Abstract
Gene flow among historically isolated populations is expected to increase genetic diversity and consequently the ability of populations to adapt to environmental changes. Few experimental studies, however, have examined the relationship between gene flow and the adaptive potential of populations. The increase in adaptive potential that occurs as a result of gene flow is expected to depend on the genetic variance among populations that undergo genetic exchange. In the present study, we compared observed and expected changes in adaptive potential (as measured by the selection response of sternopleural bristle number) that occur as a result of gene flow among experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We examined the effect of limited immigration (m = 0.05 over 3 generations) among a set of experimentally isolated lineages, in addition to the effect of complete hybridization among lineages. As expected, we found that limited immigration and hybridization both yielded increases in adaptive potential. However, whereas the effect of limited immigration agreed well with theoretical expectations, the increase in adaptive potential following complete hybridization of lineages was significantly less than expected. We discuss these findings in relation to endangered species conservation efforts, particularly with respect to the goal of maximizing the retention of adaptive potential within managed populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
FW Allendorf (1986) ArticleTitleGenetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol. 5 181–190 Occurrence Handle10.1002/zoo.1430050212
KD Atkins R Thompson (1986) ArticleTitlePredicted and realized responses to selection for an index of bone length and body weight in scottish blackface sheep. I. Responses in the index and component traits Anim. Prod. 43 421–435
SJ Ball M Adams HP Possingham MA Keller (2000) ArticleTitleThe genetic contribution of single male immigrants to small, inbred populations: A laboratory study using Drosophila melanogaster Heredity 84 677–684 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00721.x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsVSisLk%3D Occurrence Handle10886383
WJ Boecklen (1986) ArticleTitleOptimal design of nature reserves: consequences of genetic drift. Biol. Conserv. 38 323–338 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(86)90058-3
EH Bryant VL Backus ME Clark DH Reed (1999) ArticleTitleExperimental tests of captive breeding for endangered species Conserv. Biol. 13 1487–1496
R Burger M Lynch (1995) ArticleTitleEvolution and extinction in a changing environment – a quantitative-genetic analysis Evolution 49 151–163
P Buri (1956) ArticleTitleGene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila Evolution 10 367–402
MG Bulmer (1985) The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics Clarendon Press Oxford
JM Cheverud TT Vaughn LS Pletscher K King-Ellison J Bailiff E Adams C Erickson A Bonislawski (1999) ArticleTitleEpistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variance in populations that pass through a bottleneck Evolution 53 1009–1018
JF Crow NE Morton (1955) ArticleTitleMeasurement of gene frequency drift in small populations Evolution 9 202–214
D Ebert C Haag M Kirkpatrick M Riek JW Hottinger VI Pajunen (2002) ArticleTitleA selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation Science 295 IssueID5554 485–488 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1067485 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvFWgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11799241
NG Ehiobu ME Goddard JF Taylor (1989) ArticleTitleEffect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster Theor. Appl. Genet. 77 123–127
DS Falconer TFC Mackay (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics EditionNumber4 Longman Harlow, UK
J Felsenstein (1971) ArticleTitleInbreeding and variance effective numbers in populations with overlapping generations Genetics 68 581–597 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS2D2cvnsVE%3D Occurrence Handle5166069
RA Fisher (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Clarendon Press Oxford
O Flagstad CW Walker C Vila AK Sundqvist B Fernholm AK Hufthammer O Wiig I Koyola H Ellegren (2003) ArticleTitleTwo centuries of the scandinavian wolf population: Patterns of genetic variability and migration during an era of dramatic decline Mol. Ecol. 12 IssueID4 869–880 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01784.x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtl2mtro%3D Occurrence Handle12753208
R Frankham JD Ballou DA Briscoe (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
IR Franklin (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations ME Soulé BA Wilcox (Eds) Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective Sinauer Sunderland, MA 135–150
IR Franklin R Frankham (1998) ArticleTitleHow large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential Anim. Conserv. 1 69–71 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1367943098211103
PA Fuerst T Maruyama (1986) ArticleTitleConsiderations on the conservation of alleles and of genic heterozygosity in small managed populations Zoo Biol. 5 171–179 Occurrence Handle10.1002/zoo.1430050211
CJ Goodnight (1988) ArticleTitleEpistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42 441–454
Hoffman AA, Parsons PA (1991) Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press.
PK Ingvarsson (2001) ArticleTitleRestoration of genetic variation lost – the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 62–63 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02065-6 Occurrence Handle11165697
PK Ingvarsson MC Whitlock (2000) ArticleTitleHeterosis increases the effective migration rate Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 1321–1326 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2000.1145 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FntV2lsQ%3D%3D
CS Jones LR Noble JS Jones H Tegelstrom GS Triggs RJ Berry (1995) ArticleTitleDifferential male genetic success determines gene flow in an experimentally manipulated mouse population Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260 251–256 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA2Mjjs1A%3D
Kauffman B, Wool D (1992) Gene flow by immigrants into isolated recipient populations: A laboratory model using flour beetles. Genetica 85, 1992.
M Kimura (1955) ArticleTitleRandom genetic drift in multi-allelic locus. Evolution 9 419–435
SE Kerr S Wright (1954) ArticleTitleExperimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Forked Evolution 8 172–177
RC Lacy DB Lindenmayer (1995) ArticleTitleA simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus ogilby in south-eastern Australia. II. Loss of genetic variation within and between subpopulations Biol. Conserv. 73 131–142 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(95)91940-Y
R Lande (1992) ArticleTitleNeutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization Evolution 46 381–389
R Lande (1995) Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance JD Ballou M Gilpin TJ Foose (Eds) Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation Columbia University Press New York 318–340
R Lande GF Barrowclough (1987) Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management ME Soulé (Eds) Viable Populations for Conservation Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 87–123
M Lynch (1988) ArticleTitleThe rate of polygenic mutation. Genet. Res. 51 137–148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieA3Mzms1Y%3D Occurrence Handle3410317
M Lynch (1991) ArticleTitleThe genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45 622–629
M Lynch WG Hill (1986) ArticleTitlePhenotypic evolution by neutral mutation Evolution 40 915–935
T Maruyama (1970) ArticleTitleEffective number of alleles in a subdivided population. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 1 273–306 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSyB2Mzntl0%3D
DE McCauley MJ Wade (1981) ArticleTitleThe populational effects of inbreeding in Tribolium Heredity 46 59–67
D Newman DA Tallmon (2001) ArticleTitleExperimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations Conserv. Biol. 15 1054–1063 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041054.x
C Parmesan TL Root MR Willig (2000) ArticleTitleImpacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota B. Am. Meteor. Soc. 81 443–450
C Parmesan G Yohe (2003) ArticleTitleA globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems Nature 421 37–42 Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature01286 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXoslM%3D Occurrence Handle12511946
L Partridge (1988) ArticleTitleThe rare male effect – what is its evolutionary significance Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 319 IssueID1196 525–539 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD1Mbjt1c%3D
C Ray (2001) ArticleTitleMaintaining genetic diversity despite local extinctions: Effects of population scale Biol. Conserv. 100 3–14 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00202-0
A Robertson (1952) ArticleTitleThe effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37 189–207
RG Ruano LS Silvela C Lopez-Fanjul MA Toro (1996) ArticleTitleChanges in the additive variance of a fitness-related trait with inbreeding in Tribolium castaneum J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 113 93–97
IJ Saccheri PM Brakefield (2002) ArticleTitleRapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 IssueID1495 1073–1078 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2002.1963
ME Soulé (1987) Introduction ME Soulé (Eds) Viable Populations for Conservation Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 1–10
D Spielman R Frankham (1992) ArticleTitleModeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Improvement of reproductive fitness due to immigration of one individual into small partially inbred populations Zoo Biol. 11 343–351 Occurrence Handle10.1002/zoo.1430110506
DA Tallmon G Luikart RS Waples (2004) ArticleTitleThe alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 489–496 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.003
CD Thomas A Cameron RE Green M Bakkenes LJ Beaumont YC Collingham BFN Erasmus MF Siqueira Particlede A Grainger L Hannah L Hughes B Huntley AS Jaarsveld Particlevan GF Midgley L Miles MA Ortega-Huerta AT Peterson OL Phillips SE Williams (2004) ArticleTitleExtinction risk from climate change Nature 427 IssueID6970 145–148 Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature02121 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFOgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14712274
C Vila AK Sundqvist O Flagstad J Seddon S Bjornerfeldt I Kojola A Casulli H Sand P Wabakken H Ellegran (2002) ArticleTitleRescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf population by a single immigrant Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 IssueID1510 91–97
RS Waples (2002) Definition and estimation of effective population size in the conservation of endangered species SR Beissinger McCullough (Eds) Population Viability Analysis University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL 147–168
RL Westemeier JD Brawn SA Simpson TL Esker RW Jansen JW Walk EL Kershner JL Bouzat KN Paige (1998) ArticleTitleTracking the long term decline and recovery of an isolated population Science 282 1695–1698 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.282.5394.1695 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnslGgs7g%3D Occurrence Handle9831558
MC Whitlock PC Phillips MJ Wade (1993) ArticleTitleGene interaction affects the additive genetic variance in subdivided populations with migration and extinction Evolution 47 1758–1769
S Wright WE Kerr (1954) ArticleTitleExperimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small population’s of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Bar Evolution 8 225–240
S Wright (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. II. The Theory of Gene Frequencies University of Chicago Press Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swindell, W.R., Bouzat, J.L. Gene Flow and Adaptive Potential in Drosophila melanogaster. Conserv Genet 7, 79–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-8223-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-8223-5