Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing SOS and SDP relaxations of sensor network localization

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the relationships between various sum of squares (SOS) and semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations for the sensor network localization problem. In particular, we show that Biswas and Ye’s SDP relaxation is equivalent to the degree one SOS relaxation of Kim et al. We also show that Nie’s sparse-SOS relaxation is stronger than the edge-based semidefinite programming (ESDP) relaxation, and that the trace test for accuracy, which is very useful for SDP and ESDP relaxations, can be extended to the sparse-SOS relaxation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfakih, A., Anjos, M.F., Piccialli, V., Wolkowicz, H.: Euclidean distance matrices, semidefinite programming, and sensor network localization. Port. Math. 68(1), 53–102 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfakih, A., Khandani, A., Wolkowicz, H.: Solving Euclidean distance matrix completion problems via semidefinite programming. Comput. Optim. Appl. 12, 13–30 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas, P., Ye, Y.: Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. In: Proc. 3rd IPSN, Berkeley, CA, pp. 46–54 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas, P., Ye, Y.: A distributed method for solving semidefinite programs arising from ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. In: Mutiscale Optimization Methods and Applications, Nonconvex Optim. Appl., vol. 82, pp. 69–84. Springer, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter, W., Jin, H.H., Saunders, M.A., Ye, Y.: SpaseLoc: an adaptive subproblem algorithm for scalable wireless sensor network localization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 1102–1128 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, Y., Krislock, N., Qian, J., Wolkowicz, H.: Sensor network localization, Euclidean distance matrix completions, and graph realization. Optim. Eng. 11, 45–66 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Doherty, L., Pister, K.S.J., El Ghaoui, L.: Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. 20th INFOCOM, Los Alamitos, CA, vol. 3, pp. 1655–1663 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, S., Kojima, M., Waki, H.: Exploiting sparsity in SDP relaxation for sensor network localization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 192–215 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Krislock, N., Piccialli, V., Wolkowicz, H.: Robust semidefinite programming approaches for sensor network localization with anchors. Report, Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, May 2006

  10. Krislock, N., Rendl, F., Wolkowiz, H.: Noisy sensor network localization using semidefinite representations and facial reduction. Report, Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, March 2010

  11. Krislock, N., Wolkowicz, H.: Explicit sensor network localization using semidefinite representations and facial reductions. SIAM J. Optim. 20, 2679–2708 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Krislock, N., Wolkowicz, H.: Euclidean distance matrices and applications. In: Handbook of Semidefinite, Cone and Polynomial Optimization: Theory, Algorithms, Software and Applications

  13. Nie, J.: Sum of squares method for sensor network localization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 43, 151–179 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie, J., Demmel, J.: Sparse SOS relaxations for minimizing functions that are summations of small polynomials. SIAM J. Optim. 19, 1534–1558 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pong, T.K., Tseng, P.: (Robust) edge-based semidefinite programming relaxation of sensor network localization. Math. Program. (2010). doi:10.1007/s10107-009-0338-x

    Google Scholar 

  16. So, A.M.-C., Ye, Y.: Theory of semidefinite programming for sensor network localization. Math. Program. 109, 367–384 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sturm, J.F.: Using Se.Du.Mi. 1.02, A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones (updated for Version 1.05). Report, Department of Econometrics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, August 1998–October 2001

  18. Tseng, P.: Second-order cone programming relaxation of sensor network localizations. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 156–185 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z., Zheng, S., Ye, Y., Boyd, S.: Further relaxations of the semidefinite programming approach to sensor network localization. SIAM J. Optim. 19, 655–673 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, Z., So, A.M.-C., Ye, Y.: Universal rigidity and edge sparsification for sensor network localization. SIAM J. Optim. 20, 3059–3081 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Gouveia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gouveia, J., Pong, T.K. Comparing SOS and SDP relaxations of sensor network localization. Comput Optim Appl 52, 609–627 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-011-9431-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-011-9431-1

Keywords

Navigation