Advertisement

Behavior representation in modeling and simulation: introduction to CMOT special issue: BRiMS 2013

  • William G. Kennedy
  • Robert St. Amant
  • David Reitter
Manuscript
  • 151 Downloads

This special issue of the journal is based on the best papers from the 2013 annual meeting of the Behavioral Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRiMS) Society. Over the winder holiday, after 20 papers were accepted for presentation as talks and several more for presentation as posters, disaster struck. The original meeting had to be cancelled because of the loss of a third or more of the accepted papers as a result of the just implemented Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) restrictions on conference attendance. These restrictions curtailed conference funding by regular BRiMS conference sponsors and basically eliminated attendance by regular participants from military laboratories and DoD contractors. With gracious support from our colleagues, the meeting was resurrected as a meeting co-located with the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling being held at Carlton University in Ottawa, Canada in the summer of 2013. The reconstituted meeting included over a dozen scheduled...

Keywords

Team Performance Opinion Dynamic Individual Team Member Winder Holiday Intelligence Analyst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adali S, Chan K, Cho J-H (2015) A trust-based framework for information sharing behavior in command and control environments. Comput Math Organ Theory (in press) (and this special issue) Google Scholar
  2. Arendt DL, Blaha LM (2015) Opinions, influence, and zealotry: a computational study on stubbornness. Comput Math Organ Theory 21(2):184–209 (and this special issue) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best BJ, Kennedy WG, St. Amant R (2015) Behavioral representation in modeling and simulation: introduction to CMOT special issue—BRiMS 2012. Comput Math Organ Theory 21(3):243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Paik J, Pirolli P (2013) ACT-R models of information foraging in geospatial intelligence tasks. Comput Math Organ Theory 21(3):274–295 (and this special issue) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ritter FE, Kennedy WG, Best BE (2013) The best papers from BRIMS 2011: models of users and teams interacting. J Comput Math Organ Theory 19(3):283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Schöfisch B, Hadeler KP (1996) Dimer automata and cellular automata. Physica D 94:188–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • William G. Kennedy
    • 1
  • Robert St. Amant
    • 2
  • David Reitter
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Social Complexity, Krasnow Institute for Advanced StudyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.College of Information Sciences and TechnologyUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations