Skip to main content
Log in

A Multicultural Application of Attachment Theory with Immigrant Families: Contextual and Developmental Adaptations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores attachment theory from a multicultural perspective to highlight adaptive considerations for immigrant families. The specific considerations of the theory reviewed are (1) attachment sensitivity based on social and cultural context and (2) the effect of maturation on families’ developmental needs and how this can be integrated within context. A case conceptualization of a Bosnian immigrant family living within the United States will highlight potential variations in the adaptation process. How therapists can support in providing culturally-sensitive applications of attachment theory to promote family relationships will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste, D. A. (2005). Family therapy with East Indian immigrant parents rearing children in the United States: Parental concerns, therapeutic issues, and recommendations. Contemporary Family Therapy, 27(3), 345–366. doi:10.1007/s10591-005-6214-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1971). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. I). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Preface. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical application (2nd ed., pp. xi–xvi). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen, A. H., & Crittenden, P. M. (2000). Maternal sensitivity. In P. M. Crittenden & A. H. Claussen (Eds.), The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context (pp. 115–122). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Darzens, S., & Brunod, R. (1999). An ecosystemic approach to improving mother-infant attachment in Caribbean matrifocal society. Contemporary Family Therapy, 21(4), 433–452. doi:10.1023/A:1021619003748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, R., & Owens-Manley, J. (2006). Bosnian refugees in America: New communities, new cultures. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2007). Attachment theory: Seven unresolved issues and questions for future research. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 181–201. doi:10.1080/15427600701663007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P. M. (2000). A dynamic maturational exploration of the meaning of security and adaptation: Empirical, cultural, and theoretical considerations. In P. M. Crittenden & A. H. Claussen (Eds.), The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context (pp. 358–416). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., & Spieker, S. (2008). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 317–332). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. A. (2007). Attachment-focused family therapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J. L. (1991). Women’s growth in connection: Writings from the stone center. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Lee, Y. (2004). Issues of language and culture in family therapy training. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 307–318. doi:10.1023/B:COFT.0000037917.67940.7c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093–1104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.10.1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Homeland Security. (2011). Yearbook of immigration statistics: 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1990). Developments in cross-cultural research on attachment: Some methodological notes. Human Development, 33(1), 3–9. doi:10.1159/000276498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2008). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 880–905). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weine, S., Muzurovic, N., Kulauzovic, Y., Besic, S., Lezic, A., Mujagic, A., et al. (2004). Family consequences of refugee trauma. Family Process, 43(2), 147–160. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.04302002.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel M. Mirecki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirecki, R.M., Chou, J.L. A Multicultural Application of Attachment Theory with Immigrant Families: Contextual and Developmental Adaptations. Contemp Fam Ther 35, 508–515 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9210-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9210-x

Keywords

Navigation