Skip to main content
Log in

“We Need to State it Overtly”: MFT’s Rationales for Labeling SOCE and GICE as Unethical in the Code of Ethic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to explore the beliefs of marriage and family therapists (MFTs) about why sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE; i.e., conversion therapy) and gender identity change efforts (GICE) should be labeled as unethical in the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT) Code of Ethics. Utilizing an online survey, this study collected data from 208 clinicians with a range of therapeutic experiences and social location identities. Participants responded to open-ended questions, which were analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis revealed four themes describing why MFTs support GICE and SOCE being labeled as unethical in the AAMFT Code of Ethics: (1) Does not fit the values/roles of being an MFT; (2) Does not fit the ethics of being an MFT; (3) Is harmful and ineffective; and (4) AAMFT has an ethical imperative. Finally, a fifth theme emerged representing the responses from three participants who felt that SOCE and GICE may be ethical practices. Implications for therapists and MFT training programs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christi R. McGeorge.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Recruitment Email

Appendix A: Recruitment Email

You are being asked to complete an online survey intended to better understand why therapists think the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT) should add a statement to the AAMFT Code of Ethics labeling sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) and gender identity change efforts (GICE) as unethical.

Those who engage in SOCE, also known as conversion or reSimpleParative therapy, falsely claim that such efforts can alter a person’s marginalized sexual orientation (e.g., bisexual, lesbian, gay, pansexual, etc.) to heterosexual. Similarly, those who use GICE are seeking to change an individual’s marginalized gender identity (e.g., transgender, nonbinary, genderqueer, etc.) to a cisgender identity (i.e., gender identity that matches an individual’s sex assigned at birth). Because the purpose of this study is to identify why therapists believe statements labeling SOCE and GICE as unethical need to be added to the AAMFT code of ethics, eligibility for this study is limited to those who align with this stance.

Please complete this online survey by clicking on the following link: [click here]. The survey should take approximately 5 min to complete.

Your participation is voluntary, and you can quit the survey at any time. You may also choose to skip questions that you do not wish to answer. There are no known risks to participating in this survey, and your responses will be anonymous.

If you have any questions about this survey, please contact Dr. Christi McGeorge at christine.mcgeorge@ndsu.edu or (701) 231-7335. If you have questions about the rights of human participants in research, or to report a problem, please contact the University IRB office, 701-231-8995 or toll-free at (855) 800-6717.

Thank you!

Social Media Post.

Are you a therapist who believes in banning change efforts for gender identity and sexual orientation (aka conversion or reparative therapy) in the AAMFT Code of Ethics? Follow the QR code or the survey link to voice your thoughts in a 5-minute survey. North Dakota State University #IRB0003686.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGeorge, C.R., Coburn, K.O., Walsdorf, A.A. et al. “We Need to State it Overtly”: MFT’s Rationales for Labeling SOCE and GICE as Unethical in the Code of Ethic. Contemp Fam Ther 44, 436–451 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-022-09649-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-022-09649-2

Keywords

Navigation