Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The R-URICA: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and a Revision to the URICA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing and measuring client motivation to change has been of great interest to therapists and researchers in a variety of fields. The authors of this manuscript present the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) in a sample of individuals in couple therapy. A sample of 603 individuals engaged in couple therapy completed the URICA as part of intake measures. Interpretation of the results indicated that a modified version of the URICA, the R-URICA provides a three-factor solution that best fits the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anatchkova, M. D., Velicer, W. F., & Prochaska, J. O. (2005). Replication of subtypes for smoking cessation within the contemplation stage of change. Addictive Behaviors, 30(5), 915–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anatchkova, M. D., Velicer, W. F., & Prochaska, J. O. (2006). Replication of subtypes for smoking cessation within the precontemplation stage of change. Addictive Behaviors, 31(7), 1101–1115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, K. A., Morgenstern, J., Morgan, T. J., Labouvie, E., & Bux, D. A. (2003). Motivational subtypes and continuous measures of readiness for change: Concurrent and predictive validity. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, 17(1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, D. M., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H., & Christensen, C. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, R. C., Taylor, L., Moore, B. A., Jungerman, F. S., De Biaze Vilela, F. A., & Budney, A. J. (2008). Recovery and URICA stage-of-change scores in three marijuana treatment studies. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35(4), 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1998). Acceptance versus change interventions in behavioral couple therapy: Impact on couples’ in-session communication. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 24(4), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss, B. D., Atkins, D., & Christensen, A. (2003). Who’s dragging their feel? Husbands and wives seeking marital therapy. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 29(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., Ford, C. L., Alden, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1993). In-session change in emotionally focused therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, D. K., Franklin, M. E., & McGuffin, P. (1999). Measuring motivation to change: An examination of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA) in an adolescent sample. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 36(1), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A. S., & Kniskern, D. P. (1992). The future of marital and family therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 29(1), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., & Talitman, E. (1997). Predictors of success in emotionally focused marital therapy. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 23(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, D. A., Gelles, R. J., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). Development and validation of a stages of change measure for men in batterer treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. H., & Girvin, H. (2002). Stages of change: A critique. Behavior Modification, 26(2), 223–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughy, E. A., DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 26(4), 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughy, E. A., Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(3), 368–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napper, L. E., Wood, M. M., Jaffe, A., Fisher, D. G., Reynolds, G. L., & Klahn, J. A. (2008). Convergent and discriminant validity of three measures of stage of change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(3), 362–371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pekarik, G. (1992). Posttreatment adjustment of clients who drop out early vs. late in treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(3), 379–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrocelli, J. V. (2002). Processes and stages of change: Counseling with the transtheoretical model of change. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(1), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. M., Wynne, L. C., & Hambright, A. B. (1996). The outcomes of couple and family therapy: Findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33(2), 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., & Redding, C. (2005). Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 41(2), 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project MATCH Research Group. (1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkin, J. A., Johnson, S. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (2001). Applying the Transtheoretical Model to regular moderate exercise in an overweight population: Validation of a stages of change measure. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 33(5), 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. L., & Wolfe, D. A. (2003). Readiness to change as a predictor of outcome in batterer treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 879–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., & Baldwin, S. A. (2003). Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 29(4), 547–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., Subich, L. M., & Kalodner, C. (1995). The transthoretical model’s stages and processes of change and their relation to premature termination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(1), 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H. (2002). Introduction. In D. H. Sprenkle (Ed.), Effectiveness research in marriage and family therapy (pp. 9–26).

  • Sprenkle, D. H. (2003). Effectiveness research in marriage and family therapy: Introduction. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 29(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambling, R. B., & Johnson, L. N. (2008). The relationship between stages of change and outcome in couple therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(3), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambling, R. B., & Johnson, L. N. (2010). Client expectations about couple therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 38(4), 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambling, R. B., & Johnson, L. N. (2012). An exploratory factor analysis of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment among couple therapy clients. The Family Journal, 20(1), 59–65. doi:10.1177/1066480711429537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel B. Tambling.

Appendix: The R-URICA

Appendix: The R-URICA

Each statement describes what a person might think when starting therapy or approaching problems in their lives. Please indicate the extent to which you tend to agree or disagree with each statement. In each case, make your choice in terms of what you think right now, not what you have felt in the past or would like to feel. “Here” refers to the place of treatment or the problem.

1 = Strongly Disagree

2 = Disagree

3 = Undecided

4 = Agree

5 = Strongly Agree

3.

I am doing something about the problems that had been bothering me.

1

2

3

4

5

7.

I am finally doing some work on my problem.

1

2

3

4

5

14.

I am really working hard to change.

1

2

3

4

5

17.

Even though I’m not always successful in changing, I am at least working on my problems.

1

2

3

4

5

19.

I wish I had more ideas on how to solve the problem.

1

2

3

4

5

20.

I have started working on my problems but I would like help.

1

2

3

4

5

21.

Maybe this place will be able to help me.

1

2

3

4

5

23.

I may be part of the problems, but I don’t really think I am.

1

2

3

4

5

24.

I hope that someone here will have some good advice for me.

1

2

3

4

5

25.

Anyone can talk about changing; I’m actually doing something about it.

1

2

3

4

5

26.

All this talk about psychology is boring. Why can’t people just forget about their problems?

1

2

3

4

5

29.

I have worries but so does the next guy. Why spend time thinking about them?

1

2

3

4

5

30.

I am actively working on my problem.

1

2

3

4

5

31.

I would rather cope with my faults than try to change them.

1

2

3

4

5

Three subscales:

Action 3, 7, 14, 17, 25, 30

Seeking Assistance 19 and 24

Ambivalence 23, 26, 29, 31

Total score method of scoring—Reverse score the Ambivalence items, add Action items and Seeking Assistance items to the reverse scored Ambivalence items.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tambling, R.B., Ketring, S.A. The R-URICA: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis and a Revision to the URICA. Contemp Fam Ther 36, 108–119 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9279-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9279-x

Keywords

Navigation