (Gould) (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) in Queensland. Aust. Wildl. Res. 7: 339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995)

  • Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool – status and strategy. Science 245: 477–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Miller PS (1992) Conservation genetics – techniques and fundamentals. Ecol. Appl. 2: 30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Miller PS, Geffen E, Wayne R (1997) Genetic evaluation of the three captive Mexican wolf lineages. Zoo Biol. 16: 47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikz JK, Johnson PM (1999) Development of the bridled nailtail wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata, and age estimation of the pouch young. Wildl. Res. 26: 239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood GM (2003) PopTools version 2.5.9. Available at http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools

  • Houlden BA, England PR, Taylor AC, Greville WD, Sherwin WB (1996) Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south-eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Mol. Ecol. 5: 269–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PM (1997) Reproduction in the bridled nailtail wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata Gould (Marsupialia: Macropodidae), in captivity. Wildl. Res. 24: 411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laikre L, Ryman N (1991) Inbreeding depression in a captive wolf (Canis lupus) population. Conserv. Biol. 5: 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson S, Jameson R, Bodkin J, Staedler M, Bentzen P (2002) Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J. Mamm. 83: 893–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundie-Jenkins G (2002). Recovery Plan for the Bridled Nailtail Wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata) 1997–2001. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Shine R, Olsson M, Wittzell H (1999) Restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 402: 34–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maudet C, Miller C, Bassano B, Breitenmoser-Wursten C, Gauthier D, Obexer-Ruff G, Michallet J, Taberlet P, Luikart G (2002) Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wildlife conservation management: applications in Alpine ibex [Capra ibex (ibex)]. Mol. Ecol. 11: 421–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130: 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polziehn RO, Hamr J, Mallory FF, Strobeck C (2000) Microsatellite analysis of North American wapiti (Cervus elaphus) populations. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1561–1576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pope LC, Sharp A, Moritz C (1996) Population structure of the yellow-footed rock-wallaby Petrogale xanthopus (Gray, 1854) inferred from mtDNA sequences and microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 5: 629–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pople AR, Lowry J, Lundie-Jenkins G, Clancy TF, McCallum HI, Sigg D, Hoolihan D, Hamilton S (2001) Demography of bridled nailtail wallabies translocated to the edge of their former range from captive and wild stock. Biol. Conserv. 102: 285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Ballou J (1986) Captive breeding programs for populations with a small number of founders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1: 19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Ballou J, Templeton A (1988) Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conserv. Biol. 2: 185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrazin F, Barbault R (1996) Reintroduction: Challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 474–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PJ (1999) Persistence without intervention: assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Short J, Smith A (1994) Mammal decline and recovery in Australia. J. Mamm. 75: 288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short J, Bradshaw SD, Giles J, Prince RIT, Wilson GR (1992) Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia, Macropodoidea) in Australia - a review. Biol. Conserv. 62: 189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigg DP (2005) Population genetics and mating system in the single remnant and translocated population of the endangered bridled nailtail wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata. Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane

  • Sigg DP, Goldizen AW, Pople AR (2005) The importance of mating system in translocation programs: reproductive success of released male bridled nailtail wallabies. Biol. Conserv. 123: 289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Derrickson SR, Beissinger SR, Wiley JW, Smith TB, Toone WD, Miller B (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv. Biol. 10: 338–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1517–1528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell CA, Mulvey M, Vinyard GL (1996) Translocations and the preservation of allelic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1133–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernesi C, Crestanello B, Pecchioli E, Tartari D, Caramelli D, Hauffe H, Bertorelle G (2003) The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): A microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 12: 585–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson CM, Johnston PG, Rodger KA, McKenzie LM, Waugh O’Neill RJ, Cooper DW (1997) SRY and karyotypic status of one abnormal and two intersexual marsupials. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 9: 233–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-Statistics for the Analysis of Population-Structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, Esker TL, Jansen RW, Walk JW, Kershner EL, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (1998) Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282: 1695–1698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse AM, Harley EH (2001) Post-bottleneck genetic diversity of elephant populations in South Africa, revealed using microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2139–2149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RN, Rhodes OE, Serfass TL (2000) Assessment of genetic variance among source and reintroduced fisher populations. J. Mamm. 81: 895–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf CM, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple SA (1996) Avian and mammalian translocations: Update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1142–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh FC, Yang R-C, Boyle T, Ye Z-H, Mao JX (1997) POPGENE, the User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger KR, Richardson BJ, Vachot-Griffin AM (2003) A rapid population expansion retains genetic diversity within European rabbits in Australia. Mol. Ecol. 12: 789–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Queensland Parks and Wildlife staff, the Bridled Nailtail Wallaby Recovery Team, and volunteers who assisted with data collection, in particular Col and Maureen Morgan, Janelle Lowry, Geoff Lundie-Jenkins and Sheryl and Alan Hamilton. I thank Anne Goldizen, Andy Lowe, Craig Moritz, Stephanie Hazlitt, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that improved the manuscript. I also thank Craig Moritz for overall project support and in particular for help with genetic lab work. This project was funded by a Queensland Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant, with additional funding from the Australian Research Council. This project was covered by an EPA Scientific Purposes Permit and clearance from the University of Queensland’s Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Integrative Biology and The Ecology Centre, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Dominique P. Sigg

Authors
  1. Dominique P. Sigg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique P. Sigg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigg, D. Reduced genetic diversity and significant genetic differentiation after translocation: Comparison of the remnant and translocated populations of bridled nailtail wallabies (Onychogalea fraenata). Conserv Genet 7, 577–589 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9096-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9096-3

Keywords

  • bridled nailtail wallaby
  • conservation
  • microsatellite
  • population genetics
  • translocation