Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 63–73 | Cite as

Effects of population size on genetic diversity and seed production in the rare Dictamnus albus(Rutaceae) in central Germany

  • Isabell HensenEmail author
  • Christoph Oberprieler
Article

Abstract

It is widely assumed that population size significantly affects the dynamics of plant populations. Smaller populations are threatened by genetic drift and inbreeding depression, both of which may result in a decrease of genetic variation and a resulting negative impact on plant fitness. In our study we analysed the patterns of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) variation among 10 Dictamnus albuspopulations of varying size. The aim was to examine local differentiation in relation to spatial isolation resulting from limited population size and geographical distancing between populations. Significant correlations were noted between population size and both percentage of polymorphic loci (P  < 0.01) and genetic diversity (P < 0.01). The matrix correlation between genetic and geographical distances revealed that geographical differentiation was reflected in the RAPD profile (Mantel test: r2=0.34, P < 0.001). We found the highest level of molecular variance of RAPD patterns among individuals within the populations (72.6%), whereas among-population variation accounted for only 21.6% of variation. These results were highly significant in that they indicated a restricted population differentiation, as would be expected from outcrossing species. An additional analysis of seed production showed that there was significant variation among populations in terms of mean seed number per flower and mean seed mass per population which could be attributed to differences in population size as well as levels of genetic variation.

Keywords

Dictamnus albus fitness fragmentation population-genetic structure RAPD-PCR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayres, DR, Ryan, FR 1999Genetic diversity and structure of the narrow endemic Wyethia reticulata and its congener W. bolanderi (Asteraceae) using RAPD and allozyme techniquesAm. J. Bot.86344353Google Scholar
  2. Baker, K, Richards, AJ, Tremayne, M 1994Fitness constraints on flower number, seed number and seed size in the dimorphic species Primula farinosa L. and Armeria maritima (Miller) WilldNew Phytol.128563570Google Scholar
  3. Bartish, IV, Jeppsson, N, Nybom, H 1999Population genetic structure in the dioecious pioneer plant species Hippophae rhamnoides investigated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markersMol. Ecol.8791802Google Scholar
  4. Benkert, D, Fukarek, F, Korsch, H 1996Verbreitungsatlas der Farn- und Bluetenpflanzen OstdeutschlandsFischerJenaGoogle Scholar
  5. Billington, HL 1991Effect of population size on genetic variation in a diocious coniferConserv. Biol.5115119Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, MS 1992Population viability analysisAnn. Rev. Ecol. Syst.23481506Google Scholar
  7. Byers, DL 1995Pollen quantity and quality as explanations for low seed set in small populations exemplified by Eupatorium (Asteraceae)Am. J Bot.8210001006Google Scholar
  8. Cardoso, MA, Provan, J, Powell, W, Ferreira, CG, Oliviera, DE 1998High genetic differentiation among remnant populations of the endangered Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae)Mol. Ecol.7601608Google Scholar
  9. Charlesworth, D, Charlesworth, B 1987Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequencesAnn. Rev. Ecol. Syst.18237268Google Scholar
  10. Couvet, D 2002Deleterious effects of restricted gene flow in fragmented populationsConserv. Biol.16369376Google Scholar
  11. Costin, BJ, Morgan, JW, Young, AG 2001Reproductive success does not decline in fragmented populations of Leucochrysum albicans subsp. albicans var. tricolor (Asteraceae)Biol. Conserv.98273284Google Scholar
  12. Dierschke, H 1974Saumgesellschaften im Vegetations- und Standortsgefaelle an WaldraendernScripta Geobot.61246Google Scholar
  13. Ellstram, NC, Elam, DR 1993Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservationAnn. Rev. Ecol. Syst.24217242Google Scholar
  14. Excoffier, L, Smouse, PE, Quattro, JM 1992Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction dataGenetics131479491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenner, M 1992Environmental influences on seed size and compositionFenner, M eds. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant CommunitiesCAB InternationalWallingford183213Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, M, Matthies, D 1997Mating structure and inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae)Am. J Bot.8416851692Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, M, Matthies, D 1998RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rare Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae)Am. J Bot.85811819Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, M, Husi, R, Prati, D, Peintinger, M, Kleunen, M, Schmid, B 2000RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plant Ranunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae)Am. J. Bot.8711281137Google Scholar
  19. Frank, D, Neumann, V 1999Bestandssituation der Pflanzen und Tiere Sachsen-AnhaltsUlmerStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  20. Frankham, R, Ballou, JD, Briscue, DA 2002Introduction to Conservation GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Franklin, IR 1980Evolutionary change in small populationsSoulé, MWilcox, B eds. Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological PerspectiveSinauerSunderland135149Google Scholar
  22. Frey, W 2000Life strategies as a basis for functional characterization of plant species and plant communities: A case studyZ. Oekol. Natursch.93541Google Scholar
  23. Gaudeul, M, Taberlet, P, Till-Bottraud, I 2000Genetic diversity in an endangered alpine plant, Eryngium alpinum (Apiaceae), inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markersMol. Ecol.916251637Google Scholar
  24. Godt, MJW, Hamrick, JL 1993Patterns and levels of pollen-mediated gene flow in Lathyrus latifoliusEvolution4798110Google Scholar
  25. Godt, MJW, Hamrick, JL, Bratton, S 1995Genetic diversity in a threatened wetland species, Helonias bullata (Liliaceae)Conserv. Biol.9596604Google Scholar
  26. Haeupler, H, Schoenfelder, P 1989Atlas der Farn- und Bluetenpflanzen der Bundesrepublik DeutschlandUlmerStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamrick, JL, Godt, MJW 1989Allozyme diversity in plant speciesBrown, AHDClegg, MTKahler, ALWeir, BS eds. Plant Population Genetics Breeding and Genetic ResourcesSinauerSunderland, MA, USA4363Google Scholar
  28. Hamrick, JL, Godt, MJW 1996Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant speciesPhil. Trans. Royal Soc. of London, Ser. B35112911298Google Scholar
  29. Jaeger, EJ, Johst, A, Lorenz, H 1997Wuchsform und Lebensgeschichte von Dictamnus albus L. (Rutaceae)Hercynia N.F.30217226Google Scholar
  30. Jennersten, O 1988Pollination of Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae), effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed setConserv. Biol.2359366Google Scholar
  31. Koeppel C, Rennwald E, Hirneisen N (1998) Rote Listen auf CD-ROM. Vol. 1: Mitteleuropa. V.I.M., Gaggenau/Germany. Google Scholar
  32. Kwak, MM, Velterop, O, Andel, J 1998Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitatsAppl. Veg. Sci.13754Google Scholar
  33. Lamont, BB, Klinkhamer, P, Witkowski, ET 1993Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii–a demonstration of the Allee effectOecologia94446450Google Scholar
  34. Leishman, MR, Wright, IJ, Moles, AT, Westoby, M 2000The evolutionary ecology of seed sizeFenner, M eds. Seeds. The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities2CABI PublishingWallingford, New York3157Google Scholar
  35. Lienert, J, Fischer, M 2004Experimental inbreeding reduces seed production and germination independent of fragmentation of populations of Swertia perennisBasic Appl. Ecol.,54352Google Scholar
  36. Loveless, MD, Hamrick, JL 1984Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populationsAnn. Rev. Ecol. Syst.156595Google Scholar
  37. Luijten, S, Dierick, A, Oostermeijer, G, Raimann, L, Nijs, H 2000Population size, genetic variation, and reproductive success in a rapidly declining, self-incompatible perennial (Arnica montana) in The NetherlandsConserv. Biol.1417761787Google Scholar
  38. Mantel, N 1967The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approachCanc. Res.27209212Google Scholar
  39. Menges, ES 1991Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie speciesConserv. Biol.5158165Google Scholar
  40. Milberg, P, Bertilsson, A 1997What determines seed set in Dracocephalum ruyshiana L., an endangered grassland plantFlora192361367Google Scholar
  41. Mills, LS, Allendorf, FW 1996The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and managementConserv. Biol.615091518Google Scholar
  42. Morgan, JW 1999Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plantConserv. Biol.13266273Google Scholar
  43. Nybom, H, Bartish, IV 2000Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plantsPersp. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst.393114Google Scholar
  44. Oostermeijer, JGB, Eijck, MW, Nijs, HCM 1994Offspring fitness in the relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant species Gentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae)Oecologia97289296Google Scholar
  45. Oostermeijer, JGB, Altenburg, RGM, Nijs, HCM 1995aEffects of outcrossing distance and selfing on fitness components in the rare Gentiana pneumonantheActa Bot. Neerl.44257268Google Scholar
  46. Oostermeijer, JGB, Eijck, MW, Leeuwen, NC, Nijs, HCM 1995bAnalysis of the relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and fitness in the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe LJ. Evol. Biol.8739757Google Scholar
  47. Oostermeijer, JGB, Luijten, SH, Krenov’, ZV, Nijs, HCM 1998Relations between population and habitat characteristics and reproduction of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe LConserv. Biol.1210421053Google Scholar
  48. Ouborg, NJ, Treuren, R 1995Variation in fitness-related characters among small and large populations of Salvia pratensisJ. Ecol.83369380Google Scholar
  49. Pott, R 1996Die Entwicklungsgeschichte und Verbreitung xerothermer Vegetationseinheiten in Mitteleuropa unter dem Einfluss des MenschenTuexenia16337369Google Scholar
  50. Primack, RB 1995NaturschutzbiologieSpektrum, HeidelbergBerlin, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Pullin, AS 2002Conservation BiologyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. QIAGEN (2000) DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and DNeasy Plant Maxi Kit Handbook. QIAGEN Distributors.Google Scholar
  53. Reed, DH, Frankham, R 2003Correlation between fitness and genetic diversityConserv. Biol.17230237Google Scholar
  54. Reynolds, J, Weir, BS, Cockerham, CC 1983Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short term genetic distanceGenetics105767779Google Scholar
  55. Saville, NM, Dramstad, WE, Fry, GLA, Corbet, SA 1997Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscapeAgric. Ecosystem. Env.17145154Google Scholar
  56. Schnittler, M, Guenther, KF 1999Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures–an analysis from national Red Lists and distribution mapsBiodiv. Conserv.8891925Google Scholar
  57. Schneider, S, Roesseli, D, Excoffier, L 2000ARLEQUIN, Version 2.000: A Software for Population Genetic Data AnalysisGenetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of GenevaSwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  58. Sebald, O, Seybold, S, Philippi, G 1992Die Farn- und Bluetenpflanzen Baden-Wuerttembergs (4. Spermatophyta, Rosidae, Halorogaceae-Apiaceae)UlmerStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  59. Shaffer, ML 1981Minimum population sizes for species conservationBioScience31131134Google Scholar
  60. Soulé, ME 1986Viable populations for conservationCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Steffan-Dewenter, I, Tscharntke, T 1999Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed setOecologia121432440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Treuren, R, Bijlsma, R, Ouborg, NJ, W, Delden 1991The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. I. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population sizeHeredity66181189Google Scholar
  63. Vergeer, P, Rengelink, R, Copal, A, Ouborg, NJ 2003The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensisJ.Ecol.911826Google Scholar
  64. Walther-Hellwig, K, Frankl, R 2000Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscapeJ. Appl. Entomol.124299306Google Scholar
  65. Wang, J 2004Application of the One-Migrant-per-Generation rule to conservation and managementConserv. Biol.18332343Google Scholar
  66. Wesserling, J, Tscharntke, T 1995Homing distances of bees and wasps and the fragmentation of habitatsMitt. Dtsch. Ges. Allg. Angew. Ent.10323326Google Scholar
  67. Westhus, W, Hengel, U 1995Biotope in Thueringen–Situation, Gefaehrdung und SchutzNaturschutzreport91255Google Scholar
  68. Wright, S 1931Evolution in Mendelians populationsGenetics1697259Google Scholar
  69. Wright, S 1951The genetical structure of populationsAnn. Eugen.15323354Google Scholar
  70. Young, A, Boyle, T, Brown, T 1996The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plantsTree11413418Google Scholar
  71. Zimmerman, M, Pyke, EH 1988Experimental manipulations of Polemonium foliosissimum: effects on subsequent nectar production, seed production, and growthJ. Ecol.76777789Google Scholar
  72. Zapata, TR, Arroyo, MTK 1978Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in VenezuelaBiotropica10221230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geobotany and Botanical GardenMartin-Luther University of Halle-WittenbergHalle/SaaleGermany
  2. 2.Institute of BotanyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburg

Personalised recommendations