Abstract
Reentry research has received much less attention than research on cultural adjustment in a foreign country, especially in the marriage and family therapy (MFT) field in the United States. Lack of research on international students’ job experiences and professional developments during reentry does not provide further information to evaluate the quality of MFT education in the United States. This study was intended to extend the reentry literature and specifically to understand personal and professional reentry experiences and cross-cultural transformation of MFT returnees in Taiwan. Thirteen participants were interviewed, and the resulting data was analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Analyses results demonstrated macro contextual factors that situated unique personal and professional reentry phenomena for international MFT graduate in Taiwan. The returnees strived to explore their MFT identity and interpret cross-cultural differences by developing four coping strategies (e.g., not wanting to fit in, doing what you were supposed to do or could do, processing with others, and therapists’ multicultural awareness) that were associated with three conditions, such as personal networks linking to professional networks, supervision, and training in MFT. Findings suggested that reentry adaption was varied and fitting into Taiwanese society might not be the final goal for the returnees. Training implications in the MFT field were provided based on the findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, N. (1981). Re-entry: Managing cross-cultural transitions. Group and Organization Studies, 6, 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011810060031.
Bae, S., Joo, E., & Orlinsky, D. E. (2003). Psychotherapists in South Korea: Professional and practice characteristics. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40(4), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.40.4.302.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Black, J. S., Gregersen, H. B., & Mendenhall, M. E. (1992). Toward a theoretical framework of repatriation and adjustment. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 737–760.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. California: University of California Press.
Brabant, S., Palmer, C. E., & Gramling, R. (1990). Returning home: An empirical investigation of cross-cultural re-entry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(90)90027-T.
Chamove, A. S., & Soeterik, S. M. (2006). Grief in returning Sojourners. Journal of Social Science, 13(3), 215–220.
Chan, S., & Lee, E. (2004). Families with Asian roots. In E. W. Lynch & M. J. Hanson (Eds.), Developingcross-culture competence: A guide for working with children and their families (pp. 219–298). Maryland, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Chao, W. (2011). Review and reflections on 40 years of family therapy development in Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 415–428.
Chao, W., & Huang, W. (2013). The development of family practice and training in Taiwan: A review and prospects for the future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9261-7.
Charmaz, K. (2009a). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. California: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2009b). Shifting the grounds: Constructivisit grounded theory medthods. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz & A. Clarke (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–154). California: Left Coast Press.
Crotty, M. (2007). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Los Angelous: Sage Publications.
Davidson, L. (1980). Patients that therapists find hard to treat: Cross-cultural perspectives. Hiroshima Forum for Psychology, 7, 3–8.
Deng, L., Lin, X., Lan, J., & Fang, X. (2013). Family therapy in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9273-3.
Gaw, K. F. (2000). Reverse culture shock in students returning from overseas. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00024-3.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Gullahorn, J. T., & Gullahorn, J. E. (1963). An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 19(3), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00447.x.
Huang, H. Y. (2008). Returning home from the U.K.: A study of reentry experiences and coping styles of Taiwanese student sojourners. Unpublished master’s thesis. Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hwang, K.-K., Liu, T.-W., Han, D.-Y., & Chen, S.-H. (2003). Somatization, emotional expression and Confucian ethics in Chinese culture. In W.-O. Phoon & I. Macindoe (Eds.), Untangling the threads: Perspectives on mental health in Chinese communities (pp. 47‑80). Sydney: Transcultural Mental Health Centre.
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaption. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kulkarni, M., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Valk, R. (2010). Employee perceptions of repatriation in an emerging economy: The indian experience. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 529–546.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993a). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993b). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review Psychology, 44, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.0.
Lee, E., Tsang, A. K., Bogo, M., Wilson, G., Johnstone, M., & Herschman, J. (2017). Joining revisited in family therapy: Discourse analysis of cross cultural encounters between a therapist and an immigrant family. Journal of Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12148.
Lock, A., & Strong, T. (2010). Social Constructionism: Sources and stirrings in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. N. (1984). The intercultural reentry: Conceptualization and directions for future research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(84)90035-X.
Martin, J. N., & Harrell, T. (2004). Intercultural reentry of students and professionals: Theory and practice. In D. Landis, J. M. Bennett & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 309–336). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231129.n13.
Ng, K. S. (2003). Global perspectives in family therapy: Development, practice and trends. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Nilsson, J. E., & Anderson, M. Z. (2004). Supervising international students: The role of acculturation, role ambiguity and multicultural discussions. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 35(3), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.35.3.306.
Pritchard, R. (2011). Re-entry trauma: Asian re-integration after studying in the West. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310365541.
Quek, K. M., & Chen, H. M. (2017). Family therapy in Chinese culture and context: Lessons from supervising therapists-in-training in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9401-y.
Rae, D., & Woodier-Harris, N. (2012). International entrepreneurship education: Post graduate business student experiences of entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 54(8), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274800.
Rogers, J., & Ward, C. (1993). Expectation-experience discrepancies and psychological adjustment during cross-cultural reentry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 17, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(93)90024-3.
Sahin, N. H. (1990). Re-entry and the academic and psychological problems of the second generation. Psychology and Developing Societies, 2(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336900020020.
Szkudlarek, B. (2009). Reentry—A review of the literature. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.06.006.
Thompson, C. L., & Christofi, V. (2006). Can you go home again? A phenomenological investigation of Cypriot students returning home after studying abroad. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 28(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-005-8493-0.
Tien, L., & Olson, K. (2003). Confucian past, conflicted present: Working with Asian American families. In L. B. Silverstein & T. J. Goodrich (Eds.), Feminist family therapy: Empowerment in social context (pp. 135–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10615-010.
Wang, H. (2013). Family therapy in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.cifa-net.org/pdf/symposium/1st/Family_Therapy_in_Taiwan.pdf.
Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Turkowski, L. W. (2010). Reentry issues upon returning from study abroad programs. Journal of College Student Development, 51(6), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2010.0015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, PF., Gale, J. Reentry Experiences and Professional Developments of International Marriage and Family Therapy Graduates in Taiwan. Contemp Fam Ther 40, 380–393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9464-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9464-z