Abstract
Catfish refer to people who use a false online persona to engage in one or more romantic relationships. The present study was guided by the Couple and Family Technology Framework to conduct a triangulation mixed-methods design. Data were collected from catfish perpetrators (n = 156) and targets (n = 826) via a web-based survey. Perpetration was positively associated with being a man, having a high education level, high religiosity, and negatively with being heterosexual and Hispanic/Latin American. Perpetration was predicted by impression management and narcissism and negatively by mate value and conscientiousness. Compared to face-to-face relationships, catfish unions were characterized by low levels of satisfaction and passionate love. The most common communication methods used in these relationships included text and instant messaging, and targets reported significantly greater self-disclosure than perpetrators. The top reasons for perpetrators’ identity selection included emulating an ideal self and enhancing mate value. Among perpetrators, a majority (55%) did not feel guilty about their identity misrepresentation but those who did primarily reported guilt resulting from the betrayal and keeping the relationship secret from other people. Clinical implications are provided for therapists working with clients who experience catfishing as a target and/or perpetrator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akagi, C. G., Schumm, W. R., & Bergen, M. B. (2003). Dimensionality of the Kansas Family Strengths Scale and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale as revised to capture changes in marital satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 93(3), 1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.93.8.1267-1274
Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
Anderson, T., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970600666834
Avila, J., Martz, G., & Napolitano, J. (2011). Online love triangle, deception end in murder. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/US/online-love-triangle-deception-end-murder/story?id=14371076
Bialer, P., & Mcintosh, C. (2016). Discrimination, stigma, and hate: The impact on the mental health and well-being of LGBT people. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 20(4), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2016.1211887
Brown, J., James, K., & Taylor, A. (2010). Caught in the rejection-abuse cycle: Are we really treating perpetrators of domestic abuse effectively? Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00494.x
Calzada, E. J., Fernandez, Y., & Cortes, D. E. (2010). Incorporating the cultural value of respeto into a framework of Latino parenting. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016071
Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others?: A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.340
Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Couch, D., Liamputtong, P., & Pitts, M. (2012). What are the real and perceived risks and dangers of online dating? Perspectives from online daters. Health, Risk & Society, 14(7/8), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.720964
Cresswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Crowell, C. R., Narvaez, D., & Gomberg, A. (2005). Moral psychology and information ethics: Psychological distance and the components of moral behavior in a digital world. In L. A. Freeman & A. G. Peace (Eds.), Information ethics: Privacy and intellectual property (pp. 19–37). Information Science Publishing.
Eichenberg, C., Huss, J., & Kitsel, C. (2017). From online dating to online divorce: An overview couple and family relationships shaped through digital media. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 249–260.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00
Evans, K., & Brase, G. L. (2007). Assessing sex differences and similarities in mate preferences: Above and beyond demand characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(5), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507081471
FBI.gov (n.d.). Romance scams. https://www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-scams-and-crimes/romance-scams
Feeney, J. A., & Hill, A. (2006). Victim-perpetrator differences in reports of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(4), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506065985
Germán, M., Gonzales, N. A., & Dumka, L. (2009). Familism values as protective factor for Mexican-origin adolescents exposed to deviant peers. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324475
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Gozna, L. F., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2001). The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(7), 1203–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00219-1
Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.010
Guthrie, J., & Kunkel, A. (2013). Tell me sweet (and not-so-sweet) little lies: Deception in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 64(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755637
Hall, J. A., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509349633
Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01420.x
Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16). SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621113
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
Hertlein, K. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61, 374–387.
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Baughman, H. M., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). What a tangled web we weave: The dark triad traits and deception. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.0
Kirsner, B. R., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among beck depression inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00048-4
Knight, G., Gonzales, N., Saenz, D., Bonds, D., Germán, M., Deardorff, J., Roosa, M., & Updegraff, K. (2010). The Mexican American Cultural Values Scale for adolescents and adults. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(3), 444–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609338178
Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z
Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
Lawson, H. M., & Leck, K. (2006). Dynamics of Internet dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305283402
Le, T. N. (2005). Narcissism and immature love as mediators of vertical individualism and ludic love style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054522
Le, B., Dove, N. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting non-marital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
Lo, S., Hsieh, A., & Chiu, Y. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.010
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
McLeod, B. A., & Genereux, R. L. (2008). Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.015
Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156003
Mosely, M., Lancaster, M., Parker, M. L., & Campbell, K. (2020). Adult attachment and online dating deception: A theory modernized. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2020.1714577
Nelson, J. A., Kirk, A. M., Ane, P., & Serres, S. A. (2011). Religious and spiritual values and moral commitment in marriage: Untapped resources in couples counseling? Counseling and Values, 55, 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2011.tb00034.x
O’Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/26.3.403
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Manual for the Paulhus Deception Scales: BIDR Version 7. Multi-Health Systems.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Phillips, M. C., Meek, S. W., & Vendemia, J. M. C. (2011). Understanding the underlying structure of deceptive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 783–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.031
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
Schumm, W. R. (1985). Criterion-related validity of the kansas marital satisfaction scale. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 719–722. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.719
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2016). Five facts about online dating. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/29/5-facts-about-online-dating/
Tadinac, M., & Hromatko, I. (2007). Own mate value and relative importance of a potential mate’s qualities. Studia Psychologica, 49(3), 251–264.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356437
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
Vogels, E. A. (2020). 10 facts about Americans and online dating. Pew Research Center.
Watson, P. J., & Biderman, M. D. (1994). Narcissistic Traits Scale: Validity evidence and sex differences in narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(3), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90076-0
Weaver, J. B., III. (2005). Mapping the links between personality and communicator style. Individual Differences Research, 3(1), 59–71.
Whitty, M. T. (2002). Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00059-0
Whitty, M. T. (2018). Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2, 105–109.
Whitty, M., & Buchanan, T. (2016). The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims-both financial and non-financial. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16, 176–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, K., Parker, M.L. Catfish: Exploring the Individual Predictors and Interpersonal Characteristics of Deceptive Online Romantic Relationships. Contemp Fam Ther 44, 422–435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-022-09646-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-022-09646-5