Computational Optimization and Applications

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 771–794

Constrained Dogleg methods for nonlinear systems with simple bounds

  • Stefania Bellavia
  • Maria Macconi
  • Sandra Pieraccini
Article

Abstract

We focus on the numerical solution of medium scale bound-constrained systems of nonlinear equations. In this context, we consider an affine-scaling trust region approach that allows a great flexibility in choosing the scaling matrix used to handle the bounds. The method is based on a dogleg procedure tailored for constrained problems and so, it is named Constrained Dogleg method. It generates only strictly feasible iterates. Global and locally fast convergence is ensured under standard assumptions. The method has been implemented in the Matlab solver CoDoSol that supports several diagonal scalings in both spherical and elliptical trust region frameworks. We give a brief account of CoDoSol and report on the computational experience performed on a number of representative test problems.

Keywords

Bound-constrained equations Diagonal scalings Trust region methods Dogleg methods Newton methods Global convergence 

References

  1. 1.
    Bellavia, S., Macconi, M., Morini, B.: An affine scaling trust-region approach to bound-constrained nonlinear systems. Appl. Numer. Math. 44, 257–280 (2003) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellavia, S., Macconi, M., Morini, B.: STRSCNE: A scaled trust-region solver for constrained nonlinear equations. Comput. Optim. Appl. 28, 31–50 (2004) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellavia, S., Macconi, M., Pieraccini, S.: On affine scaling inexact dogleg methods for bound-constrained nonlinear systems. Tech. Rep. 5/2009 (2009) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellavia, S., Morini, B.: An interior global method for nonlinear systems with simple bounds. Optim. Methods Softw. 20, 1–22 (2005) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellavia, S., Morini, B.: Subspace trust-region methods for large bound constrained nonlinear equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 1535–1555 (2006) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman, T.F., Li, Y.: An interior trust-region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J. Optim. 6, 418–445 (1996) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, T.A.: Algorithm 832: UMFPACK, an unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 30, 196–199 (2004) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dirkse, S.P., Ferris, M.C.: MCPLIB: A collection of nonlinear mixed complementary problems. Optim. Methods Softw. 5, 319–345 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. 91, 201–213 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floudas, C.A., et al.: Handbook of Test Problems in Local and Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 33. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Francisco, J.B., Krejic, N., Martinez, J.M.: An interior-point method for solving box-constrained underdetermined nonlinear systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 177, 67–88 (2005) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hager, W.W., Mair, B.A., Zhang, H.: An affine-scaling interior-point CBB method for box-constrained optimization. Math. Program., Ser. A 119, 1–32 (2009) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heinkenschloss, M., Ulbrich, M., Ulbrich, S.: Superlinear and quadratic convergence of affine-scaling interior-point Newton methods for problems with simple bounds without strict complementarity assumptions. Math. Program. 86, 615–635 (1999) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hock, W., Schittkowski, K.: Test Examples for Nonlinear Programming Codes. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 187. Springer, Berlin (1981) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanzow, C., Klug, A.: On affine-scaling interior-point Newton methods for nonlinear minimization with bound constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 35, 177–197 (2006) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanzow, C., Klug, A.: An interior-point affine-scaling trust-region method for semismooth equations with box constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 37, 329–353 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelley, C.T.: Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia (1995) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelley, C.T., Northrup, J.I.: A pointwise Quasi-Newton method for integral equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25, 1138–1155 (1988) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kozakevich, D.N., Martinez, J.M., Santos, S.A.: Solving nonlinear systems of equations with simple bounds. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 16, 215–235 (1997) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luksan, L., Vlcek, J.: Sparse and partially separable test problems for unconstrained and equality constrained optimization. Technical Report N. 767, Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (1999) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macconi, M., Morini, B., Porcelli, M.: A Gauss-Newton method for solving bound-constrained underdetermined nonlinear systems. Optim. Methods Softw. 24, 219–235 (2009) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macconi, M., Morini, B., Porcelli, M.: Trust-region quadratic methods for nonlinear systems of mixed equalities and inequalities. Appl. Numer. Math. 59, 859–876 (2009) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meintjes, K., Morgan, A.P.: A methodology for solving chemical equilibrium systems, Applied. Math. Comput. 22, 333–361 (1987) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meintjes, K., Morgan, A.P.: Chemical equilibrium systems as numerical tests problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 16, 143–151 (1990) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moré, J.J.: A collection of nonlinear model problems. Lect. Appl. Math. 26, 723–762 (1990) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moré, J.J., Garbow, B., Hillstrom, K.: Testing unconstrained optimization software. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 7, 136–140 (1981) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pawlowski, R.P., Simonis, J.P., Walker, H.F., Shadid, J.N.: Inexact Newton dogleg methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 2112–2132 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsoulos, I.G., Stavrakoudis, A.: On locating all roots of systems of nonlinear equations inside bounded domain using global optimization methods. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 11, 2465–2471 (2010) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wachter, A., Biegler, L.T.: Failure of global convergence for a class of interior point methods for nonlinear programming. Math. Program., Ser. A 88, 565–574 (2000) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, T., Monteiro, R.D.C., Pang, J.-S.: An interior point potential reduction method for constrained equations. Math. Program. 74, 159–195 (1996) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu, D.: An affine scaling trust-region algorithm with interior backtracking technique for solving bound-constrained nonlinear systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 184, 343–361 (2005) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefania Bellavia
    • 1
  • Maria Macconi
    • 1
  • Sandra Pieraccini
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Energetica ‘S. Stecco’Università di FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze MatematichePolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations