Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 283–287 | Cite as

The best papers from BRIMS 2011: models of users and teams interacting

  • Frank E. Ritter
  • William G. Kennedy
  • Bradley J. Best
SI: BRIMS 2012

Abstract

This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217–219, 2010; 17(3):225–228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.

Keywords

Cognitive modeling Agent-based modeling Task analysis Situation awareness EEG Machine learning Team models 

References

  1. Ball J, Myers C, Heiberg A, Cooke NJ, Matessa M, Freiman M et al (2010) The synthetic teammate project. Comput Math Organ Theory 16:271–299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best BJ (2012) Inducing models of behavior from expert task performance in virtual environments. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-012-9136-8 Google Scholar
  3. Bolton ML (2012) Automatic validation and failure diagnosis of human-device interfaces using task analytic models and model checking. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-012-9138-6 Google Scholar
  4. Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. John BE, Kieras DE (1996) The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 3(4):320–351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones RM, Laird JE, Nielsen PE, Coulter KJ, Kenny P, Koss FV (1999) Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Mag 20(1):27–41 Google Scholar
  7. Jones RET, Connors ES, Mossey ME, Hyatt JR, Hansen NJ, Endsley MR (2011) Using fuzzy cognitive mapping techniques to model situation awareness for army infantry platoon leaders. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(3):272–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jungkunz P, Darken CJ (2011) A computational model for human eye-movements in military simulations. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(3):229–250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kennedy WG, Ritter FE, Best BJ (2010) The best papers from BRIMS2009: cultural and group models. Comput Math Organ Theory 16(3):217–219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kennedy WG, Ritter FE, Best BJ (2011) Behavioral representation in modeling and simulation introduction to CMOT special issue—BRiMS 2010. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(3):225–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin L, Goodrich MA (2010) A Bayesian approach to modeling lost person behaviors based on terrain features in wilderness search and rescue. Comput Math Organ Theory 16:300–323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore LR (2011) Cognitive model exploration and optimization: a new challenge for computer science. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(3):296–313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan JH, Morgan GP, Ritter FE (2010) A preliminary model of participation for small groups. Comput Math Organ Theory 16:246–270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mueller ST, Simpkins B, Anno G, Fallon CK, Price O, McClellan GE (2011) Adapting the task-taxon-task methodology to model the impact of chemical protective gear. Comput Math Organ Theory 17(3):251–271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reitter D, Lebiere C (2010) A cognitive model of spatial path-planning. Comput Math Organ Theory 16:220–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ritter FE, Kase SE, Bhandarkar D, Lewis B, Cohen MA (2007) dTank updated: exploring moderator-influenced behavior in a light-weight synthetic environment. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation. University of Central Florida, Norfolk, pp 51–60. 07-BRIMS-014 Google Scholar
  17. Ritter FE, Bittner JL, Kase SE, Evertsz R, Pedrotti M, Busetta P (2012) CoJACK: a high-level cognitive architecture with demonstrations of moderators, variability, and implications for situation awareness. Biol Inspir Cognit Archit 1(1):2–13 Google Scholar
  18. Rodgers SM, Myers CW, Ball J, Freiman MD (2012) Toward a situation model in a cognitive architecture. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-012-9134-x Google Scholar
  19. Stevens R, Galloway T, Wang P, Berka C, Tan V, Wohlgemuth T et al (2012) Modeling the neurodynamic complexity of submarine navigation teams. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-012-9135-9 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank E. Ritter
    • 1
  • William G. Kennedy
    • 2
  • Bradley J. Best
    • 3
  1. 1.University ParkUSA
  2. 2.FairfaxUSA
  3. 3.BellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations