Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conservation corridors affect the fixation of novel alleles

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corridors are a popular tool for conservation of small populations. However, two purported benefits of corridors, increasing gene flow and providing a means for the recolonization of extinct patches of habitat (population rescue), may have unappreciated impacts on the likelihood that a new allele will become incorporated (fixed) within a population. Using a simulation model, I demonstrate that connecting a stable, isolated population with a population that requires periodic rescue (due to extinction via natural or anthropogenic disturbance) can affect fixation of alleles in the stable population, largely by changing the effective population size Ne of the two-patch complex. When disturbance is rare, connecting the two patches with corridors can increase fixation of beneficial alleles and increase loss of harmful alleles. However, the opposite occurs when rates of disturbance are high: corridors can promote fixation of harmful alleles and reduce fixation of beneficial alleles. Because the impact of corridors hinges upon disturbance frequency (i.e. rate of population rescue), population growth rate, movement rates, and habitat quality, different species are likely to have different responses to corridor-mediated fixation, even if the species reside within the same ecological community. By changing fixation, corridors could thus either promote adaptation or extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RR (1978) The Evolutional Ecology of Animal Migration. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blueweiss L, Fox H, Kudzma V, Nakashima D, Peters R, Sams S (1978) Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 37: 257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne DR, Bowers MA (2004) Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a review. Land. Ecol. 19: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Ann. Rev. Genetics 29: 305–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Bowne DR, Cunningham A, Danielson BJ, Levey DJ, Sargent S, Spira T (2003) Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84: 609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1927) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. V. Selection and mutation. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 23: 838–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47: 713–719

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Conery J, Bürger R. (1995) Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama T (1970) On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 15: 221–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mech SG, Hallett JG (2001) Evaluating the effectiveness of corridors: a genetic approach. Cons. Biol. 15: 467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto SP, Whitlock MC (1997) The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics 146: 723–733

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DK, Noon BR, Meslow EC (1997) Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. Bioscience 47: 677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 12923–12926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (2003) Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164: 767–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC, Barton NH (1997) The effective size of a metapopulation. Genetics 146: 427–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

B. Danielson, M. Whitlock, F. Janzen, J. Nason, T. Kawecki, D. Coltman, E. Damschen, D. Adams, R. Dyer, N. Haddad, and the ELVIS labgroup at Iowa State University provided insightful discussion and comments on previous drafts of the manuscript. Financial support provided by the Ecology and Evolutionary Interdepartmental Graduate Program at ISU, the National Science Foundation, and a Science to Achieve Results Fellowship from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Portions of this work were conducted while a Postdoctoral Associate at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a Center funded by NSF (Grant #DEB-0072909), the University of California, and the Santa Barbara campus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John L. Orrock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orrock, J.L. Conservation corridors affect the fixation of novel alleles. Conserv Genet 6, 623–630 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9016-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9016-6

Keywords

Navigation