Abstract
Various theoretical approaches to therapy place different emphases on the use of power in therapy. In this study, we explore six master therapists’ use of power via communicational control for theoretical consistency. Results indicate that all therapists, regardless of their stance on power, use the role of therapist to exert power in an initial therapy session. Master therapists, in general, did appear to be theoretically consistent with their stated philosophies of therapy. Suggestions for future studies exploring power therapists have are included.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Evolving ideas about the implications for theory and practice. Family Process, 27, 371–393.
Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 25–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Avis, J. M. (1998). Commentary: Does neutrality neutralize feminist awareness? A Feminist response to Scheel and Ivey. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20(3), 323–331.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beitin, B. K., & Allen, K. R. (2005). A multilevel approach to integrating social justice and family therapy. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 24, 19–34.
Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405–414.
Cecchin, G. (1992). Constructing therapeutic possibilities. In S. McNamee & K. J Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 86−95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Doherty, W. (1991). Family therapy goes postmodern. Family Therapy Networker, 15(5), 36–42.
Escudero, V., & Rogers, L. E. (2004). Analyzing relational communication. In L. E Rogers & V. Escudero (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 51–79). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flaskas, C., & Humphreys, C. (1993). Theorizing about power: Intersecting the ideas of Foucault with the “problem” of power in family therapy. Family Process, 32, 35–47.
Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., & Wildman, J. (1991). Interpersonal control in structural and Milan systemic family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 395–408.
Gergen, K. J. (2000). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Harris, T., Moret, L. B., Gale, J., & Kampmeyer, K. L. (2001). Therapists’ gender assumptions and how these assumptions influence therapy. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 12, 33–59.
Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1987). Family relational communication control coding system. Unpublished manuscript.
Jones, E. (1993). Family systems therapy: Development in the Milan-systemic therapies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Keeney, B. (1983). Aesthetics of change. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, M. M., & Wieling, E. (2002). Points of connection and disconnection: A look at feminism and postmodernism in family therapy. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 14(2), 1–19.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Monk, G., & Gehart, D. R. (2003). Sociopolitical activist or conversational partner? Distinguishing the position of the therapist in narrative and collaborative therapies. Family Process, 42, 19–30.
Nylund, D., & Nylund, D. A. (2003). Narrative therapy as counter-hegemonic practice. Men and Masculinities, 5, 386–394.
Raymond, L., Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., Ellis, M. V., & Sargent, J. (1993) Communication processes in structural family therapy: Case study of an anorexic family. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 308–326.
Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox. New York: Jason Aronson.
Walters, M., Carter, B., Papp, P., & Silverstein, O. (1988). The invisible web: Gender patterns in family relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, M.J., Cheng, WJ. & Werner-Wilson, R.J. Exploring Master Therapists’ Use of Power in Conversation. Contemp Fam Ther 28, 475–484 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-006-9016-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-006-9016-9