Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 74–90 | Cite as

Facebook Infidelity: When Poking Becomes Problematic

  • Jaclyn D. CravensEmail author
  • Kaitlin R. Leckie
  • Jason B. Whiting
Original Paper


Recent research has focused on the Internet and relationships; however, little attention has been given to the specific role of social networking sites in relationship betrayal. Exploring the processes related to discovery of Facebook infidelity behaviors adds another layer to understanding Internet infidelity and highlights the behaviors unique to Facebook infidelity. Stories about cheating (N = 90), taken from the website were analyzed using grounded theory methodology to create a process model of discovery. Researchers sought to answer four questions: (1) What is the experience of nonparticipating partners when their partners have engaged in infidelity behaviors on Facebook? (2) What are the basic social processes that occur when discovering the infidelity behaviors? And, (3) What are the basic psychological processes that occur? (4) What similarities or differences exist between the current research on offline and online infidelity and the process model from the current study? The categories are arranged in a process model, which depicts these processes as well as the emotional experience of the nonparticipating partner. The model highlights important phases through which the nonparticipating partner cycled following the discovery of the infidelity. These include appraising the boundary damage, acting on the appraisal, and making a decision about the relationship. Suggestions for clinical intervention based on this process are provided. Future research implications are also discussed.


Facebook Infidelity Social networking Grounded theory Process Discovery 


  1. Afifi, W. A., Falato, W. L., & Weiner, J. L. (2001). Identity concerns following a severe relational transgression: The role of discovery method for the relational outcomes of infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(2), 291–308. doi: 10.1177/0265407501182007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-373.2010.00723.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 612–624. doi: 10.2307/353949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Associated Press. (2012). Facebook reaches 1 billion users. Time. Retrieved from:
  5. Barak, A., & Fisher, W. A. (1999). Sex, guys, and cyberspace: Effects of Internet pornography and Individual differences on men’s attitudes toward women. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 63–91. doi: 10.1300/J056v11n01_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 183–216. doi: 10.111/j.1752-0606.2005tb01555.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex & Martial Therapy, 29, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/713847097.Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, A. (1998). Surfing into the new millennium. Cyperpsychology and Behavior, 1, 187–193. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, A. L., Mansson, S., Daneback, K., Tikkanen, R., & Ross, M. W. (2003). Predicting the future of Internet sex: Online sexual activities in Sweden. Sexual Relationship Therapy, 18, 277–291. doi: 10.1080/1468199031000153919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cravens, J. D. (2010). Facebook and relationships (Master’s thesis). East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. De Stefano, J., & Oala, M. (2008). Extramarital affairs: Basic considerations and essential tasks in clinical work. The Family Journal Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families., 16(1), 13–19. doi: 10.1177/1066480707309128.Google Scholar
  15. DiBlasio, F. A. (2000). Decision-based forgiveness treatment in cases of marital infidelity. Psychotherapy, 37, 149–158. doi: 10.1037/h0087834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103–1105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361–387. doi: 10.1080/00224499209551654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heilferty, C. M. (2010). Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: A qualitative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 945-953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05563.x.
  19. Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal Counseling and therapy for couples and families, 14, 366–371. doi: 10.1177/1066480706290508.Google Scholar
  20. Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2012). Essential elements of Internet infidelity treatment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00275.x.
  21. Hesper, E. J., & Whitty, M. T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 916–926. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, S. (2003). The impact of compulsive sexual behaviors on clergy marriages: Perspectives and concerns of the Pastor’s wife. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 10, 193–199. doi: 10.1080/107201603902306307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lumpkin, S. (2012). Can Facebook ruin your marriage? ABC World News. Retrieved from:
  24. Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13, 131–165. doi: 10.1080/10720160600870711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olson, M. M., Russel, C. S., Higgins-Kessler, M., & Miller, R. B. (2002). Emotional processes following disclosure of an extramarital affair. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 423–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb00367.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pempek, A. J., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2008). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249–278. doi: 10.1080/10720160008403700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider, J. P. (2003). The impact of compulsive cybersex behaviors on the family. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 329–354. doi: 10.1080/146819903100153946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tulane, S., Skogrand, L., & DeFrain, J. (2011). Couples in great marriages who considered divorcing. Marriage and Family Review, 47, 289–310. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2011.594215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whisman, M. A., Dixon, A. E., & Johnson, B. (1997). Therapists’ perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361–366. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and Women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 569–579. doi: 10.1089/109493103322725342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cyber cheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67. doi: 10.1177/0894439304271536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, K., Mattingly, B. A., Clark, E. M., Weidler, D. J., & Bequette, A. W. (2011). The gray area: Exploring attitudes toward infidelity and the development of the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(1), 63–86. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yarab, P. E., & Rice Allgeier, E. (1998). Don’t even think about it: The role of sexual fantasies as perceived unfaithfulness in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 21, 202–212.Google Scholar
  35. Young, K. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction- and achieving strategies for recovery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Young, K. S., Griffin-Shelley, E., Cooper, A., O’Mara, J., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 59–74. doi: 10.1080/10720160008400207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaclyn D. Cravens
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kaitlin R. Leckie
    • 1
  • Jason B. Whiting
    • 1
  1. 1.Marriage and Family Therapy ProgramTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations