How controls influence organizational information processing: insights from a computational modeling investigation

  • Chris P. Long
  • Sim B. Sitkin
  • Laura B. Cardinal
  • Richard M. Burton


In this study, we use a series of computational models to investigate an information processing perspective on organizational control use. We evaluate and compare the information processing capabilities of various formal and informal control configurations under different information uncertainty conditions. We find that a wide range of formal controls can be used to direct subordinates performing interdependent tasks while a more narrow range of informal controls are most effective for directing subordinates who perform complex tasks. Results of this study provide a basis for formalizing an information processing perspective on organizational control implementation that differs but is complementary to the current emphasis on agency in organizational control research.


Organizational control Information processing Computational modeling 


  1. Burton RM (2003) Computational laboratories for organization science: questions, validity, and docking. Comput Math Organ Theory 9:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: managing research and development using input, behavior, and output controls. Organ Sci 12:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardinal L, Sitkin S, Long C (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ Sci 15:411–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardinal L, Turner S, Fern M, Burton R (2011) Organizing product development across technological environments: performance trade-offs and priorities. Organ Sci 22:1000–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choudhury V, Sabherwal R (2003) Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inf Syst Res 14:291–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q 17:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daft R, Lengel RH (1984) Information richness: a new approach to manager information processing and organization design. In: Staw B, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  8. Daft R, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci 32:554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Manag Rev 32:480–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenhardt K (1985) Control: organizational and economic approaches. Manag Sci 31:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt K (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad of Manag Rev 31:57–74Google Scholar
  12. Fayol H (1949) General and industrial management (Storrs C, trans). Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Galbraith JR (1973) Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  14. Galbraith JR (1977) Organization design. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  15. Galbraith JR (2012) The future of organization design. J Organ Design 1:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad Manag Rev 1:13–47Google Scholar
  17. Hagel J III, Brown JS (2007) The only sustainable edge: why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison J, Carroll G (1991) Keeping the faith: a model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Adm Sci Q 36:552–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison JR, Zhiang L, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad Manag Rev 32:1229–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huber G, McDaniel RR (1986) The decision-making paradigm of organization design. Manag Sci 32:572–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin Y, Levitt R (1996) The virtual design team: a computational model of project organizations. Comput Math Organ Theory 2:171–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirsch L (1996) The management of complex tasks in organizations: controlling the systems development process. Organ Sci 7:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirsch L (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inf Syst Res 8:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirsch L (2004) Deploying common systems globally: the dynamics of control. Inf Syst Res 15:374–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leifer R, Mills PK (1996) An information processing approach for deciding upon control strategies and reducing control loss in emerging organizations. J of Manag 22:113–137Google Scholar
  26. Levinthal D (1988) A survey of agency models of organizations. J Econ Behav Organ 9:153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levitt RE, Cohen GP, Kunz JC, Nass CL, Christiansen T, Jin Y (1994) The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In: Carley KM, Prietula MJ (eds) Computational organization theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  28. Levitt R, Thomsen J, Christiansen TR, Kunz JC, Yan J, Nass C (1999) Simulating project work processes and organizations: towards a micro contingency theory of organizational design. Manag Sci 45:1479–1495CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Long CP (2010) Control to cooperation: examining the role of managerial authority in portfolios of managerial actions.   In: Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema K (eds) Organizational control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 365–395Google Scholar
  30. Long C, Burton RM, Cardinal LB (2002) Three controls are better than one: a computational model of complex control systems. Comput Math Organ Theory 8:197–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lubatkin M, Lane PJ, Collin S, Very P (2007) An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. J Organ Behav 28:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Makhija MV, Ganesh U (1997) Control and partner learning in learning-related joint ventures. Organ Sci 8:508–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver C (1998) Critical theory perspectives on control. Adm Sci Q 43:257–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ouchi W (1977) The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Adm Sci Q 22:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manag Sci 25:833–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ouchi W (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm Sci Q 25:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perrow C (1965) Hospitals technology, structure and goals. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand-McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. Simons R (1995) Levers of control: how managers use innovative control contexts to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Snell S (1992) Control theory in strategic human resource management: the mediating effect of administrative information. Acad Manag J 35:292–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snell S, Youndt M (1995) Human resource management and firm performance: testing a contingency model of executive controls. J Manag 21:711–737Google Scholar
  42. Thompson JD (1967) Organization in action: social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner K, Makhija MV (2006) The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Acad Manag Rev 31:198–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tushman ML (1978) Technical communication in R&D laboratories: the impact of project work characteristics. Acad Manag J 21:624–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Acad Manag Rev 3:613–624Google Scholar
  46. Van de Ven AH, Delgecq AL, Koenig R (1976) A task contingent model of work-unit structure. Adm Sci Q 19:322–338Google Scholar
  47. Van Maanen J, Schein E (1979) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In: Staw B, Cummings L (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  48. VITE’ Handbook (1998) Vite’ CorporationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McDonough School of BusinessGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Fuqua School of BusinessDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.C. T. Bauer College of BusinessUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations