Abstract
Interactive technologies (e.g., cell phones, internet, social networking sites) are now a regular part of marital relationships. Relying on an Ecological Systems theoretical framework, the current qualitative priority mixed-methods study was based on 66 heterosexual married couples’ (n = 132 individuals) perspectives regarding the influence of interactive technology on marital relationships. A dyadic qualitative analysis resulted in three themes. First, participants reported that interactive technology can both facilitate distraction and connection. Second, couples indicated that interactive technology allowed them to conveniently communicate. Finally, participants shared that interactive technology can challenge relational boundaries. For this sample, there were no statically significant differences between quantified couple perspectives, but there were some differences in couple qualitative responses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Academy of Pediatrics (2016). American Academy of Pediatrics announces new recommendations for children’s media use. Retrieved from https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-Announces-New-Recommendations-for-Childrens-Media-Use.aspx.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Donahue, E. H. (2008). Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 18, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0008.
Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relation, 60, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x.
Cramer, E. M., & Mabry, E. A. (2015). Exploring the interaction of media richness and family characteristics in computer-mediated communication. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in the digital age (pp. 99–116). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Crane, D. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas marital satisfaction scale and the revised dyadic adjustment scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261800261815.
Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9231-5.
Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Guttmann, M. L., & Hanson, E. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dew, J., & Tulane, S. (2015). The association between time spent using entertainment media and marital quality in a contemporary dyadic national sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9427-y.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed mode surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.
Eisikovits, Z., & Koren, C. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1642–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376520.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051.
Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2018). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 11, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v11i2.273.
Helsper, E. J., & Whitty, M. T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006.
Hertlein, K. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61, 374–387. doi: 0.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.
McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031.
McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., Cravens, J. D., & Drouin, M. (2018). “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019.
McHale, S. M., Dotterer, A., & Kim, J. (2009). An ecological perspective on the media and youth development. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209331541.
Morgan, P., Hubler, D. S., Payne, P. B., Pomeroy, C., Gregg, D., & Homer, M. (2017). My partner’s media use: A qualitative study exploring perceptions of problems with a partner’s media use. Marriage & Family Review, 53, 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2016.1263589.
Morris, N., & Cravens Pickens, J. D. (2017). “I’m not a gadget”: A grounded theory on unplugging. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 45, 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2017.1365665.
Northrup, J., & Smith, J. (2016). Effects of Facebook maintenance behaviors on partners’ experience of love. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9379-5.
Norton, A. M., Baptist, J., & Hogan, B. (2018). Computer-mediated communication in intimate relationships: Associations of boundary crossing, intrusion, relationship satisfaction, and partner responsiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12246.
Novak, J. R., Sandberg, J. G., Jeffrey, A. J., & Young-Davis, S. (2016). The impact of texting on perceptions of face-to-face communication in couples in different relationship stages. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15, 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2015.1062452.
Perry, M. S., & Werner-Wilson, R. J. (2011). Couples and computer-mediated communication: A closer look at the affordances and use of the channel. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02099.x.
Perry, S. L., & Schleifer, C. (2018). Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. The Journal of Sex Research, 55, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709.
Pew Research Center (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/.
Pew Research Center (2018a). Internet/broadband fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/.
Pew Research Center (2018b). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
Rea, J., Behnke, A., Huff, N., & Allen, K. (2015). The role of online communication in the lives of military spouses. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9346-6.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
Rus, H. M., & Tiemensma, J. (2017). “It’s complicated.” A systematic review of associations between social network site use and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.004.
Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/352405.
Seidman, G., Langlais, M., & Havens, A. (2017). Romantic relationship-oriented Facebook activities and the satisfaction of belonging needs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000165.
Siebert, C. F., & Siebert, D. C. (2018). Data analysis with small samples and non-normal data. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.
Spencer, T. A., Lambertsen, A., Hubler, D. S., & Burr, B. K. (2017). Assessing the mediating effect of relationship dynamics between perceptions of problematic media use and relationship satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9407-0.
Upton, G. J. (1992). Fisher’s exact test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 155, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2982890.
Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.034.
van Manen, M. (1984). Doing phenomenological research and writing: An introduction (Monograph N. 7). Edmonton: Department of Secondary Education, Faculty of Education, University of Alberta.
Vaterlaus, J. M., Beckert, T. E., Tulane, S., & Bird, C. V. (2014). They always ask what I’m doing and who I’m talking to”: Parental mediation of adolescent interactive technology use. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2014.938795.
Vaterlaus, J. M., & Tulane, S. (2015). Digital generation gaps in parent-adolescent relationships. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 426–446). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Funding
There was no funding for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
IRB approval was obtained and participants completed an informed consent form documenting their rights and potential risks for participating in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaterlaus, J.M., Tulane, S. The Perceived Influence of Interactive Technology on Marital Relationships. Contemp Fam Ther 41, 247–257 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09494-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09494-w