From Online Dating to Online Divorce: An Overview of Couple and Family Relationships Shaped Through Digital Media

Abstract

From the very early stages of initiating relationships to types of post-break-up behaviors, the internet has the potential to play an influential role in all areas of family and particularly couple relationships. This paper examines how ICTs (“information and communication technology”) can shape such relationships. The impact on the various stages of relationships is systematized (relationship development, couple and family formation, separation) with a special focus on intergenerational opportunities and conflicts associated with modern media usage. Against the background of psychological and media communication theories and psychotherapeutic approaches as well as empirical findings the following topics are considered: (1) Initiation of relationships through ICTs (e.g. meet new partners through online dating); (2) Impact of digital media on relationship development and existing partnerships (e.g. new opportunities and internet-related challenges that have to be faced by couples) (3) Influence of ICTs on separations (e.g. online mediation, getting divorced online). In summary, the role of ICTs in new, existing and separated partnerships and families is multifaceted. An outlook on further developments as well as research desiderata is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbas, R., & Mesch, G. (2016). Do rich teens get richer? Facebook use and the link between offline and online social capital among Palestinian youth in Israel. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261168.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aditi, P. (2014). Is online better than offline for meeting partners? Depends: Are you looking to marry or to date. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 664–667. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aicken, C. R. H., Estcourt, C. S., Johnson, A. M., Sonnenberg, P., Wellings, K., & Mercer, C. H. (2016). Use of the internet for sexual health among sexually experienced persons aged 16 to 44 years: Evidence from a nationally representative survey of the British population. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.4373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Al Mutawa, N., Bryce, J., Franqueira, V. N. L., & Marrington, A. (2016). Forensic investigation of cyberstalking cases using behavioural evidence analyses [Supplemental material]. Digital Investigation, 16, S96-S103. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2016.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alhabash, S., Hales, K., Baek, J., & Oh, H. J. (2014). Effects of race, visual anonymity, and social category salience on online dating outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez, A. R. G. (2012). “IH8U”: Confronting cyberbullying and exploring the use of cybertools in teen dating relationships. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 1205–1215. doi:10.1002/jclp.21920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, T. L. (2005). Relationships among Internet attitudes, internet use, romantic beliefs, and perceptions of online romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aretz, W. (2016). Match me if you can: Eine explorative Studie zur Beschreibung der Nutzung von Tinder. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1. Retrieved from http://journal-bmp.de/2015/12/match-me-if-you-can-eine-explorative-studie-zur-beschreibung-der-nutzung-von-tinder/.

  9. Aretz, W., Becher, L., Casalino, A., & Bonorden, C. (2010). Digitale Eifersucht: Die Kehrseite soziale Netzwerke. Eine empirische Untersuchung. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aretz, W., Gansen-Ammann, D.-N., Mierke, K., & Musiol, A. (2017). Date me if you can: Ein systematischer Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand von online-dating. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 30, 7–34. doi:10.1055/s-0043-101465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, A. J. (2004). Double click: Romance and commitment among online couples. Cresskill: Hampton Press Book.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bay, B., Larsen, P. B., Kesmodel, U. S., & Ingerslev, H. J. (2014). Danish sperm donors across three decades: Motivations and attitudes. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 252–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berend, Z. (2016). The online world of surrogacy. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). The use of social networking sites for relationship maintenance in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 152–157. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitcom (2015). Retrieved from https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/9-Millionen-Deutsche-haben-Partner-im-Internet-gesucht.html.

  17. Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowers, J. R., Mitchell, E. T., Hardesty, J. L., & Hughes, R. Jr. (2011). A review of online divorce education programs. Family Court Review, 49(4), 776–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braun, C. (2009). Gruppenheimat im Cyberspace? Digitale Medien, Suchtgefährdung, Online-Therapie. Paper presented at Berliner Institut für Gruppenanalyse BIG, Berlin.

  20. Bridges, A. J. (2008). Dyadic consequences of non-addictive use of sexually explicit media. Oral presentation presented at the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Orlando, FL.

  21. Briken, P., & Basdekis-Jozsa, R. (2010). Sexuelle Sucht? Wenn sexuelles Verhalten außer Kontrolle gerät. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, 53, 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brym, R. J., & Lenton, R. L. (2001). Love online: A report on digital dating in Canada. Report. Retrieved from University of Toronto, Faculty of Arts & Science: http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/brym/loveonline.pdf, 2017/06/24.

  23. Campbell, L., & Kohut, T. (2016). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cavaglion, G., & Rashty, E. (2010). Narratives of suffering among Italian female partners of cybersex and cyber-porn dependents. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 17, 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Couch, D., Liamputtong, P., & Pitts, M. (2012). What are the real and perceived risks and dangers of online dating? Perspectives from online daters. Health, Risk & Society, 14, 697–714. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.720964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Daneback, K., Ross, M. W., & Mänsson, S. A. (2006). Characteristics and behaviors of sexual compulsives who use the Internet for sexual purposes. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13, 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Döring, N. (2000). Romantische Beziehungen im Netz. In K. Thimm (Ed.), Soziales im Netz. Sprache, Beziehungen und Kommunikationskulturen im Netz (pp. 39–70). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Döring, N. (2003). Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen im Internet (2 edn.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Döring, N. (2010). Wie wir Liebes- und sexualpartner im Internet finden: Der aktuelle Forschungsstand. Psychosozial, 4, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Döring, N. (2015). Smartphones, sex und social media: Erwachsenwerden im Digitalzeitalter. Wie Jugendliche in Deutschland mit Smartphone, apps und social-media-plattformen umgehen. Televizion, 28, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Döring, N. (2017). Vom Internetsex zum Robotersex: Forschungsstand und Herausforderungen für die Sexualwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 30, 35–57. doi:10.1055/s-0043-101471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Döring, N., & Dietmar, C. (2003). Mediated communication in couple relationships: Approaches for theoretical modelling and initial qualitative findings. Forum Qualitative Social Research FQS, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.nicola-doering.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/D%C3%B6ring-Dietmar-2003-Mediatisierte-Paarkommunikation.pdf.

  33. Doss, B. D., Cicila, L. N., Georgia, E. J., Roddy, M. K., Nowlan, K. M., Benson, L. A., et al. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of the web-based OurRelationship program: Effects on relationship and individual functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 285–296. doi:10.1037/ccp000006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dreßing, H., Bailer, J., Anders, A., Wagner, H., & Gallas, C. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 61–67. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eichenberg, C. (2007). Online-Sexualberatung: Wirksamkeit und Wirkweise. Evaluation eines ProFamilia-Angebots. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 3, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eichenberg, C. (2009). Internetnutzung und Sexualität aus gesundheitspsychologischer Perspektive. In B. U. Stetina & I. Kryspin-Exner (Eds.), Gesundheit und Neue Medien. Psychologische Aspekte der Interaktion mit Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (pp. 85–111). Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eichenberg, C. (2010). Zusammen—getrennt: Paarbeziehungen im Internet aus medienpsychologischer und psychodynamischer Perspektive. In H. G. Soeffner (Ed.), Unsichere Zeiten. Herausforderungen gesellschaftlicher Transformationen. Verhandlungen des 34. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Jena 2008. Wiesbaden: Springer. (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eichenberg, C., & Auersperg, F. (in press). Chancen und Risiken digitaler Medien für Kinder und Jugendliche: Ein Ratgeber für Eltern und Pädagogen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  39. Eichenberg, C., & Auersperg, F. (2013). Auswirkungen von Online-Sexualität auf das sexuelle Verhalten. Schlussfolgerungen aus dem aktuellen Stand der Forschung. Psychotherapie im Dialog, 2, 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eichenberg, C., & Blokus, G. (2010). Cybersexsucht: Epidemiologie, Diagnostik, Ätiologie und Therapie—Ein Überblick zum Stand der Forschung. Psychologie in Österreich, 2(3), 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eichenberg, C., & Kühne, S. (2014). Einführung Onlineberatung und-therapie. München: Reinhardt UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eichenberg, C., Schott, M., Decker, O., & Sindelar, B. (2017). Attachment style and internet addiction: An online survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, e170. doi:10.2196/jmir.6694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. (2015). Family dynamics and Internet use in Britain: What role do children play in adults’ engagement with the internet? Information, Communication & Society, 18, 156–171. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.942344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online-dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. doi:10.1177/152910061243652. Retrieved from https://www3.nd.edu/~ghaeffel/OnineDating_Aron.pdf.

  46. Fiore, A. T. (2004). Romantic regressions: An analysis of behavior in online dating systems. Master’s thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  47. Fox, J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: Attachment, dependence, distress, and post-dissolution online surveillance via social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 491–498. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Franke, G. H. (2000). BSI. Brief symptom inventory—Deutsche version. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). Gamete donation: Parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–516. doi:10.1093/humrep/den469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31, 2082–2089. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Freud, S. (1945). Formulierungen über zwei Prinzipien des psychischen Geschehens. Gesammelte Werke (VIII). London: Imago.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gauthier, D. K., & Forsyth, C. J. (1999). Bareback sex, bug chasers, and the gift of death. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Geser, H., & Bühler, E. (2006). Partnerwahl online. Retrieved from http://socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser15.htm.

  54. Gonyea, J. L. (2004). Internet sexuality: Clinical implications for couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gramatikov, M., & Klaming, L. (2011). Getting divorced online: Procedural and outcome justice in online divorce mediation. TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1752903. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1752903.

  56. Hall, J. A. (2014). First comes social networking, then comes marriage? Characteristics of Americans married 2005–2012 who met through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 322–326. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Handel, M. J., & Shklovski, I. (2012). Disclosure, ambiguity and risk reduction in real-time dating sites. GROUP12 Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (pp. 175–178). doi:10.1145/2389176.2389203.

  58. Heller, J., & Dresing, T. (2001). Chat - Kommunikationsmedium mit Entwicklungspotential. In R. Bader, W. Schindler & B. Eckmann (Eds.), Bildung in virtuellen Welten—Praxis und Theorieaußerschulischer Bildung mit Internet und Computer (pp. 83–90). Frankfurt: Gemeinschaftswerk der Evangelischen Publizistik.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, L. C. (2014). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hoffmann, J. (2006). Stalking. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Huels, D. J. (2011). Beginning romantic relationships online: A phenomenological examination of Internet couples. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72(5-B), 3135.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hugger, K.-U. (Ed.). (2010). Digitale Jugendkulturen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales: Reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Keehn, J., Howell, E., Sauer, M. V., & Klitzman, R. (2015). How agencies market egg donation the internet: A qualitative study. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43, 610–618. doi:10.1111/jlme.12303.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lampert, C., Schmidt, J. H., & Schulz, W. (2011). Jugendliche und Social Web—Fazit und Handlungsbereiche. In J. H. Schmidt, I. Paus-Hasebrink & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Heranwachsen mit dem Social Web. Zur Rolle von web 2.0-Angeboten im Alltag von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen (pp. 275–297). Berlin: Vistas.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lee, S. J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509–531. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01451.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Linke, C. (2010). Medien im Alltag von Paaren. Eine Studie zur Mediatisierung der Kommunikation in Paarbeziehungen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lyndon, A., Bonds-Raacke, J., & Cratty, A. D. (2011). College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12), 711–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Maddox, A. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 441–448. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mao, A., & Raguram, A. (2009). Online infidelity: The new challenge to marriages. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 302–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 473–495. doi:10.1080/13691180600858705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More infromation than you ever wanted: Does facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Poley, M. E., & Luo, S. (2012). Social compensation or rich-get-richer? The role of social competence in college students’ use of the Internet to find a partner. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 414–419. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Pollock, S. L. (2006). Internet counseling and its feasibility for marriage and family counseling. The Family Journal, 14, 65–70. doi:10.1177/1066480705282057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ramirez, Jr. A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Reime, B. (2017). Leihmutterschaft—Assistenzbusiness in der globalisierten Welt. In P. Biniok & E. Lettkemann (Eds.), Assistive Gesellschaft: Multidisziplinäre Erkundungen zur Sozialform “Assistenz” (pp. 145–163). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2124–2157. Retrieved from http://www.csudh.edu/psych/+FINAL%20ONLINE%20DATING%20ARTICLE%20IN%20PRESS%20VERSION%20-%20Rosen,%20Cheever,%20Cummings,%20Felt.pdf.

  81. Saini, M., Mishna, F., Barnes, J., & Polak, S. (2013). Parenting online: An exploration of virtual parenting time in the context of seperation and divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 10, 120–140. doi:10.1080/15379418.2013.796265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Schneider, J. P. (2003). The impact of compulsive cybersex behaviours on the family. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schneider, J. P., Weiss, R., & Samenow, C. (2012). Is it really cheating? Understanding the emotional reactions and clinical treatment of spouses and partners affected by cybersex infidelity. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 19, 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Schramm, D. G., & McCaulley, G. (2012). Divorce education for parents: A comparison of online and in-person delivery methods. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 602–617. doi:10.1080/10502556.2012.721301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Skopek, J. (2012). Partnerwahl im Internet. Eine quantitative Analyse von Strukturen und Prozessen der Online-Partnersuche. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Staley, C., & Prause, N. (2013). Erotica viewing effects on intimate relationships and self/partner evaluations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 615–624. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0034-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Statista (2015a). Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/511468/umfrage/anteil-der-online-dating-nutzer-nach-geschlecht-in-den-usa/.

  88. Statista (2015b). Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/76504/umfrage/anzahl-der-nutzer-von-online-dating-boersen-seit-2003/.

  89. Statista (2016). Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/510944/umfrage/bester-weg-einen-partner-eine-partnerin-fuer-eine-langfristige-beziehung-zu-finden/.

  90. Stinson, S., & Jeske, D. (2016). Exploring online dating preferences in line with the “social compensation” and “rich-get-richer hypothesis”. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 6, 75–87. doi:10.4018/IJCBPL.2016100106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 321–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 849–852. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Vossler, A. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 24, 359–366. doi:10.1177/1066480716663191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28, 105–134. doi:10.1177/009365001028001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Weinstein, A. M., Zolek, R., Babkin, A., Cohen, K., & Lejoyeux, M. (2015). Factors predicting cybersex use and difficulties in forming intimate relationships among male and female users of cybersex. Frontiers in Psychiatry. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00054. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00054/full.

  96. Wendt, V. (2016). Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit einesLiebestagebuchszur Reduktion beziehungsspezifischer InterpretationsverzerrungenEine randomisierte Wartegruppenstudie Master’s thesis. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.

  97. Wéry, A., & Billieux, J. (2017). Problematic cybersex: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 238–246. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00088.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachmann, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063–1077. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Eichenberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eichenberg, C., Huss, J. & Küsel, C. From Online Dating to Online Divorce: An Overview of Couple and Family Relationships Shaped Through Digital Media. Contemp Fam Ther 39, 249–260 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9434-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Digital media
  • Couple and family relationship
  • Online-dating
  • Online-communication
  • Family models