Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 773–792 | Cite as

The Social Construction of Love Through Intergenerational Processes

  • Kristy L. Soloski
  • Thomas W. Pavkov
  • Kathryn A. Sweeney
  • Joseph L. Wetchler
Original Paper
  • 958 Downloads

Abstract

Love became an integral part of marriage in Western culture in the mid-1900s. Marriage began to change along with the inclusion of love, which is evidenced by changes in divorce rates. While marriages themselves change, love too may be influenced in a reciprocal process. This study was interested in identifying the association between parental relationship factors, including marital status and interparental conflict, and both the experience of and expectations for love. The sample was collected using online convenience sampling, and included (N = 207) heterosexually married participants. Hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to determine the unique contribution of the parent marital factors on love. Higher levels of interparental conflict were associated with lower levels of love and expectations for love, while having parents who were separated was associated with higher relationship expectations. These findings can support case conceptualizations for clinical work with couples and the use of Narrative and Transgenerational therapies.

Keywords

Couple’s therapy Expectations Love Marriage Relationship satisfaction Social construction 

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (2001). The legacy of parents’ marital discord: Consequences for children’s marital quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 627–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, E. H., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2009). Covenant marriage and the sanctification of gendered marital roles. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Hierarchical model of love and its prediction of satisfaction in close relationships. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 79–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). The social construction of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(3), 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Vital and Health Statistics Reports, 23.Google Scholar
  7. Bulanda, J. R., & Brown, S. L. (2007). Race-ethnic differences in marital quality and divorce. Social Science Research, 36, 945–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1970). Differentials in marital instability. American Sociological Review, 37(6), 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns, A., & Dunlop, R. (2002). Parental marital quality and family conflict: Longitudinal effects on adolescents from divorcing and non-divorcing families. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 37(1/2), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. (2008). FastStats: Marriage and divorce. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm.
  11. Clarke, S. C. (1995). Advance report of final divorce statistics, 1989 and 1990. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 43(9). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/mvsr/supp/mv43_09s.pdf.
  12. Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. London: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Corporation, I. B. M. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics 19. Somers: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Corra, M., Carter, S. K., Carter, J. S., & Knox, D. (2009). Trends in marital happiness by gender and race, 1973–2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30(10), 1379–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui, M., Fincham, F. D., & Pasley, B. K. (2008). Young adult romantic relationships: The role of parents’ marital problems and relationship efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1226–1235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dakin, J., & Wampler, R. (2008). Money doesn’t buy happiness, but it helps: Marital satisfaction, psychological distress, and demographic differences between low- and middle-income clinic couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forste, R., & Heaton, T. B. (2004). The divorce generation: Well-being, family attitudes, and socioeconomic consequences of marital disruption. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 41(1/2), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowers, B. J. (1991). His and her marriage: A multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24(3–4), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilford, R., & Bengtson, V. (1979). Measuring marital satisfaction in three generations: Positive and negative dimensions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(2), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glenn, N. D., & Kramer, K. B. (1987). The marriages and divorces of the children of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 811–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glenn, N. D., Uecker, J. E., & Love, R. W. B. (2010). Later first marriage and marital success. Social Science Research, 39, 787–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63, 558–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen, S. R. (2006). Courtship duration as a correlate of marital satisfaction and stability. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B The Sciences and Engineering, 67(4-B), 2279.Google Scholar
  25. Herzog, M. J., & Cooney, T. M. (2002). Parental divorce and perceptions of past interparental conflict: Influences on the communication of young adults. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 36(3/4), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process, 29(1), 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson, W. W., & Murphy, G. J. (1980). The non-linear relationship between marital satisfaction and stages of the family life cycle: An artifact of Type I errors? Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, S. (2008). Hold me tight: Seven conversations for a lifetime of love. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  29. Jose, O., & Alfons, V. (2007). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 73–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerkmann, B. C., Lee, T. R., Lown, J. M., & Allgood, S. M. (2000). Financial management, financial problems and marital satisfaction among recently married University students. Financial Counseling and Planning, 11(2), 55–65.Google Scholar
  31. Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H. (2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent dating relationships: Integrating cognitive, emotional, and peer influence. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 505–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lasswell, M., & Lobsenz, N. M. (1980). Styles of loving. New York: Ballaantine.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levine, R., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J. (1995). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levinger, G., Rands, M., & Talaber, R. (1977). The assessment of involvement and rewardingness in close and casual pair relationships (National Science Foundation Technical Report). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  38. Orathinkal, J., & Vansteenwegen, A. (2006). Religiosity and marital satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 265–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanderson, B., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Race and gender as moderator variables in predicting relationship satisfaction and relationship commitment in a sample of dating heterosexual couples. Family Relations, 42(3), 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schumm, W. R., Bollman, S. R., & Jurich, A. P. (1997). Gender and marital satisfaction: A replication using a seven-point item response version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Reports, 81(3, Pt 1), 1004–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychology Review, 93(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sternberg, R. J., & Barnes, M. (1985). Real and ideal others in romantic relationships: Is four a crowd? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1586–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sternberg, R. J., & Grajek, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sullivan, K. T. (2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 610–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teachman, J. D. (2002). Childhood living arrangements and the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Topham, G. L., Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (2005). Family-of-origin predictors of hostile conflict in early marriage. Contemporary Family Therapy, 27(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Uecker, J. E. (2008). Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 728–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Statistical abstracts of the United States. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/03statab/vitstat.pdf.
  51. White, L., & Edwards, J. N. (1990). Emptying the nest and parental well-being: An analysis of national panel data. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Whitley, B. E. (1993). Reliability and aspects of the construct validity of Sternberg’s Triangular Love Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu, T., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of relationship quality: The effects of parental remarriage quality on young adults’ relationships. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 47(3/4), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristy L. Soloski
    • 1
  • Thomas W. Pavkov
    • 2
  • Kathryn A. Sweeney
    • 3
  • Joseph L. Wetchler
    • 4
  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.School of Family, Consumer, and Family SciencesNorthern Illinois UniversityDekalbUSA
  3. 3.Behavioral SciencesHammondUSA
  4. 4.Couple and Family Therapy CenterHammondUSA

Personalised recommendations