Abstract
Much has been written about online communication between therapists and clients, particularly regarding the feasibility, ethics, and frequency of such practices. Little, however, has been published with regard to electronic communication patterns between therapists and their supervisors. The purpose of this study was to understand if and how electronic communication is used between marriage and family therapy (MFT) supervisees and supervisors. To accomplish this, we administered a mixed data survey to MFT supervisors and supervisees across the United States regarding frequency of interaction via electronic methods. We also assessed comfort level with online supervision, how supervisory participants make determinations when to use online supervision, and when online communication is believed to be most appropriate within MFT supervision. We report both qualitative and quantitative findings regarding the use of online technologies in supervision. Implications for research, training, and supervision are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbass, A., Arthey, S., Elliott, J., Fedak, T., Nowoweiski, D., Markovski, J., et al. (2011). Web-conference supervision for advanced psychotherapy training: A practical guide. Psychotherapy, 48, 109–118. doi:10.1037/a0022427.
Bacigalupe, G. (2010). Supervision 2.0: E-supervision a decade later. Family Therapy Supervisor Bulletin, 9, 38–41. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/gonzalo_bacigalupe/9/.
Blumer, M. L. C. (2014). Ecological elements in couple and family therapy technological practice. MFT Courier, 28(2), 2–5.
Blumer, M. L. C. (2015). Couple and family therapy technology practices: A framework for ethical engagement. Family Therapy Magazine, 40–45. Retrieved from http://dx5br1z4f6n0k.cloudfront.net/imis15/Documents/JA15.FTM.singlepage.compressed.pdf.
Blumer, M. L. C., Green, M. S., Compton, D., & Barrera, A. M. (2010). Reflections on becoming feminist therapists: Honoring our feminist mentors. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy: An International Forum, 22, 57–87. doi:10.1080/08952831003652319.
Blumer, M. L. C., & Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Addressing ambiguity in e-practice management: Family therapy and supervision in a digital age. Family Therapy Magazine, 16–18. Retrieved from http://www.aamft.org/iMIS15/magazine/NovDec2012/.
Blumer, M. L. C., Hertlein, K. M., & VandenBosch, M. L. (2015). Towards the development of educational core competencies for couple and family therapy technology practices. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 37, 113–121. doi:10.1007/s10591-015-9330-1.
Blumer, M. L. C., & Murphy, M. J. (2011). Alaskan gay male’s couple experiences of societal non-support: Coping through families of choice and therapeutic means. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 33, 273–290. doi:10.1007/s10591-011-9147-5.
Chapman, R. A. (2006). Cybersupervision of entry level practicum supervisees: The effect on acquisition of counselor competence and confidence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5097.
Chapman, R. A., Baker, S. B., Nassar-McMillan, S. C., & Gerler, E. R. (2011). Cybersupervision: Further examination of synchronous and asynchronous modalities in counseling practicum supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 50, 298–313. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb01917.x.
Cheon, H., Blumer, M. L. C., Shih, A., Murphy, M. J., & Sato, M. (2009). The influence of supervisor and supervisee matching, role conflict, and supervisory relationship on supervisee satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 31, 52–67. doi:10.1007/s10591-008-9078-y.
Coker, J. K., Jones, W. P., Staples, P. A., & Harbach, R. L. (2002). Cyber supervision in the first practicum: Implications for research and practice. Guidance and Counselling, 18(1), 33–38. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9989271/cybersupervision-first-practicum-implications-research-practice.
Coursol, D. (2004). Cybersupervision: Conducting supervision on the information superhighway (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478221). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478221.pdf.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social Media Update 2014. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/social-media/social-media-use-by-age-group/.
Ellis, M. V. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 95–116. doi:10.1080/07325221003741910.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2012). The importance of competency-based clinical supervision and training in the Twenty-first Century: Why bother? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42(3), 129–137. doi:10.1007/s10879-011-9198-9.
Gambrel, L. E., & Butler, J. L. (2013). Mixed methods research in marriage and family therapy: A content analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 163–181. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00260.x.
Greenwalt, B. C. (2001). Cybersupervision: Some ethical issues. AAMFT Supervision Bulletin, 12–14. Retrieved from http://mftcourses.net/documents/greenwalt%202001.pdf.
Hertlein, K. M., Blumer, M. L. C., & Mihaloliakos, J. H. (2014). Marriage and family counselors’ perceived ethical issues related to online therapy. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(3), 5–12. doi:10.1177/1066480714547184.
Hertlein, K. M., Blumer, M. L. C., & Smith, J. M. (2013). Marriage and family therapists’ use and comfort with online communication with clients. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 35, 58–69. doi:10.1007/s10591-013-9284-0.
Inman, A. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 73–85. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01589.x.
Kanz, J. E. (2001). Clinical-supervision.com: Issues in the provision of online supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(4), 415–420. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.32.4.415.
Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 143–189). New York: Wiley.
Lee, R. E., Dunn, J. W., & Nichols, W. C. (2005). A comparison of AAMFT approved supervisors with master’s and doctoral degrees. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 27, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10591-004-1967-0.
Luke, M., & Gordon, C. (2012). Supervisors’ use of reinforcement, reframing, and advice to re author the supervisory narrative through e-mail supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 159–177. doi:10.1080/07325223.2013.730020.
McAdams, C. R., & Wyatt, K. L. (2010). The regulation of technology-assisted distance counseling and supervision in the United States: An analysis of current extent, trends, and implications. Counselor Education and Supervision, 49, 179–192. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2010.tb00097.x.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Myrick, R. D., & Russell, S. A. (1995). Cyberspace: New place for counselor supervision. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 30, 35–44. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42871190.
National Board of Certified Counselors. (2008). The practice of Internet counseling. Greensboro, NC: Center for Credentialing and Education, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.nbcc.org/Assets/Ethics/internetCounseling.pdf.
Nelson, J. A., Nichter, M., & Henriksen, R. (2010). On-line supervision and face-to-face supervision in the counseling internship: An exploratory study of similarities and differences. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_46.pdf.
Nickelson, D. W. (1998). Telehealth and the evolving health care system: Strategic opportunities for professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 527–535. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.29.6.527.
Northey, W. (2002). Characteristics and clinical practices of marriage and family therapists: A national survey. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 487–494. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb00373.x.
Olson, M. M., Russell, C. S., & White, M. B. (2002). Technological implications for clinical supervision and practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 201–215. doi:10.1300/J001v20n02_15.
Perry, C. W. (2012). Constructing professional identity in an online graduate clinical training program: Possibilities for online supervision. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 31, 53–67. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2012.31.3.53.
Rees, C., & Gillam, D. (2001). Training in cognitive-behavioural therapy for mental health professionals: A pilot study of videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7, 300–303. doi:10.1258/1357633011936561.
Rousmaniere, T., Abbass, A., & Frederickson, J. (2014a). New developments in technology-assisted supervision and training: A practical overview. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70, 1082–1093. doi:10.1002/jclp.22129.
Rousmaniere, T., Abbass, A., Frederickson, J., Henning, I., & Taubner, S. (2014b). Videoconference for psychotherapy training and supervision: Two case examples. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 68, 231–250. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tony_Rousmaniere/publication/264352005_Videoconference_for_Psychotherapy_Training_and_Supervision_Two_Case_Examples/links/540a3e560cf2d8daaabfa2d7.pdf.
Rousmaniere, T., & Frederickson, J. (2013). Internet-based one-way-mirror supervision for advanced psychotherapy training. The Clinical Supervisor, 32, 40–55. doi:10.1080/07325223.2013.778683.
Sørlie, T., Gammon, D., Bergvik, S., & Sexton, H. (1999). Psychotherapy supervision face-to-face and by videoconferencing: A comparative study. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 15, 452–462. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0118.1999.tb00475.
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
Storm, C. L. (2002). Teaching therapists to become supervisors. In T. C. Todd & C. L. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (pp. 363–372). Lincoln, NE: Authors Choice Press.
Storm, C. L., Todd, T. C., Sprenkle, D. H., & Morgan, M. M. (2001). Gaps between MFT supervision assumptions and common practice: Suggested best practices. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 227–239. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb01159.x.
Taylor, R. J., & Gonzales, F. (2005). Communication flow and change theory within a family therapy supervision model. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 27, 163–176. doi:10.1007/s10591-005-4037-3.
Twist, M. L. C., & Hertlein, L. M. (2015). E-mail me, tweet me, follow me, friend me: Online professional networking between family therapists. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy: An International Forum, 27(3–4), 116–133. doi:10.1080/08952833.2015.1065651.
Twist, M. L. C., & Hertlein, K. M. (in press). Ethical couple and family e-therapy. In M. J. Murphy & L. Hecker (Eds.), Ethics and professional issues in couple and family therapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Vaccaro, N., & Lambie, G. W. (2007). Computer-based counselor-in-training supervision: Ethical and practical implications for counselor educators and supervisors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47, 46–57. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2007.tb00037.x.
VandenBos, G. R., & Williams, S. (2000). The internet versus the telephone: What is telehealth, anyway? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 450–492. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.5.490.
Vespia, K. M., Heckman-Stone, C., & Delworth, U. (2002). Describing and facilitating effective supervision behavior in counseling trainees. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39, 56–65. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.39.1.56.
Watson, J. C. (2003). Implementing computer technology into the delivery of counseling supervision. Journal of Technology in Supervision, 3. Retrieved from http://telehealth.org/manual-uploads-webpage-attach/ComputerBasedSupervision.pdf.
Wetchler, J. L., Trepper, T. S., McCollum, E. E., & Nelson, T. S. (1993). Videotape supervision via long-distance telephone. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 242–247. doi:10.1080/01926189308250922.
Williams, L., Johnson, E., & Patterson, J. E. (2013). The appropriate use and misuse of social media in MFT training programs: Problems and prevention. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 35, 698–712. doi:10.1007/s10591-013-9256-4.
Wood, J. A. V., Miller, T. W., & Hargrove, D. S. (2005). Clinical supervision in rural settings: A telehealth model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 173–179. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.2.173.
Workfront (2015). The work-life imbalance report. Retrieved August from http://www.workfront.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2015/04/workfront-work-life-imbalance-report.pdf.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by a grant from the Alaska Association for Marriage and Family Therapy obtained by the first and second authors. Parts of this manuscript were previously presented at the: 2012 Alaska Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Annual Conference in Anchorage, AK, 2012 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Annual Conference in Charlotte, NC, and at the 2013 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Annual Conference in Portland, OR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Twist, M.L.C., Hertlein, K.M. & Haider, A. Electronic Communication in Supervisory Relationships: A Mixed Data Survey. Contemp Fam Ther 38, 424–433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9391-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9391-9